The regional port competition with different terminal competition intensity
- 439 Downloads
This paper studies the regional container port competition problem which involves two port cities each with its own container terminal. We provide two-level game-theoretic models to characterize several practice-related issues, such as container terminal cooperation situation, and the difference between local in/out and transshipment container throughputs. Numerical experiments are conducted based on the port system in the Pearl River Delta area of China. We find that (1) the two ports in the heterogeneous regional port system should focus on differentiating services rather than compete with each other in every service; (2) the terminal cooperation may not be preferred by both of the port city governments; (3) the developed port will gradually dominate the transshipment container business in the system, leaving the developing port to focus its efforts on the local in/out container business instead.
KeywordsOR in maritime industry Container terminal Port competition Terminal cooperation Hotelling model
The work described in this paper was substantially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the HKSAR, China, T32-620/11. The first author is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71302109) and Natural Science Foundation of SZU (Grant No. 201422). The authors are also grateful to the managers from Hong Kong International Terminals (HIT) for their valuable information.
- Cachon G, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in supply chain analysis. In: Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen M (eds) Supply chain analysis in the eBusiness Era. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Castro-Villaverde J, Coto-Milln P (1998) Port economic impact: methodologies and application to the port of Santander. Int J Transp Econ 2:159–179Google Scholar
- De Borger B, Proost S, Van Dender K (2008) Private port pricing and public investment in port and hinterland capacity. J Transp Econ Policy 42:527–561Google Scholar
- De Langen PW (2007) Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands: the case of Austria. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 7(1):1–14Google Scholar
- Ferrari C, Percoco M, Tedeschi A (2010) Ports and local development: evidence from Italy. Int J Transp Econ 37:1–26Google Scholar
- Leachman RC (2005) Final report: port and modal elasticity study. Piedmont, Southern California Association of Governments, PiedmontGoogle Scholar
- Murphy PR, Daley JM, Dalenberg DR (1992) Port selection criteria: an application of a transportation research framework. Logist Transp Rev 28:238–254Google Scholar
- Wang J, Olivier D (2007a) Hong Kong and Shenzen: the Nexus in South China. In: Cullinane K, Song DW (eds) Asian container ports. Development, competition and co-operation. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke, pp 198–212Google Scholar
- Wang J, Oliver D (2007b) Shanghai and Ningbo: in search of an identity for the Chanjiang Delta region. In: Cullinane K, Song DW (eds) Asian container ports. Development, competition and co-operation. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke, pp 183–197Google Scholar
- Yeo GT, Roe M, Dinwoodie J (2008) Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transp Res Part A 42(6):910–921Google Scholar
- Zhang A (2008) The impact of hinterland access conditions on rivalry between ports. Discussion Paper No. 208-8, OECD/ITFGoogle Scholar