Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 1–31 | Cite as

How Much Do Banks Use Credit Derivatives to Hedge Loans?

  • Bernadette A. Minton
  • René Stulz
  • Rohan Williamson
Article

Abstract

Before the credit crisis that started in mid-2007, it was generally believed by top regulators that credit derivatives make banks sounder. In this paper, we investigate the validity of this view. We examine the use of credit derivatives by US bank holding companies with assets in excess of one billion dollars from 1999 to 2005. Using the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Bank Holding Company Database, we find that in 2005 the gross notional amount of credit derivatives held by banks exceeds the amount of loans on their books. Only 23 large banks out of 395 use credit derivatives and most of their derivatives positions are held for dealer activities rather than for hedging of loans. The net notional amount of credit derivatives used for hedging of loans in 2005 represents less than 2% of the total notional amount of credit derivatives held by banks and less than 2% of their loans. We conclude that the use of credit derivatives by banks to hedge loans is limited because of adverse selection and moral hazard problems and because of the inability of banks to use hedge accounting when hedging with credit derivatives. Our evidence raises important questions about the extent to which the use of credit derivatives makes banks sounder.

Keywords

Credit derivatives Hedge Loans Banks 

References

  1. Acharya VV, Johnson TC (2007) Insider trading in credit derivatives. J Financ Econ 84:110–141 doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashraf D, Altunbas Y, Goddard J (2006) Determinants of the use of credit derivatives by large US banks, unpublished working paper, University of Wales, Bangor, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2007) Semiannual OTC derivatives statistics (May)Google Scholar
  4. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2002) Line item instruction for consolidated financial statements for bank holding companies—FR Y-9CGoogle Scholar
  5. Cebenoyan AS, Strahan PE (2004) Risk management, capital structure and lending at banks. J Bank Finance 28:19–43 doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00391-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahiya S, Puri M, Saunders A (2003) Bank borrowers and loan sales: new evidence on the uniqueness of bank loans. J Bus 76:563–582 doi:10.1086/377031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diamond D (1984) Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Rev Econ Stud 51:393–414 doi:10.2307/2297430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diamond DW, Rajan RG (2000) A theory of bank capital. J Finance 55:2431–2465 doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duffee G, Zhou C (2001) Credit derivatives in banking: useful tools for managing risk. J Monet Econ 48:25–54 doi:10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00063-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fama EF (1985) What’s different about banks. J Monet Econ 15:29–40 doi:10.1016/0304-3932(85)90051-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FitchRatings (2006) Global credit derivatives survey: indices dominate growth as banks’ risk position shift. Available at http://www.securitization.net/pdf/Fitch/Derivatives_21Sept06.pdf.
  12. Franke G, Krahnen J (2006) Default risk sharing between banks and markets: the contribution of collateralized debt obligations. In: Carey M, Stulz R (eds) The risks of financial institutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 603–631Google Scholar
  13. Géczy C, Minton B, Schrand C (1997) Why firms use currency derivatives. J Finance 52:1323–1354 doi:10.2307/2329438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorton G, Pennacchi G (1995) Bank loan sales: marketing nonmarketable assets. J Monet Econ 35:389–411 doi:10.1016/0304-3932(95)01199-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorton G, Souleles N (2006) Special purpose vehicles and securitization. In: Carey M, Stulz R (eds) The risks of financial institutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 549–597Google Scholar
  16. Greenspan A (2004) Economic flexibility, speech to HM Treasury Enterprise Conference, London, U.K.Google Scholar
  17. Graham J, Rogers D (2002) Do firms hedge in response to tax incentives. J Finance 57:815–839 doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. James C (1988) The use of loan sales and standby letters of credit by commercial banks. J Monet Econ 22:399–422 doi:10.1016/0304-3932(88)90005-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kiff J, Michaud F-L, Mitchell J (2002) Instruments of credit risk transfer: effects on financial contracting and financial stability. Working Paper. Bank of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  20. Lins KV, Servaes H, Tamayo A (2007) Does derivative accounting affect risk management? International survey evidence. Working paper. London Business School, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Mahieu R, Xu Y (2007) Hedging with interest rate and credit derivatives by banks. Working paper. RSM Erasmus University, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Marsh IW (2006) The effect of lenders’ credit risk transfer activities on borrowing firms’ equity returns. Working paper. Bank of Finland, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  23. Mian SL (1996) Evidence on corporate hedging policy. J Financ Quant Anal 31:419–439 doi:10.2307/2331399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrison AD (2005) Credit derivatives, disintermediation, and investment decisions. J Bus 78:621–647 doi:10.1086/427641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nance DR, Smith CW Jr, Smithson CW (1993) On the determinants of corporate hedging. J Finance 48:267–284 doi:10.2307/2328889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Partnoy F, Skeel D (2006) Credit derivatives play a dangerous game, Financial Times, Sunday, July 16.Google Scholar
  27. Purnanandam A (2004) Do banks hedge in response to financial distress costs? Working paper, Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  28. Schrand C, Unal H (1998) Hedging and coordinated risk management: Evidence from thrift conversions. J Finance 53:979–1013 doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith C, Stulz R (1985) The determinants of firms’ Hedging policies. J Financ Quant Anal 28:391–405 doi:10.2307/2330757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stulz R (2003) Risk management and derivatives. South-Western, Mason, OHGoogle Scholar
  31. Yarish A (2003) Mark-to-market accounting undercuts banks’ loan hedging. RMA JournalGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernadette A. Minton
    • 1
  • René Stulz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rohan Williamson
    • 3
  1. 1.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.NBERCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Georgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations