Investigating the Application of a Hybrid Space Discretisation for Urban Scale Evacuation Simulation
The devastating effects of wildfires cannot be overlooked; these include massive resettlement of people, destruction of property and loss of lives. The considerable distances over which wild fires spread and the rates at which these fires can spread is a major concern as this places considerable challenges on the evacuation mechanisms that need to be put in place. It is therefore crucial for personnel, involved in evacuation planning, to obtain reliable estimates of evacuation times faster than real time, to assist their decision making in response to actual unfolding of events. In this work, we present a hybrid approach, which we refer to as the Hybrid Spatial Discretisation (HSD) for large scale evacuation simulation. The HSD integrates the three spatial representation techniques typically used for representing space usage in evacuation models; namely Coarse regions, Fine nodes and Continuous regions. In this work, we describe the core models constituting the HSD coupled with the approaches used for representing the transition of agents across the different spatial types. Using a large scale case, we demonstrate how the HSD can be used to obtain higher resolution of results where it is most required while optimising the use of available computational resources for the overall simulation. The HSD is seen to provide improvements in run times of more than 40% when compared to modelling the whole area using just the Fine node method.
KeywordsCity evacuation Hybrid evacuation model Hybrid spatial discretisation Urban scale egress simulation
- 1.WorldAtlas (2018) Largest fires in the world. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-blaze-of-oblivion-the-top-deadliest-wildfires-in-the-world.html. Accessed Feb 2018.
- 2.Cohen, J. (2008). The wildland–urban interface fire problem, A Consequence of the Fire Exclusion Paradigm. https://foresthistory.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Cohen.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.
- 3.Westhaver A (2016) Why some homes survived: learning from the fort McMurray wildfire disaster. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Ontario.Google Scholar
- 4.Lindell MK (2008) EMBLEM2: an empirically based large scale evacuation time estimate model. Transp Res A 42(2008):140–154.Google Scholar
- 6.Kuligowski ED , Peacock RD , Hoskins BL (2010) A review of building evacuation models, Technical Note 1680, 2nd edn. Fire Research Division Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington.Google Scholar
- 11.Vassalos D, Guarin L, Vassalos GC, Bole M, Kim H, Majumder J (2003) Advanced evacuation analysis—testing the ground on ships. In: Proceedings of conference on pedestrian and evacuation dynamics, Greenwich 2003.Google Scholar
- 12.Gloor C, Stucki P, Nagel K (2004) Hybrid techniques for pedestrian simulations. In: Proceedings of 4th Swiss transport research conference, Ascona 2004.Google Scholar
- 18.Galea ER, Wang Z, Veeraswamy A, Jia F, Lawrence PJ, Ewer J (2008) Coupled fire/evacuation analysis of the station nightclub fire. In: Proceedings of 9th IAFSS symposium Karlsruhe 2008, pp 465–476.Google Scholar
- 20.Chooramun N (2011) Implementing a hybrid spatial discretisation within an agent based evacuation model. Thesis, University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
- 23.Oberhagemann D (2012) Static and dynamic crowd densities at major public events, Technical Report VFDB TB 13-01, German Fire Protection Association.Google Scholar
- 24.Anderson J , Shiers D, Steele K (2009) The green guide to specification, 4th edn. IHS BRE Press, Watford.Google Scholar
- 25.Fruin J (1971) Pedestrian and planning design. Educational Services Division, Elevator World Inc., Alabama.Google Scholar
- 26.Kholshevnikov V, Samoshin D (2008) Laws of motion of pedestrian flow-basics for evacuation modeling and management. In: Environmental security, NATO science for peace and security series C, pp 417–442.Google Scholar
- 27.Nelson H, Mowrer F (2002) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda.Google Scholar
- 28.Reynolds CW (1999) Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. in: the proceedings of game developers conference 1999, San Jose. Miller Freeman Game Group, San Francisco, pp 763–782.Google Scholar
- 29.Buckmann LT, Leather J (1994) Modelling station congestion the PEDROUTE way. Traffic Eng Control 35:373–377.Google Scholar
- 30.Transport Watch UK (2010) Facts sheet 3: Widths and headroom. http://www.transport-watch.co.uk/transport-fact-sheet-3.htm. Accessed 29 Nov 2010.
- 31.Department for Transport (2010) Inclusive Mobility. http://www.dft.gov.uk/transportforyou/access/peti/inclusivemobility?page=3. Accessed 29 Nov 2010.
- 32.Ronchi E, Rein G, Gwynne SMV, Intini P, Wadhwani R (2017) Framework for an integrated simulation system for wildland–urban interface fire evacuation. Proc Int Conf Res Adv Technol Fire Saf 2017:119–134.Google Scholar
- 33.Wood N, Jones J, Peters J, Richards K (2018) Pedestrian evacuation modeling to reduce vehicle use for distant tsunami evacuations in Hawai'i. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct (in press).Google Scholar