Advertisement

Fire Technology

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 1585–1608 | Cite as

Smouldering Combustion in Loose-Fill Wood Fibre Thermal Insulation: An Experimental Study

  • Anne Steen-HansenEmail author
  • Ragni Fjellgaard Mikalsen
  • Ulla Eidissen Jensen
Article

Abstract

A bench-scale experimental setup has been used to study the conditions necessary for smouldering ignition in four types of loose-fill wood fibre thermal insulation, and to study the development of the smouldering process. The products varied with regard to wood species, grain size and fire retardant chemical additives. The test material was placed in an insulated open top container and heated from below. Temperatures within the sample and mass loss were measured during the tests. Both the fibre size and the level of added fire retardant seem to influence the smouldering ignition. Two different types of smouldering were identified in this study. Materials undergoing smouldering Type 1 obtained maximum temperatures in the range 380°C to 440°C and a total mass loss of 40 wt% to 50 wt%. Materials undergoing smouldering Type 2 obtained maximum temperatures in the range 660°C to 700°C and a total mass loss of 80 wt% to 90 wt%. This implies that Type 2 smouldering involves secondary char oxidation, which represents a risk for transition to flaming combustion and thereby a considerable fire hazard. This has been an exploratory project and the results must therefore be considered as indicative. The findings may, however, have implications for fire safety in the practical use of loose-fill wood fibre insulation in buildings, and further experimental studies should be performed with this in mind to obtain more knowledge about the topic.

Keywords

Fire Safety Smouldering combustion Wood fibre Loose-fill thermal insulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the project management of the EMRIS (Emerging Risks from Smoldering Fires) project sincerely for the financial and scientific support for the project presented here. The EMRIS project is supported by the Research Council of Norway, Project 238329. The elemental and proximate analysis of the fuel given in Table 1 was provided by the group of Prof. Ulrich Krause at the Department of Process Safety and Environmental Engineering at Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany.

References

  1. 1.
    Palumbo M (2015) Contribution to the development of new bio-based thermal insulation materials made from vegetal pith and natural binders: hygrothermal performance, fire reaction and mould growth resistance. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DW Belles (1993) Loose-fill cellulose insulation—an aging problem. J Appl Fire Sci 3(3):295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLees M (2008) ‘Going Green’ May Make You ‘See Red’. Firehouse, pp 46–49. https://www.firehouse.com/operations-training/article/10503457/going-green-may-make-you-see-red
  4. 4.
    Morelock JC (2006) Overhauling when cellulose insulation is present. Fire Eng 159(3):175Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rein G (2016) Smoldering combustion. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 5th ed., vol 1. Springer, pp 581–600Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ohlemiller TJ (1985) Modeling of smoldering combustion propagation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 11(4):277–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rein G (2009) Smouldering combustion phenomena in science and technology. Int Rev Chem Eng 1:3–18Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drysdale D (2011) An introduction to fire dynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moussa NA, Toong TY, Garris CA (1977) Mechanism of smoldering of cellulosic materials. Symp (Int) Combust 16(1):1447–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He F, Yi W, Li Y, Zha J, Luo B (2014) Effects of fuel properties on the natural downward smoldering of piled biomass powder: experimental investigation. Biomass Bioenergy 67:288–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krause U, Schmidt M, Lohrer C (2006) A numerical model to simulate smouldering fires in bulk materials and dust deposits. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19(2–3):218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Putzeys O, Bar-Ilan A, Rein G, Fernandez-Pello AC, Urban DL (2007) The role of secondary char oxidation in the transition from smoldering to flaming. Proc Combust Inst 31:2669–2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palmer KN (1957) Smouldering combustion in dusts and fibrous materials. Combust Flame 1(2):129–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hagen BC (2013) Onset of smoldering and transition to flaming fire. PhD thesis, Bergen University, BergenGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ohlemiller TJ (1990) Forced smolder propagation and the transition to flaming in cellulosic insulation. Combust Flame 81(3):354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hagen BC, Frette V, Kleppe G, Arntzen BJ (2015) Transition from smoldering to flaming fire in short cotton samples with asymmetrical boundary conditions. Fire Saf J 71:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCarter RJ (1978) Smoldering combustion of wood fibers: cause and prevention. JFFLAO 9(1):119–126Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lowden LA, Hull TR (2013) Flammability behaviour of wood and a review of the methods for its reduction. Fire Sci Rev 2:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilkie CA, Morgan AB (2009) Fire retardancy of polymeric materials. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    He F, Behrendt F (2011) Experimental investigation of natural smoldering of char granules in a packed bed. Fire Saf J 46(7):406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krause U, Schmidt M (2000) Propagation of smouldering in dust deposits caused by glowing nests or embedded hot bodiesJ Loss Prev Process Ind 13:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fernandez Anez N (2016) Analysis of the flammability properties of solid fuels. PhD thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, MadridGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jensen UE (2016) The development of smouldering combustion in combustible building insulation materials. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hagen BC, Frette V, Kleppe G, Arntzen BJ (2011) Onset of smoldering in cotton: effects of density. Fire Saf J 46(3):73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hagen BC, Frette V, Kleppe G, Arntzen BJ (2013) Effects of heat flux scenarios on smoldering in cotton. Fire Saf J 61:144–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Torero J, Fernandez-Pello A, Kitano M (1993) Opposed forced flow smoldering of polyurethane foam. Combust Sci Technol 91(1–3):95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu D, Xinyan H, Norman F, Verplaetsen F, Berghmans J, Van den Bulck E (2015) Experimental investigation on the self-ignition behaviour of coal dust accumulations in oxy-fuel combustion system. Fuel 160:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Valdés VR, Mikalsen RF, Steen Hansen A (2017) Smouldering fires in wood pellets: the effect of varying the airflow. In: Dederichs A (ed) Nordic fire & safety days, book of abstracts. Copenhagen. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1143221/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  29. 29.
    Valdés VR (2017) Experimental study of smouldering fires in wood pellets. Master thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Madsen D et al (2016) Emerging risks in smoldering fires: initial results from the EMRIS project. In: Presented at the 14th international conference and exhibition on fire science and engineering, Interflam, Windsor, UK, 2016, vol 2, pp 1345–1356Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mikalsen RF, Hagen BC, Steen-Hansen A, Frette V (2017) Extinguishing smoldering fires in wood pellets through cooling. In: presented at the 5th Magdeburg fire and explosions days 2017, Magdeburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mikalsen RF, Hagen BC, Steen-Hansen A, Frette V (2017) Smoldering combustion-from pulsations to extinguishment. In: Presented at the 12th international symposium on fire safety science IAFSS, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18(1):50–60MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    He F, Behrendt F (2011) Experimental investigation of natural smoldering of char granules in a packed bed. Fire Saf J 46:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang X, Rein G (2018) Upward-and-downward spread of smoldering peat fire. In: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.125
  36. 36.
    Huang X, Rein G (2016) Thermochemical conversion of biomass in smouldering combustion across scales: the roles of heterogeneous kinetics, oxygen and transport phenomena. Biores Technol 207:409–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    ASTM C 739—03 (2003) Standard Specification for Cellulosic Fiber Loose-Fill Thermal Insulation. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    16 CFR 1209 - Interim Safety Standard for Cellulose Insulation. US Government Publishing Office, USA, 2001Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    BS 5803: Part 4: (1985) Thermal insulation for use in pitched roof spaces in dwellings. Part 4. Methods for determining flammability and resistance to smouldering. BSI - British standards InstitutionGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    NT FIRE 035 (1988) Flammability and smouldering resistance of loose-fill thermal insulation. Approved 1988-02. NORDTESTGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    CAN/ULC-S129-15 (2015) Standard method of test for smoulder resistance of insulation (basket method)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    EN 16733:2016 (2016) Reaction to fire for building products—determination of a building product’s propensity to undergo continuous smouldering. CEN-CENELEC, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Huang X, Restuccia F, Gramola M, Rein G (2016) Experimental study of the formation and collapse of an overhang in the lateral spread of smouldering peat fires. Combust Flame 168:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RISE Fire Research TrondheimTillerNorway
  2. 2.Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (HVL)HaugesundNorway
  3. 3.Otto von Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
  4. 4.Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations