Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 111–129 | Cite as

Modelling Credit Risk for Innovative SMEs: the Role of Innovation Measures

  • Chiara Pederzoli
  • Grid Thoma
  • Costanza Torricelli
Article

Abstract

Small-medium enterprises (SMEs) encounter financial constraints when they try to obtain credit from banks. These constraints are particularly severe for innovative SMEs. Thus, developing models for innovative SMEs that provide reliable estimates of their probabilities of default (PD) is important because the PDs can also serve as ratings. We examine the role of innovative assets such as patents in credit risk modelling due to their signaling value. Specifically, we add to a logit model two innovation-related variables in order to account for both the dimension and the value of the patent portfolio. Based on a unique data set of innovative SMEs with default years of 2005–2008, we show that, although the value of the patent portfolio always reduces the PD, its dimension reduces the firm’s riskiness only if coupled with an appropriate equity level.

Keywords

Innovative small-medium enterprises Default probability Patent value R&D productivity 

JEL classification

G21 G32 C25 O34 

References

  1. Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Finance 13:589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman EI, Hotchkiss E (2006) Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt, 3rd edn. Wiley Finance, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman EI, Sabato G (2005) Effects of the New Basel Capital Accord on bank capital requirements for SMEs. J Financ Serv Res 28:15–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altman EI, Sabato G (2007) Modelling credit risk for SMEs: Evidence from the US market. Abacus 43(3):332–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow KJ (1975) Vertical integration and communication. Bell J Econ 6:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), (2006) International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework - comprehensive version, Bank for International SettlementsGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaver V (1966) Financial ratios as predictors of failure. J Acc Res 5:71–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A, Martinez Peria MS (2011) Bank financing for SMEs: Evidence across countries and bank ownership types. J Financ Serv Res 39:35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Behr P, Güttler A (2007) Credit risk assessment and relationship lending: An empirical analysis of German small and medium-sized enterprises. J Small Bus Manag 45:194–213Google Scholar
  11. Berger AN, Cowan AM, Frame WS (2011) The surprising use of credit scoring in small business lending by community banks and the attendant effects on credit availability, risk, and profitability. J Financ Serv Res 39:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown JR, Fazzari SM, Petersen BC (2009) Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity and the 1990s R&D boom. J Finance 64(1):151–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buddelmeyer H, Jensen P, Wesbster E (2010) Innovation and the determinants of company survival. Oxford Econ Papers 62(2):261–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter RE, Petersen BC (2002) Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. Econ J 112:54–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denis D (2004) Entrepreneurial finance: An overview of the issues and evidence. J Corp Finance 10:301–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EIB (2009) R&D and the financing of innovation in Europe. Eur Invest Bank 14:2Google Scholar
  17. Fantazzini D, Figini S (2009) Default forecasting for small-medium enterprises: Does heterogeneity matters? Inter J Risk Assess Manag 11:38–49Google Scholar
  18. Fidrmuc J, Heinz C (2009) Default rates in the loan market for SMEs: Evidence from Slovakia. University of Munich, IFO Working Paper N 72Google Scholar
  19. Gambardella A, Harhoff D, Verspagen B (2008) The value of European patents. Eur Manag Rev 5(2):69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J Econ Lit 28:1661–1707Google Scholar
  21. Grunert J, Norden L, Weber M (2005) The role of non-financial factors in internal credit ratings. J Bank Finance 29(2):509–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guellec D, de la Potterie Van Pottelsberghe B (2000) Applications, grants, and the value of patents. Econ Letters 69(1):109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guellec D, de la Potterie van Pottelsberghe B (2007) The economics of the European patent system: IP policy for innovation and competition. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall BH (2002) The financing of research and development, NBER Working Paper No. 8773Google Scholar
  25. Hall BH (2005) Measuring the returns to R&D: The depreciation problem. Ann Econ Stat 79(80):341–381Google Scholar
  26. Hall BH, Lerner J (2010) Financing R&D and innovation. In: Hall BH, Rosenberg N (eds) The Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 610–638Google Scholar
  27. Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools, NBER Working Paper No. 8498Google Scholar
  28. Hall BH, Thoma G, Torrisi S (2007) The market value of patents and R&D: Evidence from European firms. NBER Working paper No. 13426Google Scholar
  29. Hall BH, Mairesse J, Mohnen P (2010) Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis. In:, Hall BH and Rosenberg N (eds) The Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Elsevier, Amsterdam pp. 1034–1076.Google Scholar
  30. Harhoff D (1996) Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development. Manag Sci 42(6):907–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harhoff D, Körting T (1998) Lending relationships in Germany: Empirical results from survey data. J Bank Finance 22:1317–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harhoff D, Thoma G (2010) Inventor location and the globalization of R&D. Paper presented at the Conference on Patent Statistics on Decision Makers, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  33. Harhoff D, Scherer FM, Vopel K (2003) Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights—Evidence from Germany. Res Policy 32:1343–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harhoff D, Häussler C, Müller E (2009) To be financed or not: The role of patents for VC financing, CEPR Discussion Paper 7115Google Scholar
  35. Hsu D, Ziedonis R (2008) Patents as quality signals for entrepreneurial ventures. Academy of Management Best Paper Procedings, Anaheim CaGoogle Scholar
  36. Kerr WR, Lerner J, Schoar A (2010) The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: A regression discontinuity analysis, NBER Working Paper No. 15831Google Scholar
  37. Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M (2004) Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econ J 114:441–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lennox C (1999) Identifying failing companies: A reevaluation of the Logit, Probit and DA approaches. J Econ Bus 51:347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lerner J (1994) The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. Rand J Econ 25(2):319–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Motohashi K (2011) Innovation and entrepreneurship: A first look at linkage data of Japanese patent and enterprise census, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 11-E-007Google Scholar
  41. OECD (2009a) OECD patent statistics manual. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  42. OECD (2009b) Financing high growth and innovative start-ups and SMEs: Data and measurement issues. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Ohlson J (1980) Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. J Acc Res 18:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pederzoli C, Torricelli C (2010) A parsimonious default prediction model for Italian SMEs. Banks Bank Syst 5:28–32Google Scholar
  45. Sobehart J, Keenan S, Stein R (2001) Benchmarking quantitative default risk models: A validation methodology. Algo Res Q 4:57–72Google Scholar
  46. Stein RM (2007) Benchmarking default prediction models: Pitfalls and remedies in model validation. J Risk Model Validat 1:77–113Google Scholar
  47. Thoma G, Torrisi S, Gambardella A, Guellec D, Hall BH, Harhoff D (2010) Harmonizing and combining large datasets – An application to firm-level patent and accounting data, NBER Working Paper No. 15851Google Scholar
  48. Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J Econ 21:172–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Pederzoli
    • 1
    • 4
  • Grid Thoma
    • 2
    • 4
  • Costanza Torricelli
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and BusinessUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and InformaticsUniversity of CamerinoCamerinoItaly
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  4. 4.CEFINCentro Studi Banca e FinanzaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations