Advertisement

Fish Physiology and Biochemistry

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 235–243 | Cite as

Some immunological responses of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerling to acute extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (50 Hz)

  • Mahsa Mohammadi-Zadeh Khoshroo
  • Mehdi Shamsaie Mehrjan
  • Farzaneh Samiee
  • Mehdi Soltani
  • Seyed Pezhman Hosseini Shekarabi
Article
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing of anthropogenic electromagnetic fields in aquatic environments has been recently become the core of attention. In this study, the effect of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (50 Hz) on immune status and metabolic markers of common carp fingerling was assessed. The fish were exposed to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields at four intensities of 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 mT only once for 2 h; then, they were reared for 60 days. Results showed that the levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were increased with an increase in the electromagnetic field intensity on 15 and 60 days post exposure. A significant increase was obtained in these enzyme levels in all the tested intensities compared to the control one (p < 0.05), with a maximum value measured in 2-mT trail. Conversely, with an increasing in the electromagnetic intensity, the levels of C3, C4, and lysozyme were reduced in all the treated groups in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). The results suggested a significant impact of electromagnetic on fish immunophysiological functions. Therefore, it is required to have serious attention in aquatic ecosystems.

Keywords

Electromagnetic fields Cyprinus carpio Metabolic enzymes Nonspecific immunity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A special thank goes to laboratory staff of the Science and Research Branch, IAU (Tehran, Iran). The authors also thank Mr. Fardin Komai for his help with the language correction of this paper.

References

  1. Ahlbom A, Bridges J, Rd S, Hillert L, Juutilainen J, Mattsson MO, Neubauer G, Schüz J, Simko M, Bromen K (2008) Possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health—opinion of the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR). Toxicology 246:248–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg H (1999) Problems of weak electromagnetic field effects in cell biology. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 48:355–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Büyükuslu N, Çelik Ö, Atak Ç (2006) The effect of magnetic field on the activity of superoxide dismutase. J Cell Mol Biol 5:57–62Google Scholar
  4. Casillas E, Myers M, Ames W (1983) Relationship of serum chemistry values to liver and kidney histopathology in English sole (Parophrys vetulus) after acute exposure to carbon-tetrachloride. Aquat Toxicol 3:61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chebotareva YV, Izyumov YG, Krylov VV (2009) The effect of an alternating electromagnetic field upon early development in roach (Rutilus rutilus: Cyprinidae, Cypriniformes). J Ichthyol 49:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Claire M, Holland H, Lambris JD (2002) The complement system in teleosts. Fish Shellfish Immunol 12:399–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuppen JJM, Wiegertjes GF, Lobee HWJ, Savelkoul HFJ, Elmusharaf MA, Beynen AC, Grooten HNA, Smink W (2007) Immune stimulation in fish and chicken through weak low frequency electromagnetic fields. Environmentalist 27:577–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D’Inzeo G, Pisa S, Tarricone L (1993) Ionic channel gating under electromagnetic exposure: a stochastic model. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 29:289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmusharaf MA, Cuppen JJ, Grooten HNA, Beynen AC (2007) Antagonistic effect of electromagnetic field exposure on coccidiosis infection in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 86:2139–2143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Emre M, Cetiner S, Zencir S, Unlukurt I, Kahraman I, Topcu Z (2011) Oxidative stress and apoptosis in relation to exposure to magnetic field. Cell Biochem Biophys 59:71–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Galvanovskis J, Sandblom J (1998) Periodic forcing of intracellular calcium oscillators. Theoretical studies of the effect of low-frequency fields on the magnitude of the effects of low frequency fields on the magnitude of oscillations. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 46:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gill AB, Bartlett M, Thomsen F (2012) Potential interactions between diadromous fishes of U.K. conservation importance and the electromagnetic fields and subsea noise from marine renewable energy developments. J Fish Biol 81:664–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gill AB, Kimber JA (2005) The potential for cooperative management of elasmobranchs and offshore renewable energy development in U.K. waters Cambridge Journals Online. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 85:1075–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guldberg RB (1991) A review of cancer induction by extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: is there possible mechanism? Med Hypothesis 35:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ibrahim NK, Gharib OA (2010) The protective effect of antioxidants on oxidative stress in rats exposed to the 950 MHz electromagnetic field. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 3:1143–1155Google Scholar
  16. Jiminez B, Stegeman J (1990) Detoxification enzymes as indicator of environmental stress on fishes. Am Fish Soc Symp 8:69–79Google Scholar
  17. Justo OR, Pérez VH, Alvarez DC, Alegre RM (2006) Growth of Eüerichia coli under extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 134:155–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Khadir R, Morgan JL, Murray JJ (1999) Effects of 60 Hz magnetic field exposure on polymorphonuclear leukocyte activation. Biochem Biophys Acta 1472:359–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kheifets L, Bowmann JD, Checkoway H, Feychting M, Harrington JM, Kavert R, Marsh G, Mezei G, Renew DC, Wijngaarden EV (2009) Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations. Occup Environ Med 66:72–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim DH, Austin B (2006) Innate immune responses in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) induced by probiotics. Fish Shellfish Immunol 21:513–524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kula B, Dróżdż M (1996) Study of magnetic field effects on fibroblasts cultures. Part 2. The evaluation of effects of static and extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields on free-radicals processes in fibroblasts cultures. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 39:27–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kwee S, Raskmark P (1998) Changes in cell proliferation due to environmental non-ionizing radiation: 2. Microwave radiation. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 44(2):251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li SH, Chow KC (2001) Magnetic field exposure induces DNA degradation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280:1385–1388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu X, Zhao L, Yu D, Ma S, Liu X (2013) Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field on the health of workers in automotive industry. Electromagn Biol Med 32:551–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Loghmannia J, Heidari B, Rozati SA, Kazemi S (2015) The physiological responses of the Caspian kutum (Rutilus frisii kutum) fry to the static magnetic fields with different intensities during acute and subacute exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 111:215–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nafisi S, Bafande Y, Hobbenaghi R, Majedi Asl L (2010) Influence of electromagnetic fields of two phases square wave with low frequency on serum ALT and AST levels and histochemistry of hepatocytes glycogen. Glob Vet 5:204–208Google Scholar
  27. Nafziger J, Desjobert H, Benamar B, Guillosson JJ (1993) DNA mutations and 50 Hz electromagnetic fields. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 30:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nofouzi K, Sheikhzadeh N, Mohammad-Zadeh Jassur D, Ashrafi-Helan J (2015) Influence of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on growth performance, innate immune response, biochemical parameters and disease resistance in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Physiol Biochem 41:721–731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nonaka M, Smith SL (2000) Complement system of bony and cartilaginous fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol 10:215–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pawlak K, Sechman A, Neickarz Z, Wojtysiak D (2013) Effect of weak electromagnetic field on cardiac work, concentration of thyroid hormones and blood aminotransferase level in the chick embryo. Acta Vet Hung 61:383–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rao JV (2006) Toxic effects of novel organophosphorus insecticide (RPR-V) on certain biochemical parameters of euryhaline fish, Oreochromis mossambicus. Pestic Biochem Physiol 86:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Redlarski G, Lewczuk B, Żak A, Koncicki A, Krawczuk M, Piechocki J, Jakubiuk K, Tojza P, Jaworski J, Ambroziak D, Skarbek Ł, Gradolewski D (2015) The influence of electromagnetic pollution on living organisms: historical trends and forecasting changes. Biomed Res Int p 18  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/234098
  33. Reitman S, Frankle S (1957) A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am J Clin Pathol 28:56–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruediger HW (2009) Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Pathophysiology 16:89–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Samiee F, Samiee K (2017) Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field on brain histopathology of Caspian Sea Cyprinus carpio. Electromagn Biol Med 36:31–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Saurabh S, Sahoo PK (2008) An important defence molecule of fish innate immune system. Aquac Res 39:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shams-Lahijani M, Minae Tehrani D, Varzideh F (2012) Effects of the ELF-MFs on the development of spleens of preincubated chicken embryos. Electromagn Biol Med 32:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharma U, Pal D, Prasad R (2014) Alkaline phosphatase: an overview. Ind J Clin Biochem 29:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snedeker SM, Greger JL (1983) Metabolism of zinc, copper and iron as affected by dietary protein, cysteine and histidine. J Nutr 113:644–652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Soltani M, Mirzargar SS (2013) Effect of tricainemethanesulfonate (MS222), clove oil and electro-anaesthesia on respiratory burst activity in whole blood and serum alternative complement response in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), during the narcosis stage. Fish Shellfish Immunol 34:692–696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tort L, Balasch JC, Mackenzie S (2003) Fish immune system. A crossroads between innate and adaptive responses. Immunologia 22:277–286Google Scholar
  42. Xie TD, Chen YD, Marszalek P, Tsong TY (1997) Fluctuation-driven directional flow in biochemical cycle: further study of electric activation of Na, K pumps. Biophys J 72:2496–2502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahsa Mohammadi-Zadeh Khoshroo
    • 1
  • Mehdi Shamsaie Mehrjan
    • 1
  • Farzaneh Samiee
    • 2
  • Mehdi Soltani
    • 3
  • Seyed Pezhman Hosseini Shekarabi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries Science, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Aquatic Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations