Advertisement

Fire Technology

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 343–361 | Cite as

An Efficacy Evaluation of Water Mist Protection Against Solid Combustible Fires in Open Environment

  • Hong-Zeng YuEmail author
  • Xin Liu
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

CEN and NFPA standards have accepted water mist for protecting solid combustible fires more challenging than light hazard fires in open environment, but with little data in the public domain to support such applications. Therefore, a series of exploratory experiments was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of fire suppression in open environment by water mist sprays for a rack storage of corrugated cardboard cartons on wood pallets (Fire A), and for a palletized storage of cartoned plastics stacked on wood pallets (Fire B). Both are in the accepted hazard categories by both standards. Representative water mist sprays were employed to provide water application densities of 4.1 mm/min and 6.1 mm/min for Fire A, and 8.1 mm/min for Fire B. These sprays had downward thrust forces ranging from 18 N to 73 N per spray, and volume median droplet diameters from 75 µm to 345 µm. A standard ½-in. pendent sprinkler was also employed to provide the suppression performance references for these two fire hazards. In each experiment, four open sprinklers or nozzles were centered 1.7 m above the fuel array with nozzle spacing ranging from 2.6 × 2.6 m to 3 × 3 m. All experiments were conducted under a 20-MW calorimeter with no ceiling presence. Water discharge in each experiment was started at a designated fire convective heat release rate of 1000 kW. The experiments indicated that, for the same application density, not all water mist sprays having different characteristics would lead to a comparable fire suppression result. Therefore, each water mist system should be tested individually for the same intended protection. Furthermore, the results showed that when water mist protection was effective, it required application densities comparable to those of sprinkler protection to provide comparable fire suppression results in open environment under the present experimental conditions.

Keywords

Water mist protection Sprinkler protection Rack storage Palletized storage Fire suppression Fire control 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The helpful comments and suggestions provided by Drs. Sergey Dorofeev and Franco Tamanini of FM Global on this article are greatly appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    IMO A.800(19) (1995) Revised Guidelines for Approvals of Sprinkler Systems Equivalent to That Referred to SOLAS Regulation II-2/12, International Maritime Organization, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bill RG, Ural EA (1999) Water mist protection of combustion turbine enclosures. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on fire safety science, pp 458–468Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu PK, Alpert RL (1998) Recent advances in fine water spray technology: protection of an open semiconductor wet bench. 14th Meeting of the UJNR Panel on Fire Research and Safety, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Z, Carpenter DW, Kim AK (2005) Application of water mist to extinguish large oil pool fires for industrial cooker protection. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on fire safety science, pp 741–752Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vuorisalo M (2008) Implementation of water mist systems in road tunnels—project case studies. In: 3rd international symposium on tunnel safety and security, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu Z, Kim AK (2001) A review of water mist fire suppression technology: part II—application studies. J Fire Prot Eng 11: 16–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arvidson M (2014) Large-scale water spray and water mist fire suppression system tests for the protection of ro-ro cargo decks on ships. Fire Technol 50: 589–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    CEN/TS 14972 (2011) Fixed firefighting systems—watermist systems—design and installation. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    NFPA 750 (2014) Standard on water mist fire protection systems. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    NFPA 13 (2016) Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu H-Z, Lee JL, Kung H-C (1994) Suppression of rack-storage fires by water. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on fire safety science, pp 901–912Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    You H-Z, Kung H-C (1984) Strong buoyant plumes of growing rack storage fires. In: Proceedings of the 20th symposium (international) on combustion. The Combustion Institute, pp 1547–1554Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heskestad G (1986) Fire plume entrainment according to two competing assumptions. In: Proceedings of the 21st symposium (international) on combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp 111–120Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stockham JD, Fochtman EG (1977) Particle size analysis. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schlichting H (1968) Boundary layer theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ertesvag IS, Magnussen BF (2000) The eddy dissipation turbulence energy cascade model. Combust Sci Technol 159: 213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wagnanski I, Fiedler H (1969) Some measurements in the self-preserving jet. J Fluid Mech 38(3): 577–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tewarson A, Chaos M, Khan MM (2016) Combustion characteristics of materials and generation of fire products. In: Hurley M (ed) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, New York, Chap. 36Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Croce PA (1976) A Method for improved measurement of gas concentration histories in rapidly developing fires. Combust Sci Technol 14: 221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nam S (1996) Development of a computational model simulating the interaction between a fire plume and a sprinkler spray. Fire Saf J 26: 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rasbash DJ (1962) The extinction of fires by water sprays. Fire Res Abstr Rev 4: 28–53Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FM GlobalNorwoodUSA
  2. 2.Tianjin Fire Research InstituteTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations