Effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on growth performance and plasma biochemical parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
- 467 Downloads
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) on growth performance and plasma biochemical parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Graded levels of EEP [0 (control), 1, 2, and 4 g kg−1 diet] were fed to trout juveniles (mean weight 7.73 ± 0.17 g) for 10 weeks. Dietary EEP supplementation regardless of inclusion level significantly improved the specific growth rate of fish. Similarly, supplemental EEP generally improved the feed efficiency ratio and protein efficiency ratio, but no significant differences were observed between the 1 g kg−1 EEP group and the control group. In addition, dietary EEP supplementation generally increased the plasma superoxide dismutase, lysozyme, total antioxidant capacity, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase activities, but decreased the plasma malondialdehyde level. The plasma triglycerides level was significantly lower in the 1 or 4 g kg−1 EEP group as compared with the control group. Dietary EEP supplementation generally decreased the plasma aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities, but increased the hepatic aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities. These results indicate the potential to use the EEP as a growth promoter, hepatoprotective agent, and immunostimulant for rainbow trout.
KeywordsRainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Ethanolic extract of propolis Growth promoter Immunostimulant
This research was supported financially by Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (2008CD126) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (30960298).
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1995) Official methods of analysis of official analytical chemists international, 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
- Beukelman CJ, de Vries PJF, Schaafsma A, Quarles van Ufford HC, Kuenen J, Kroes BH, van den Worm E, van den Berg AJJ, Labadie RP, van Dijk H (1997) Immunomodulating properties of propolis. Pharm Pharmaco Lett 7(2):75–77Google Scholar
- Cai JL, Tang XL, Yang LF, Su XY (2001) Propolis inactivated vaccine against infectious serositis in young ducks. Chin J Vet Sci 21:552–553 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Castro SL (2001) Propolis: biological and pharmacological activities. Therapeutic uses of this bee-product. Ann Rev Biomed Sci 3:49–83Google Scholar
- Cheng PC, Wong G (1996) Honey bee propolis: prospects in medicine. Bee World 77:8–15Google Scholar
- Denli M, Cankaya S, Silici S, Okan F, Uluocak AN (2005) Effect of dietary addition of Turkish propolis on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and serum variables of Quail (Coturnix cotrunix japonica). Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 18:848–854Google Scholar
- Hadi A, Shokr A, Alwan S (2009) Effects of aluminum on the biochemical parameters of fresh waterfish Tilapia zillii. J Sci Applica 3:33–41Google Scholar
- Osman AGM, Koutb M, Sayed AEH (2010) Use of hematological parameters to assess the efficiency of quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller) leaf extract in alleviation of the effect of ultraviolet–A radiation on African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). J Photochem Photobio 99B:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.01.002 Google Scholar
- Sawaya ACHF, Palma AM, Caetano FM, Marcucci MC, Silvacunha IB, Araujo CEP, Shimizu MT (2002) Comparative study of in vitro methods used to analyse the activity of propolis extracts with different compositions against species of Candida. Lett Appl Microbiol 35:203–207. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01169.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seven PT (2008) The effects of dietary Turkish propolis and vitamin C on performance, digestibility, egg production and egg quality in laying hens under different environmental temperatures. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 8:1164–1170Google Scholar