Fish Physiology and Biochemistry

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 845–853 | Cite as

Seawater tolerance in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., brown trout, Salmo trutta L., and S. salar × S. trutta hybrids smolt

  • H. A. Urke
  • J. Koksvik
  • J. V. Arnekleiv
  • K. Hindar
  • F. Kroglund
  • T. Kristensen
Article

Abstract

High levels of hybridization between Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) have been reported in the Gyrodactylus salaris infected Rivers Vefsna and Driva in Norway. The survival and behaviour during the sea phase of such hybrids is unknown. The reported work documents ionoregulatory status after 24 h seawater challenge tests (24hSW) and gill Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) activity of migrating wild smolts of Atlantic salmon, brown trout and hybrids at two sampling dates during the 2006 smolt run in River Driva. Salmon, trout and hybrids contributed to 27, 52 and 21% of the catches, respectively. The large contribution of hybrids suggests both a high hybridization rate and a high survival rate from fry to smolt. Both salmon and hybrids had a well-developed seawater tolerance at the time of downstream migration, revealed by small ionoregulatory effects and no or low mortality rates during the 24hSW tests. The trout were not fully adapted to seawater, and high mortality rates were observed (71 and 92%) during the 24hSW tests. The NKA activity was not significantly different between salmon and hybrids. Most of the hybrids were physiologically capable of direct entry to full strength seawater. The incomplete seawater tolerance in trout compared to salmon corresponds well with differences in life-history patterns between these two species. The life history strategy of the hybrids during the sea phase is not known, and further investigations on the marine behaviour and survival is needed to evaluate the role of hybrids in the risk of spreading G. salaris to nearby river systems.

Keywords

Smoltification Seawater tolerance Salmo salar Salmo trutta Hybrids 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the field assistance given by Lars Rønning and Gaute Kjærstad at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Prof. Sigurd Stefansson and Dr. Tom Ole Nilsen University of Bergen, Department of Biology for conducting the NKA analyses and Dr. Carolyn Knight and Dr. Thrond Oddvar Haugen, Norwegian Institute of Water Research for improving the manuscript. The reported work was financed by the county of Møre and Romsdal through project no (43/2006). This study was conducted as a part of a long-term study in salmonid smolts financed by the TrønderEnergi power company. Funding of manuscript preparation was kindly provided by Norwegian Institute of Water Research and Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

References

  1. Arnekleiv JV, Koksvik J, Hindar K, Rønning L, Kjærstad G (2006) Smoltundersøkelser i Driva i 2005 i forbindelse med endring av manøvreringsreglement for Driva kraftverk. NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet Zoologisk notat 2006 2:1–23 (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  2. Brown AJ (1993) Endocrine responses to environmental pollutants. In: Rankin JC, Jensen FB (eds) Fish Ecophysiology. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 276–295Google Scholar
  3. Bystriansky JS, Richards JG, Schulte PM, Ballantyne JS (2006) Reciprocal expression of gill Na+/K+-ATPase α-subunit isoforms α1a and α1b during seawater acclimation of three salmonid fishes that vary in their salinity tolerance. J Exp Biol 209:1874–1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cronin MA, Spearman WJ, Wilmot RL, Patton JC, Bickham JW (1993) Mitochondrial DNA variation in chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and chum salmon (O. keta) detected by restriction enzyme analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:708–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finstad B, Nilssen KJ, Arnesen AM (1989) Seasonal changes in sea-water tolerance of Artic Charr, (Salvelinus alpinus). J Comp Physiol B 159:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gephard S, Moran P, Garcia-Vazquez E (2000) Evidence of successful natural reproduction between brown trout and mature male Atlantic salmon parr. Trans Am Fish Soc 129(1):301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gross R, Nilsson J, Schmitz M (1996) A new species-specific nuclear DNA marker for identification of hybrids between Atlantic salmon and brown trout. J Fish Biol 49:537–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hindar K, Balstad T (1994) Salmonid culture and interspecific hybridization. Conserv Biol 8:881–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoar WS (1988) The physiology of smolting salmonides. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish Physiology: The Physiology of Developing Fish, vol XIB. Academic Press, New York, pp 275–343Google Scholar
  10. Høgåsen HR, Brun E (2003) Risk of inter-river transmission of Gyrodactylus salaris by migrating Atlantic salmon smolts estimated by Monte Carlo simulation. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 57:247–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansen PA, Matthews L, Toft N (2007) Geographic risk factors for inter-river dispersal of Gyrodactylus salaris in fjord systems in Norway. Dis Aquat Org 74:139–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jansson H, Ost T (1997) Hybridization between Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (S. trutta) in a restored section of the River Dalalven. Swed Canad J Fish Aquat Sci 54(9):2033–2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnsen BO (2007) Økologiske undersøkelser av Gyrodactylus salaris og fisk i norske vassdrag. Årsrapport 2006 NINA Minirapport 183:1–56 (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  14. Johnsen BO, Hindar K, Balstad T, Hvidsten NA, Jensen AJ, Jensås JG, Syversveen M, Østborg GM (2005) Laks og Gyrodactylus i Vefsna og Driva. Årsrapport 2004. NINA Rapport 34. 33 p (in Norwegian, abstract in English)Google Scholar
  15. Jordan WC, Verspoor E (1993) Incidence of natural hybrids between Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and brown trout, Salmo trutta L. B J Aquac Res 24:373–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1993.tb00559.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klemetsen A, Amundsen PA, Dempson B, Jonsson B, Jonsson N, O’Connell MF, Mortensen E (2003) Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L., brown trout Salmo trutta L. and Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.): a review of aspects of their life histories. Ecol Freshw Fish 12(1):1–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kroglund F, Finstad B, Stefansson SO, Nilsen TO, Kristensen T, Rosseland BO, Teien HC, Salbu B (2008) Exposure to moderate acid water and aluminum reduces Atlantic salmon post-smolt survival. Aquaculture 273(2–3):360–373Google Scholar
  18. Lacroix GL, McCurdy P (1996) Migratory behaviour of post-smolt Atlantic salmon during initial stages of seaward migration. J Fish Biol 49(6):1086–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCormick SD (1993) Methods for nonlethal gill biopsy and measurements of Na+,K+-ATPase activity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:656–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCormick SD, Saunders RL (1987) Preparatory physiological adaptions for marine life of salmonids; osmoregulation, growth and metabolisme. Trans Am Fish Soc 1:211–229Google Scholar
  21. McCormick SD, Hansen LP, Quinn TP, Saunders RL (1998) Movement, migration, and smolting of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(Suppl. 1):77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Molvær J (1990) Tiltaksorientert overvaking av Sunndalsfjorden. Delrapport 6, Vannutskifting og vannkvalitet. NIVA rapport. ISBN82-577-1221-5 (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  23. Nilsen TO, Ebesson LOE, Stefansson SO (2003) Smolting in anadromous and landlocked strains of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 222:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nonnotte G, Boeuf G (1995) Extracellular ionic and acid–base adjustments of Atlantic salmon presmolts and smolts in fresh water and after transfer to seawater: the effects of ovine growt hormone on the acquisition of euryhalinity. J Fish Biol 46:563–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olsen YA, Einarsdottir IE, Nilssen KJ (1995) Metomidate anaesthesia in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, prevents plasma cortisol increase during stress. Aquaculture 134:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pendas AM, Moran P, Martinez JL, Garcia–Vazquez E (1995) Applications of 5S rDNA in Atlantic salmon, brown trout, and in Atlantic salmon x brown trout hybrid identification. Mol Ecol 4:275–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Soleng A, Bakke TA (1997) Salinity tolerance of Gyrodactylus salaris (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea): laboratory studies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1837–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Soleng A, Bakke TA, Hansen LP (1998) Potential for dispersal of Gyrodactylus salaris (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea) by sea-running stages of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): field and laboratory studies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(2):507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Soleng A, Jansen PA, Bakke TA (1999) Transmission of the monogenean Gyrodactylus salaris. Folia Parasitol 46:179–184Google Scholar
  30. Tanguy JM, Ombredane D, Baglinere JL, Prunet P (1994) Aspects of parr–smolt transformation in anadromous and resident forms of brown trout Salmo trutta in comparison with Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Aquaculture 121:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thorstad E, Økland F, Finstad B, Sivertsgaård R, Plantalech N, Bjørn PA, McKinley RS (2007) Fjord migration and survival of wild and hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon and wild brown trout post-smolts. Hydrobiologia 582:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wedemeyer GA (1996) Physiology of Fish in Intensive Culture Systems. Chapman and Hall, New York, 232 pGoogle Scholar
  33. Youngson A, Webb J, Thompson C, Knox DJ (1993) Spawning of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) hybridization of females with brown trout (Salmo trutta). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50(9):1986–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. A. Urke
    • 1
  • J. Koksvik
    • 2
  • J. V. Arnekleiv
    • 2
  • K. Hindar
    • 3
  • F. Kroglund
    • 1
  • T. Kristensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute of Water ResearchTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Section of Natural HistoryNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Norwegian Institute of Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations