Fire Technology

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 649–672 | Cite as

Guidance for the Model User on Representing Human Behavior in Egress Models

  • Erica D. Kuligowski
  • Steven M. V. Gwynne
  • Michael J. Kinsey
  • Lynn Hulse
Article

Abstract

Structures are currently designed and constructed in accordance with prescriptive and performance-based (PBD) methodologies to ensure a certain level of occupant safety during fire emergencies. The performance-based approach requires the quantification of both ASET (Available Safe Egress Time) and RSET (Required Safe Egress Time) to determine the degree of safety provided. This article focuses on the RSET side of the equation, for which a fire protection or fire safety engineer would use some type of egress modelling approach to estimate evacuation performance. Often, simple engineering equations are applied to estimate the RSET value. Over time, more sophisticated computational tools have appeared—that go beyond basic flow calculations; e.g. simulating individual agent movement. Irrespective of the approach adopted, appropriate and accurate representation of human behavior in response to fire within these approaches is limited, mainly due to the lack of a comprehensive conceptual model of evacuee decision-making and behavior during fire emergencies. This article initially presents the set of behavioral statements, or mini-theories, currently available from various fire and disaster studies, organized using the overarching theory of decision-making and human behavior in disasters. Once presented, guidance is provided on how these behavioral statements might be incorporated into an evacuation model, in order to better represent human behavior in fire within the safety analysis being performed. The intent here is to improve the accuracy of the results produced by performance-based calculations and analyses.

Keywords

Egress model Performance-based design Human behavior Fires Required safe egress time Egress Modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Department for Communities and Local Government (2006) Approved Document B(fire safety), vol 1. Dwelling Houses, The Building Regulations 2010, England, UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fire-safety-approved-document-b. Accessed August 2013.
  2. 2.
    Shook and Stone (2013) Small fire reported in the stratosphere hotel and Casino. http://www.shookandstone.com/Personal-Injury-Blog/2013/July/Small-Fire-Reported-in-the-Stratosphere-Hotel-an.aspx. Accessed July 2013.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Durso F (2012), Upgrading liberty, NFPA journal, July/August. http://www.nfpa.org/newsandpublications/nfpa-journal/2012/july-august-2012/features/crowning-achievement. Accessed May 2012.
  5. 5.
    Building Design + Construction (2013) Mall of America will double in size after $2.5 billion expansion. http://www.bdcnetwork.com/mall-america-will-double-size-after-25-billion-expansion. Accessed July 2013.
  6. 6.
    Gwynne SMV, Rosenbaum ER (2009) Employing the hydraulic model in assessing emergency movement. In: DiNenno et al. (eds) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 4th edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 3–373–3–396.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galea ER, Lawrence PJ, Gwynne S, Filippidis L, Blackshields D, Cooney D (2011) Buildingexodus v5.0, user/technical guide, University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuligowski ED, Peacock RD, Hoskins BA (2010) Review of building evacuation models. 2nd edn. TechNote 1680, NIST.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gwynne SMV (2012) Translating behavioral theory of human response into modeling practice. NISTGCR—12-972, National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuligowski ED (2011) Terror defeated: occupant sensemaking, decision-making and protective action in the 2001 World Trade Center Disaster. University of Colorado, PhD Dissertation, http://gradworks.umi.com/3453742.pdf.
  11. 11.
    Kuligowski, ED (2016) Human behavior in fire. In: Hurley MJ (ed) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 5th edn. Springer, New York, pp 2070–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuligowski ED (2009) The process of human behavior in fires. Technical note 1632, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Canter D (1980) Fires and human behaviour. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gwynne SMV, Hulse, LM, Kinsey MJ (2015) Guidance for the model developer on representing human behavior in egress models, fire technology. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindell MK, Perry RW (2004) Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sorensen JH, Vogt-Sorenson B (2006) Community processes: warning and evacuation. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New York, pp 183–199.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mileti DS, Peek L (2001) Hazards and sustainable development in the United States. Risk Manag Int J 3(1):61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tierney KJ, Lindell MK, Perry RW (2001) Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drabek TE (1986) Human system responses to disaster: an inventory of sociological findings. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mileti DS, Drabek TE, Haas JE (1975) Human systems in extreme environments: a sociological perspective. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Proulx G, Latour JC, MacLaurin JW (1994) Housing evacuation of mixed abilities occupants. IRC-IR-661, Internal Report, Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bruck D (2001) The who, what, where and why of waking to fire alarms: a review. Fire Saf J 36:623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990-ADA-42 U.S. Code Chapter 126.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mileti DS, Sorensen JH (1990) Communication of emergency public warnings: a social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Proulx G, Sime JD (1991) To prevent ‘Panic’ in an underground emergency: why not tell people the truth?. Fire Safety Sci 3:843–852. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.3-843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Okabe K, Mikami S (1982) A study on the socio-psychological effect of a false warning of the Tokai earthquake in Japan. A Paper presented at the Tenth World Congress of Sociology, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Helweg-Larsen M, Shepperd JA (2001) Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? a review of the literature. Personal Social Psychol Rev 5(1):74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klein G (1999) sources of power: how people make decisions. The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Latane B, Darley JM (1970) The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton-Century Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of environment. Psychol Rev 63(2):129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sime J (1984) Escape behavior. In: Fire: panic’ or affiliation?, PhD Thesis, Department of Psychology, University Of Surrey.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology, 1st Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nilsson D (2009) Exit choice in fire emergencies—influencing choice of exit with flashing lights, Lund University, Doctoral Thesis.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bryan JL (2002) Behavioral response to fire and smoke. In: DiNenno PJ (ed) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 3–315–3–315.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Proulx G (2002) Movement of people: the evacuation timing. In DiNenno PJ (ed) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 3–342–3–341.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tong D, Canter D (1985) The decision to evacuate: a study of the motivations which contribute to evacuation in the event of fire. Fire Saf J 9(3):257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (1972) When disaster strikes (it isn’t much like what you’ve heard and read about). Psychol Today 5:67–70.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fischer III HW (1998) Response to disaster: Fact versus fiction and its perpetuation, the sociology of disaster, 2nd edn. University Press of America, New York.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Santos G, Aguirre BE (2004) Critical review of emergency evacuation simulation models. In: Peacock RD, Kuligowski ED (eds) Workshop on building occupant movement during fire emergencies. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, pp 27–52.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    McPhail C (1991) The myth of the madding crowd. Walter de Gruyter, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gwynne S, Galea ER, Lawrence PJ, Owen M, Filippidis L (1999) A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment. Build Environ 34:741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gwynne SMV (2007) Optimizing fire alarm notification for high risk groups. Summary Report, prepared for The Fire Protection Research Foundation, NFPA, Quincy, MA.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mileti DS (1974) A normative causal model analysis of disaster warning response. University of Colorado, Department of Sociology, Boulder.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Groner N (2009) A situation awareness analysis for the use of elevators during fire emergencies. In: 4th International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire: Conference Proceedings. London: Interscience Communications, pp 61–72.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Perry RW, Lindell MK, Greene MR (1981) Evacuation planning in emergency management. Lexington Books, Lexington.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kunreuther H (1991) A conceptual framework for managing low probability events. Center for Risk and Decision Processes, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gwynne S, Galea ER, Lawrence PJ, Owen M, Filippidis L (1999) Adaptive decision-making in building EXODUS. J Appl Fire Sci 8:265–289.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thompson CM, Forester JA, Cooper SE, Bley DC, Wreathall J (1997) The application of ATHEANA: a technique for human error analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Sixth Annual Human Factors Meeting, pp 9–13-9–17.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Turner RH, Killian LM (1987) Collective behavior, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Connell R (2001) Collective behavior in the September 11, 2001 evacuation of the World Trade Center. Preliminary Paper #313. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center, Newark.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Karau SJ, Kelly JR (1992) The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. J Exp Soc Psychol 28(6):542–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zakay D (1993) The impact of time perception processes on decision making under time stress. In: Svenson O, Maule AJ (eds) Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. Plenum Press, New York, pp 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Janis IL (1982) Decision making under stress. In: Goldberger L, Breznitz S (eds) Handbook of stress: theoretical and clinical aspects. The Free Press, New York, pp 69–87.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ben Zur H, Breznitz SJ (1981) The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica 47(2):89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gigerenzer G, Selten R (2001) Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vaughan D (1999) The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Ann Rev Sociol 25:271–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1977) Behavioral decision theory. Ann Rev Psychol 28:1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Peterson CR, Beach LR (1967) Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychol Bull 68(1):29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Sci 185:1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Flin R, Salas E, Strub M, Martin L (1997) Decision making under stress. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, England.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Orasanu J, Fischer U (1997) Finding decisions in natural environments: the view from the cockpit. In: Zsambok C, Klein G (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 343–358.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Janis IL, Mann L (1977) Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hammond KR, Adelman L (1976) Science, values, and human judgment. Science 194:389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Slovic P, Kunreuther H, White GF (1974) Decision processes, rationality, and adjustments to natural hazards. In: GF White (ed) Natural hazards. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 187–205.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Averill JD, Mileti DS, Peacock RD, Kuligowski ED, Groner N, Proulx G, Reneke PA, Nelson HE (2005) Federal Building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: occupant behavior, egress, and emergency communications. Report NCSTAR 1-7. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg. http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-7.pdf.
  67. 67.
    Isner MS, Klem TJ (1993) World Trade Center explosion and fire, New York, New York, February 26, 1993. Fire Investigation Report. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bryan, JL (1982) Human behavior in the MGM grand hotel fire. Fire J 76:37–48.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Best RL (1977) Reconstruction of a tragedy: the Beverly Hills supper club fire. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Fahy RF, Proulx G (1997) Human behavior in the World Trade Center evacuation. In: Hasemi Y (ed) Fire safety science—Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium. London: Interscience Communications Ltd, pp 713–724.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mileti DS, O’Brien PW (1992) Warnings during disasters: normalizing communicated risk. Soc Probl 39(1):40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Aguirre BE, Wenger D, Vigo G (1998) A test of the emergent norm theory of collective behavior. Sociol Forum 13(2):301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nilsson, D, Fahy, R (2016) Selecting scenarios for deterministic fire safety engineering analysis: life safety for occupants. In: Hurley MJ (ed) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, Fifth edn. Springer, New York, pp 2047–2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gwynne, SMV, Boyce KE (2016) Engineering data. In: Hurley MJ (ed) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 5th edn. Springer, New York, pp 2429–2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica D. Kuligowski
    • 1
  • Steven M. V. Gwynne
    • 2
  • Michael J. Kinsey
    • 3
  • Lynn Hulse
    • 4
  1. 1.National Institute of Standards and TechnologyGaithersburgUSA
  2. 2.National Research Council CanadaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.ArupLondonUK
  4. 4.University of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations