Fire Technology

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 291–306

Assessment of Fire Dynamics Simulator for Heat Flux and Flame Heights Predictions from Fires in SBI Tests

  • Jianping Zhang
  • Michael Delichatsios
  • Matthieu Colobert


This paper presents an experimental and numerical study of heat flux and flame heights from fires generated in single burning item (SBI) tests. Thin steel plate probes were developed, as an inexpensive and reliable alternative to heat flux gauges, to measure the surface heat flux, whilst flame heights were determined by analyzing the instantaneous images extracted from the videos of the experiments by a CCD camera. Experimental results obtained at different heat release rates were subsequently used to assess the accuracy of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code, Fire dynamics simulator (FDS, V4.07). Simulation results indicated that though predicting reasonably flame heights FDS underpredicts significantly the surface heat flux at higher heat release rates. Consequently, a sensitivity study of the parameters used in the radiation and soot models in FDS was conducted.


single burning item (SBI) tests steel plate probes surface heat flux flame heights CFD modelling FDS 


  1. 1.
    Hasemi Y, Tokunaga T (1984) Some experimental aspects of turbulent diffusion flames and buoyant plumes from fire sources against a wall out in a corner of walls. Combust Sci Technol 4:15–26Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kokkala MA (1993) Characteristics of a flame in an open corner of walls. In: Proceedings of Interflam, Interscience Communication Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heskestad G (1995) Fire plumes. In: DiNenno PJ (ed) SPFE handbook of fire protection engineering, 2nd edn., National Fire Protection Association, QuincyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng Q (1995) Turbulent flame spread on vertical corner walls. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-95-669Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dillon SE (1998) Analysis of the ISO 9705 room/corner test: simulations, correlations and heat flux measurements. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-98-756Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ohlemiller TJ (2000) Estimating Fire Growth on Composite Materials in a Corner Configuration. In: 45th International SAMPE symposium and exhibition, vol 45. Long Beach, CA, pp. 1229–1243Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lattimer BY, Sorathia U (2003) Thermal characteristics of fires in a non-combustible corner. Fire Saf J 38:709–745. doi: 10.1016/S0379-7112(03)00065-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    BRITISH STANDARD BS EN 13823:(2002) Reaction to fire tests for building products—building products excluding floorings exposed to the thermal attack by a single burning itemGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lennon PF, Silcock GWH (2001) An investigation of the ability of a thin plate heat flux device to determine the incident heat fluxes during enclosure fires. Int J Eng Performance-Based Codes 3:1–15Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tofilo P (2006) Factors controlling the behaviour of glazing systems in enclosures. PhD dissertation, University of UlsterGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Audouin L, Kolb G, Torero JL, Most JM (1995) Average centreline temperatures of a buoyant pool fire obtained by image processing of video recordings Fire Saf J 24:167–187. doi:10.1016/0379-7112(95)00021-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGrattan K, Forney G (2005) Fire dynamics simulator (version 4) user’s guide. NIST Special Publication 1019, National Institute of Standards and Technology, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zukoski EE, Kubota T, Cetegen BM (1981) Air entrainment in fire plumes. Fire Saf J 3:107–121. doi:10.1016/0379-7112(81)90037-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Floyd J, Lattimer BY (2003) Validation of FDS V4 boundary heat flux predictions for a corner fire. In: Proceedings of Interflam, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lautenberger CW, de Ris J, Dembsey NA, Barnett JR, Baum HR (2005) A simplified model for soot formation and oxidation in CFD simulation of non-premixed hydrocarbon flames. Fire Saf J 40:141–176. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2004.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beji T, Zhang J, Delichatsios MA (2008) Determination of soot formation rate from laminar smoke point measurements. Combust Sci Technol 180:927–940. doi:10.1080/00102200801894398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Delichatsios MA (1994) A Phenomenological Model for Smoke-Point and Soot Formation in Laminar Flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 100:283–298. doi:10.1080/00102209408935457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smyth KC (1999) Diffusion flame measurements of species concentrations, soot concentrations, temperature, and velocity. Available online at

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianping Zhang
    • 1
  • Michael Delichatsios
    • 1
  • Matthieu Colobert
    • 1
  1. 1.FireSERT, Research Institute of Built EnvironmentUniversity of Ulster at JordanstownNewtownabbeyUK

Personalised recommendations