Fire Technology

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 971–993 | Cite as

Evaluation of a Wireless Sensor Network with Low Cost and Low Energy Consumption for Fire Detection and Monitoring

  • Xavier SilvaniEmail author
  • Frédéric Morandini
  • Eric Innocenti
  • Sylvestre Peres


Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) may offer the opportunity to eliminate most of the extension cables and wires in digital systems, allowing operation far from any infrastructure. This opportunity coincides with a great increase in cost-effectiveness in an overall fire detection and monitoring system for forests, buildings or industrial sites. Our purpose is to evaluate this opportunity. After presenting the three main technologies for wireless communications to non experts, we retained the Zigbee protocol for this study. We then investigated whether the use of a WSN with this protocol is valuable for measuring heat quantities during a fire spreading over a vegetation fuel bed. Experiments are performed under both lab scale indoor and real outdoor conditions. The method consists of comparing temperatures and radiant heat fluxes gained with the wireless technology with those recorded at the same location through a wired data acquisition system. Delays due to the wireless radio communications are identified and explained. We also observe information loss for measurements performed in the fire front. Finally, we highlight that fires can be detected satisfactorily by WSN equipment in indoor and outdoor conditions. However, we also show that measurement accuracy obtained from wired systems cannot be obtained with the present wireless technology, and we do not recommend their use at the present time for fire monitoring and mitigation.


Fire metrology Wireless sensor network Lab scale experiments Outdoor experiments 



The authors are grateful to Electricité de France for the financial support allowing this study. They also specially thank the coordination of technical staff between our laboratory and EDF, Antoine Pieri and Bernard Bucai, for their valuable help during experiments. Many special thanks also to Professor Khaldoun Al-Agha and Dr. Tuan Dang for their valuable information on wireless technology.


  1. 1.
    Samad T, McLaughlin P, Lu J (2007) System architecture for process automation: review and trends. J Process Control 17: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morandini F, Silvani X, Rossi L, Santoni P-A, Simeoni A, Balbi J-H, Louis Rossi J, Marcelli T (2006) Fire spread experiment across Mediterranean shrub: influence of wind on flame front properties. Fire Saf J 41: 229–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santoni PA, Simeoni A, Rossi JL, Bosseur F, Morandini F, Silvani X, Balbi JH, Cancellieri D, Rossi L (2006) Instrumentation of wildland fire: characterisation of a fire spreading through a Mediterranean shrub. Fire Saf J 41: 171–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Silvani X, Morandini F (2009) Fire spread experiments in the field: temperature and heat fluxes measurements. Fire Saf J 44: 279–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler BW (1993) Experimental measurements of radiant heat fluxes from simulated wildfire flames. In: Foresters SoA (ed). Experimental measurements of radiant heat fluxes from simulated wildfire flames. Jekyll Island.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frankman D, Webb BW, Butler BW, Jimenez D, Harrington M (2012) The effect of sampling rate on interpretation of the temporal characteristics of radiative and convective heating in wildland flames. Int J Wildland Fire.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deckers X, Haga S, Sette B, Merci B (2013) Smoke control in case of fire in a large car park: full-scale experiments. Fire Saf J 57: 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bryant RA (2009) A comparison of gas velocity measurements in a full-scale enclosure fire. Fire Saf J 44: 793–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silvani X, Morandini F, Muzy J-F (2009) Wildfire spread experiments: fluctuations in thermal measurements. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 36: 887–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morandini F, Silvani X (2010) Experimental investigation of the physical mechanisms governing the spread of wildfires. Int J Wildland Fire 19: 570–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silvani X (2013) Metrology for fire experiments in outdoor conditions. Springer London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Al-Agha K, Bertin MH, Dang T, Guitton A, Minet P, Val T, Viollet JB (2009) Which wireless technology for industrial wireless sensor networks? The development of OCARI technology. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 56: 4266–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Minor CP, Johnson KJ, Rose-Pehrsson SL, Owrutsky JC, Wales SC, Steinhurst DA, Gottuk DT (2010) A full-scale prototype multisensor system for damage control and situational awareness. Fire Technol 46: 437–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garcia-Sanchez A-J, Garcia-Sanchez F, Garcia-Haro J (2011) Wireless sensor network deployment for integrating video-surveillance and data-monitoring in precision agriculture over distributed crops. Comput Electron Agric 75: 288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ehsan S, Bradford K, Brugger M, Hamdaoui B, Kovchegov Y, Johnson D, Louhaichi M (2012) Design and analysis of delay-tolerant sensor networks for monitoring and tracking free-roaming animals. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 11: 1220–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gutierrez J, Villa-Medina JF, Nieto-Garibay A, Porta-Gandara MA (2013) Automated irrigation system using a wireless sensor network and GPRS module, IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 1–1.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Evans RG, Iversen WM (2008) Remote sensing and control of an irrigation system using a distributed wireless sensor network. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57: 1379–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Christmann D, Martinovic I (2010) Experimental design and analysis of transmission properties in an indoor wireless sensor network. In: Experimental design and analysis of transmission properties in an indoor wireless sensor network. 342–47.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferrigno L, Paciello V, Pietrosanto A (2005) A bluetooth-based proposal of instrument wireless interface. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 54: 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gao RX, Hunerberg P (2002) Design of a CDMA-based wireless data transmitter for embedded sensing. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 51: 1259–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fan Z, Gao RX, Asadizanjani N, Kazmer DO (2013) Acoustic wave-based data transmission for multivariate sensing, IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 1–1.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salvadori F, Campos MD, Sausen PS, Camargo RFD, Gehrke C, Rech C, Spohn MA, Oliveira AC (2009) Monitoring in industrial systems using wireless sensor network with dynamic power management. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58: 3104–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bayo A, Antolín D, Medrano N, Calvo B, Celma S (2010) Early detection and monitoring of forest fire with a wireless sensor network system. Procedia Eng 5: 248–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aslan YE, Korpeoglu I, Ulusoy Ö (2012) A framework for use of wireless sensor networks in forest fire detection and monitoring. Comput Environ Urban Syst 36: 614–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Díaz-Ramírez A, Tafoya LA, Atempa JA, Mejía-Alvarez P (2012) Wireless sensor networks and fusion information methods for forest fire detection. Procedia Technol 3: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Antoine-Santoni T, Santucci J-F, De Gentili E, Silvani X, Morandini F (2009) Performance of a protected wireless sensor network in a fire. Analysis of fire spread and data transmission. Sensors 9: 5878–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fernández-Berni J, Carmona-Galán R, Martínez-Carmona JF, Rodríguez-Vázquez Á (2012) Early forest fire detection by vision-enabled wireless sensor networks. Int J Wildland Fire 21: 938–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Silvani X, Morandini F, Dupuy J-L (2012) Effects of slope on fire spread observed through video images and multiple-point thermal measurements. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 41: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yilmaz N, Gill W, Donaldson AB, Lucero R (2008) Problems encountered in fluctuating flame temperature measurements by thermocouple. Sensors 8: 7882–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Drysdale D (2011) An introduction to fire dynamics, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Memsics (2010) Wireless Modules. In: Wireless Modules.
  32. 32.
    Kempka T, Kaiser T, Solbach K (2006) Microwaves in fire detection. Fire Saf J 41: 327–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    San-Miguel-Ayanz J, RN, Kelha V, A O (2005) Active fire detection for emergency management: potential and limitations for the operational use of remote sensing. Nat Hazards 35: 361.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Joglar F, Mowrer F, Modarres M (2005) A probabilistic model for fire detection with applications. Fire Technol 41: 151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mealy C, Gottuk D (2010) Experimental validation of smoke detector spacing requirements and the impact of these requirements on detector performance. Fire Technol 46: 679–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    XMesh User’s Manual. In: XMesh User’s Manual. 2005–2007, p. 132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Silvani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frédéric Morandini
    • 1
  • Eric Innocenti
    • 1
  • Sylvestre Peres
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory Sciences Pour l’Environnement CNRS UMR 6134University of CorsicaCorteFrance
  2. 2.EDF – Systèmes Energétiques InsulairesAjaccioFrance

Personalised recommendations