Advertisement

Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 351–363 | Cite as

International Law, Social Change and Resistance: A Conversation Between Professor Anna Grear (Cardiff) and Professorial Fellow Dianne Otto (Melbourne)

  • Dianne OttoEmail author
  • Anna Grear
Interview

Abstract

This conversation between two scholars of international law focuses on the contemporary realities of feminist analysis of international law and on current and future spaces of resistance. It notes that feminism has moved from the margin towards the centre, but that this has also come at a cost. As the language of women’s rights and gender equality has travelled into the international policy worlds of crisis management and peace and security, feminist scholars need to become more careful in their analysis and find new ways of resistance. While noting that we live in dangerous times, this is also a hopeful discussion.

Keywords

Feminist critique International law Resistance Co-option Postcolonial Anthroprocene 

References

  1. Agathangellou, Anna M. 2004. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly 48: 530–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anghie, Anthony. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollier, David, and Silke Helfrich. 2015. Patterns of Commoning. Amherst, MA: Commons Strategies Group.Google Scholar
  4. Bookchin, Murray. 2005. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Chico, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, Wendy. 2010. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Caffentzis, George. 2010. The Future of the ‘Commons’: Neoliberalism’s ‘Plan B’ or the Original Disaccumulation of Capital? New Formations 69: 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chivers, Danny, and Jess Worth. 2015. Paris Deal: Epic Fail on a Planetary Scale. New Internationalist, 12 December.Google Scholar
  9. Code, Lorraine. 2006. Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corson, Catherine, and Kenneth I. McDonald. 2012. Enclosing the Global Commons: The Convention on Biological Diversity and Green Grabbing. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(2): 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crutzen, Paul J. 2002. Geology of Mankind. Nature 415(6867): 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dekha, Maneesha. 2008. Intersectionality and Post-humanist Visions of Equality. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender and Society 23: 249–267.Google Scholar
  14. Engle, Pamela. 2015. Donald Trump: I Would ‘Bomb the s___ out of” ISIS. Business Insider Australia, 14 November.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, Nancy. 2009. Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History. New Left Review 56: 97–110.Google Scholar
  16. Gill, Stephen. 2002. Constitutionalizing Inequality and the Clash of Globalizations. International Studies Review 4: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gonzalez, Carmen. 2015. Bridging the North-South Divide: International Environmental Law in the Anthropocene. Pace Environmental Law Review 32: 407–433.Google Scholar
  18. Grear, Anna. 2010. Redirecting Human Rights: Facing the Challenge of Corporate Legal Humanity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grear, Anna. 2011. ‘Mind the Gap’: One Dilemma Concerning the Expansion of Legal Subjectivity in the Age of Globalisation. Law, Crime and History 1(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
  20. Grear, Anna. 2014. Towards ‘Climate Justice’? A Critical Reflection on Legal Subjectivity and Climate Injustice: Warning Signals, Patterned Hierarchies, Directions for Future Law and Policy. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, Special Edition 5: 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grear, Anna. 2015. Deconstructing Anthropos: A Critical Legal Reflection on ‘Anthropocentric’ Law and Anthropocene ‘Humanity’. Law and Critique 26(3): 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grear, Anna. 2017. Ecological Publics: Imagining Epistemic Openness. Global-E 10/44. http://www.21global.ucsb.edu/global-e/june-2017/ecological-publics-imagining-epistemic-openness. Accessed 20th October 2018.
  23. Halley, Janet, Prabha Kotiswaran, Hila Shamir, and Chantal Thomas. 2006. From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape, Prostitution/Sex Work, and Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 29: 335–424.Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haraway, Donna. 2014. Anthropocene, Capitolocene, Chthulucene: Staying with the Trouble, Lecture Given at the University of California, Santa Cruz on 5th September. https://vimeo.com/97663518. Accessed 20 October 2018.
  26. Hussain, Nasser. 2003. The Jurisprudence of Emergency: The Rule of Law Under Colonialism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kouvo, Sari and Zoe Pearson (eds.). 2001. Feminist Perspectives on Contemporary International Law: Between Resistance and Compliance?. Oxford: Onati.Google Scholar
  28. Luke, Timothy W. 1995. On Environmentality: Geo-Power and Eco-Knowledge in the Discourses of Contemporary Environmentalism. Cultural Critique 31: 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mbembe, Achille. 2001. On the Postcolony. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Merchant, Carolyn. 1990. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  31. Mieville, China. 2007. Un Lun Dun. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Nibert, David. 2002. Animal Rights, Human Rights: Entanglements of Oppression and Liberation. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  33. Otto, Dianne. 2009. The Exile of Inclusion: Reflections on Gender Issues in International Law over the Last Decade. Melbourne Journal of International Law 10: 11–26.Google Scholar
  34. Otto, Dianne. 2013. International Human Rights Law: Towards Rethinking Sex/Gender Dualism. In A Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory, ed. Margaret Davies and Vanessa Munro, 197–215. London: Ashgate Companion Series.Google Scholar
  35. Otto, Dianne. 2015. Decoding Crisis: A Queer Feminist Perspective on the Productivity of Crisis for International Law and its Resistive Possibilities. In International Law and Its Discontents: Confronting Crisis, ed. Barbara Stark, 115–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Otto, Dianne. forthcoming. Contesting Feminism’s Institutional Doubles: Troubling the Security Council’s Women Peace and Security Agenda. In Governance Feminism: Notes from the Field, ed. Janet Halley, Prabha Kotiswaran, Rachel Rebouché, and Hila Shamir. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Otto, Dianne (ed.). 2018a. Queering International Law: Possibilities, Alliances, Complicities, Risks. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Otto, Dianne. 2018b. Resisting the Heteronormative Imaginary of the Nation State: Rethinking Kinship and Border Protection. In Queering International Law: Possibilities, Alliances, Complicities, Risks, ed. Dianne Otto, 236–257. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2012. The Triveneto Transhumance: Law, Land, Movement. Politica and Societa 3: 447–468.Google Scholar
  40. Pieraccini, Margherita. 2012. Property Pluralism and the Partial Reflexivity of Conservation Law: The Case of Upland Commons in England and Wales. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 3: 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rubin, Gayle. 1984. Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, ed. Carole S. Vance, 267–319. New York: Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar
  42. Time. 2017. Full Text: President Trump Ranted for 77 Minutes in Phoenix. Here’s What He Said. Time, 23 August.Google Scholar
  43. Washington Post. 2016. Full Text: Donald Trump Announces a Presidential Bid. Washington Post, 16 June.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations