Advertisement

20 Dwelling Large-Scale Experiment of Fire Spread in Informal Settlements

  • N. de KokerEmail author
  • R. S. Walls
  • A. Cicione
  • Z. R. Sander
  • S. Löffel
  • J. J. Claasen
  • S. J. Fourie
  • L. Croukamp
  • D. Rush
Article

Abstract

Large-scale urban conflagrations in informal settlements are a frequent global event, however there is a lack of experimental research and knowledge within literature on how informal settlements fires spread to support local or national intervention strategies. This paper, therefore, presents results and analysis of a full-scale fire spread experiment of a mock 20 dwelling test settlement with a 4 by 5 layout aimed at understanding settlement-scale fire spread behaviour. A “fire line” scenario was created by simultaneously igniting four dwellings in a row, and then allowing the fire to propagate through the settlement to replicate fire disasters involving large numbers of homes. Results highlight the critical hazard posed by the close proximity of neighbouring dwellings (1–2 m), with wind playing a primary role in directing and driving the spread process. Even with a relatively mild wind speed of 15–25 km/h, the fire spread through the entire mock settlement within a mere 5 min. Following ignition of a given dwelling, flashover is reached very quickly, with the temperatures reaching more than 1000°C within 1 min, and downwind neighbour structures igniting less than a minute thereafter. The results suggest that multi-dwelling effects are not dominant in these types of fires, but may become meaningful at a larger scale when branding and topography play a role. Findings show that on a global scale fire behaviour is analogous to a wildfire with a continuous fire front moving through an area, although individual dwellings still do follow the distinct phases of enclosure fires, except that collapse occurs more rapidly than in formal structures. This experiment represents one of the larger urban fire tests conducted to date, and the largest informal settlement fire experiment.

Keywords

Full-scale experiments Fire tests Fire spread Informal settlement fires Fire dynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded through the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) EPSRC Grant No. EP/P029582/1. The experiment would not have been possible without the valuable support and cooperation from the Breede Valley Fire Department (especially Fire Chiefs Theo Botha and Josephus Pretorius) and the Western Cape Disaster Management, Fire and Rescue Services.

References

  1. 1.
    Cicione A, Walls RS, Kahanji C (2019) Experimental study of fire spread between multiple full scale informal settlement dwellings. Fire Saf J 105:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FIRESAF.2019.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hurley MJ, Rosenbaum E (2017) Performance-based fire safety design. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quintiere JG (2006) Fundamentals of fire phenomena. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bankoff G, Lübken U, Sand J (2012) Flammable cities: urban conflagration and the making of the modern world. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quintiere JG (2017) Principles of fire behavior. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walls R, Zweig P (2017) Towards sustainable slums: understanding fire engineering in informal settlements. In: Bahei-El-Din Y, Hassan M (eds) Advanced technologies for sustainable systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 4. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walls R, Olivier G, Eksteen R (2017) Informal settlement fires in South Africa: Fire engineering overview and full-scale tests on “shacks”. Fire Saf J 91:997–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antonellis D, Gill D (2018) A framework for fire safety in informal settlements. Arup, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Himoto K, Shinohara M, Sekizawa A, et al (2018) A field experiment on fire spread within a group of model houses. Fire Saf J 96:105–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2018.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heskestad G (1991) A reduced-scale mass fire experiment. Combust Flame 83:293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(91)90076-N CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quintiere JG, Carey AC, Reeves L, McCarthy LK (2017) Scale modeling in fire reconstruction. National Criminal Justice Reference Service (U.S.), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bryner N., Johnsson EL, Pitts WM (1994) Carbon monoxide production in compartment fires: reduced-scale enclosure test facility. NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), Gaithersburg, MDGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adou JK, Brou ADV, Porterie B (2015) Modeling wildland fire propagation using a semi-physical network model. Case Stud Fire Saf 4:11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSFS.2015.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cicione A, Walls RS (2019) Towards a simplified fire dynamic simulator model to analyse fire spread between multiple informal settlement dwellings based on full-scale experiments. In: Interflam proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson LL, Rush D, Wheeler O, et al (2018) Fire detection in informal settlements. In: Chrysoulakis N, Erbertseder T, Zhang Y (eds) Remote sensing technologies and applications in urban environments III. SPIE, Bellingham.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2501885 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Countryman CM (1965) Mass fire characteristics in large-scale tests. Fire Technol 1:303–317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02588473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morrison A (2018) 5 year climate summary for Worcester, Cape Weather, Cape Town, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO (2016) ISO 9705-1:2016–reaction to fire tests—room corner test for wall and ceiling lining products—Part 1: test method for a small room configuration. International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kahanji C, Walls RS, Cicione A (2019) Fire spread analysis for the 2017 Imizamo Yethu informal settlement conflagration in South Africa. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJDRR.2019.101146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buchanan AH, Abu A (2017) Structural design for fire safety. Wiley, Chichester, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hidalgo JP, Maluk C, Cowlard A, et al (2017) A thin skin calorimeter (TSC) for quantifying irradiation during large-scale fire testing. Int J Therm Sci 112:383–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cruz MG, Alexander ME (2019) The 10% wind speed rule of thumb for estimating a wildfire’s forward rate of spread in forests and shrublands. Ann For Sci 76:44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0829-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magnusson SE, Thelandersson S (1970) Temperature-time curves of complete process of fire development: theoretical study of wood fuel fires in enclosed spaces. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica Publ. Office, p 181Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Linn RR, Cunningham P (2005) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. J Geophys Res 110:13107.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beer T (1991) The interaction of wind and fire. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 54:287–308.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trelles J, Pagni P (1997) Fire-induced winds in the 20 October 1991 Oakland hills fire. Fire Saf Sci 5:911–922.  https://doi.org/10.3801/iafss.fss.5-911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Węgrzyński W, Lipecki T (2018) Wind and fire coupled modelling—Part I: literature review. Fire Technol 54:1405–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simeoni A (2016) Wildland Fires. In: Hurley MJ (ed) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, New York, pp 3283–3302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations