Fire Technology

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 555–577 | Cite as

Risk Analysis and Assessment to Enhance Safety in a Smart Kitchen

  • Rami YaredEmail author
  • Bessam Abdulrazak


Cooking activity is accompanied with several risks, mainly for elderly people due to attention and memory impairment. Literature reveals that the kitchen is the second most common place for domestic accidents. We argue that enhancing safety during cooking activities could be achieved via designing a cooking-safe environment based on insightful risk analysis and assessment study. This paper presents our study on risk analysis and assessment during cooking, in order to build a cooking-safe environment. The study is based on theoretical and real-world experimentations. Risk analysis and assessment enabled us to determine the three major risks (i.e., fire, burn and intoxication by gas/smoke) and the pertinent parameters to quantify these risks. The results reveal that the pertinent parameters are: concentrations of volatile organic compounds, alcohol, and carbon monoxide gases in the cooking smoke, utensil temperature, burner temperature, relative humidity, and presence of a utensil on burner. We present in details our study on risk analysis and assessment, including the methodology and the findings.


Risk analysis and assessment Hazard Cooking Safety Fire Burn Carbon monoxide poisoning Smart oven Sensors 



We are grateful to all our students who have participated in this project. In particular, Camille Goujeau and Thomas Tessier for their excellent work. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable reviews that helped improve the paper.


  1. 1.
    Yared R, Abdulrazak B (2016) Ambient technology to assist elderly people in indoor risks. Computers 5:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yared R, Mallat H, Abdulrazak B (2015) Ambient technology to support elderly people in outdoor risk situations. In: Helfert M, Holzinger A, Ziefle M, Fred A, O’Donoghue J, Röcker C (eds) Communications in computer and information science, vol 578. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–56Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mallat H, Yared R, Abdulrazak B (2015) Assistive technology for risks affecting elderly people in outdoor environment. In: International conference on information and communication technologies for ageing well and e-health, ICT4AgeingWell, pp 5–16Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahrens M (2008) Home smoke alarms: the data as context for decision. Fire Technol 44(4):313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Office of the Fire Marshal - Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services (2009) Reducing residential stovetop fires in OntarioGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lushaka B, Zalok E (2014) Development of a sensing device to reduce the risk from kitchen fires. Fire Technol 50(3):791–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hall JR (2006) Home cooking fire patterns and trends. National Fire Protection Association, QuincyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yared R, Abdulrazak B, Tessier T, Mabilleau P (2015) Cooking risk analysis to enhance safety of elderly people in smart kitchen. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on PErvasive technologies related to assistive environments—PETRA’15Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yared R, Abdulrazak B (2015) Toward context-aware smart oven to prevent cooking risks in kitchen of elderly people. In: Communications in computer and information science, CCIS, vol 578. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 57–77Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdulrazak B, Yared R, Tessier T, Mabilleau P (2015) Toward pervasive computing system to enhance safety of ageing people in smart kitchen. In: ICT4AgeingWell 2015—International conference on information and communication technologies for ageing well and e-health, pp 17–28Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Omaki E, Shields WC, Frattaroli S, McDonald E, Jones V, Gielen A (2017) Six-month follow-up of lithium-battery smoke alarms and self-reported reasons for disabling. Inj Prev 23(1):67–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organisation (2012) Interesting facts about ageing. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marzocchi W, Garcia-Aristizabal A, Gasparini P, Mastellone ML, Di Ruocco A (2012) Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy. Nat Hazards 62(2):551–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wijayasinghe M, Makey T (1997) Cooking oil: a home fire hazard in Alberta, Canada. Fire Technol 33:140–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagashima T, Mammoto A, Yamauchi Y, Watanabe K (1988) Optimization of sensitivity characteristics of photoelectric smoke detector to various smokes. Fire Saf Sci 3:319Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cleary T (2014) Performance of dual photoelectric/ionization smoke alarms in full-scale fire tests. Fire Technol 50(3):753–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen S, Bao H, Zeng X, Yang Y (2003) Research of fire detection method based on multi-sensor data fusion. In IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and software engineering CiSE, vol 4, pp 3775–3780Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Milke JA, Hulcher ME, Worrell CL, Gottuk DT, Williams FW (2003) Investigation of multi-sensor algorithms for fire detection. Fire Technol 39(4):363–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hagen B, Milke J (2000) The use of gaseous fire signatures as a mean to detect fires. Fire Saf J 34:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnsson E (1995) Study of technology for detecting pre-ignition conditions of cooking-related fires associated with electric and gas ranges and cooktops. Final reportGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Milke JA, McAvoy TJ (1995) Analysis of signature patterns for discriminating fire detection with multiple sensors. Fire Technol 31(2):120–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bashyal S, Venayagamoorthy GK, Paudel B (2008) Embedded neural network for fire classification using an array of gas sensors. In: 2008 IEEE sensors applications symposiumGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Charumporn B, Yoshioka M, Fujinaka T, Omatu S (2003) Early stage fire detection using reliable metal oxide gas sensors and artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks, vol 4, pp 3185–3188Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yuan MY, Green JR, Goubran R (2013) Thermal imaging for assisted living at home: Improving kitchen safety. J Med Biol Eng 33(4):380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Runyan C, Casteel C, Perkis D, Black C (2005) Unintentional injuries in the home in the United States: part I: mortality. Am J Prev Med 28:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ho C-T, Shahidi F (2005) Flavor components of fats and oils. In: Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol 1, pp 387–411Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Evans GJ, Peers A, Sabaliauskas K (2008) Particle dose estimation from frying in residential settings. Indoor Air 18(6):499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jiang X, Zhu S, Wu Y, Huai H (2009) The effects of cooking oil fume condensates (COFCs) on the vegetative growth of Salvinia natans (L.) All. J Hazard Mater 172(1):240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu Z, Kim AK, Carpenter D, Kanabus-Kaminska JM, Yen PL (2004) Extinguishment of cooking oil fires by water mist fire suppression systems. Fire Technol 40(4):309–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fennema OR (1996) Food chemistry, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR, Simonelt BRT (1991) Sources of fine organic aerosol. 1. Charbroilers and meat cooking operations. Environ Sci Technol 25(6):1112–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Varghese SK, Gangamma S, Patil RS, Sethi V (2005) Particulate respiratory dose to indian women from domestic cooking. Aerosol Sci Technol 39(12):1201–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao Y, Hu M, Slanina S, Zhang Y (2007) Chemical compositions of fine particulate organic matter emitted from Chinese cooking. Environ Sci Technol 41(1):99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Svedahl S, Svendsen K, Qvenild T, Sjaastad AK, Hilt B (2009) Short term exposure to cooking fumes and pulmonary function. J Occup Med Toxicol 4:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Turner DG, Leman CJ, Jordan MH (1989) Cooking-related burn injuries in the elderly preventing the ‘granny gown’ burn. J Burn Care Rehabil 10(4):356–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lewandowski R, Pegg S, Fortier K, Skimmings A (1993) Burn injuries in the elderly. Burns 19(6):513–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moritz AR, Henriques FC (1947) Studies of thermal injury: the relative importance of time and surface temperature in the causation of cutaneous burns. Am J Pathol 23:695–720Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Barsan ME (2007) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Pocket guide to chemical hazards. Report no 2005-149Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weaver LK (2009) Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med 360:1217–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Prockop LD, Chichkova RI (2007) Carbon monoxide intoxication: an updated review. J Neurol Sci 262(1–2):122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations