Advertisement

Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 71–97 | Cite as

The Transitional Justice Gap: Exploring ‘Everyday’ Gendered Harms and Customary Justice in South Kivu, DR Congo

  • Holly DunnEmail author
Article

Abstract

Feminist transitional justice (TJ) has greatly contributed to the study of justice in the ruins of war, notably around prosecuting wartime rape. At the same time, scholars have observed limitations to this research agenda such as externally-driven definitions gendered harms and how to address them. This paper explores two novel areas for feminist TJ research: ‘everyday gendered harms’ and customary justice. Based on a three month field study of baraza, a customary justice mechanism in parts of South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, I explore three cases of ‘everyday’ harms against women: domestic violence, polygynous relationships and witchcraft. Through a substantive examination of these baraza cases, I highlight how studying the contextualised functioning of customary justice mechanisms provides new insights into different areas of feminist TJ scholarship, including women’s participation in the transition, justice for harms against women, and advancing gender equality. Additionally, this paper adds to the broader TJ literature by engaging with local TJ needs as they pertain to people’s everyday life in transition.

Keywords

Baraza Customary justice Democratic Republic of Congo Gender-based violence Rule of law Transitional justice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Doris Buss, Gabrielle Ferrales, Ore Koren, Lisa Hilbink, Milli Lake, Bridget Marchesi, Oanh Nguyen, Augustine Park, and Blair Rutherford, as well as the anonymous reviewers and editors, for their feedback and comments on earlier iterations of this manuscript. Any remaining weaknesses are, of course, the author’s own.

References

  1. Allen, Tim. 2008. Ritual (Ab) use? Problems with traditional justice in northern Uganda. In Courting conflict?: Justice, peace and the ICC in Africa, ed. Nicholas Waddell, and Phil Clark, 47–54. London: Royal African Society.Google Scholar
  2. Anyeko, Ketty, Erin Baines, Emon Komakech, Boniface Ojok, Lino Owor Ogora, and Letha Victor. 2012. ‘The Cooling of Hearts’: Community truth-telling in Northern Uganda. Human Rights Review 13(1): 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apter, Andrew. 2012. Matrilineal motives: Kinship, witchcraft, and repatriation among Congolese refugees. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18: 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Autesserre, Séverine. 2010. The Trouble with the Congo: Local violence and the failure of international Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Autesserre, Severine. 2012. Dangerous tales: Dominant narratives on the Congo and their unintended consequences. African Affairs 111: 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baaz, Maria Eriksson, and Maria Stern. 2010. The complexity of violence: A critical analysis of sexual violence in the democratic republic of Congo (DRC). Sida working paper on gender based violence. The Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Baaz, Maria Eriksson, and Maria Stern. 2013. Sexual violence as a weapon of war?: Perceptions, prescriptions, problems in the Congo and beyond. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. Babo-Soares, Dionisio. 2004. Nahe Biti: The philosophy and process of grassroots reconciliation (and justice) in East Timor. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 5(1): 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baines, Erin. 2007. The haunting of Alice: Local approaches to justice and reconciliation in Northern Uganda. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1(1): 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baines, Erin. 2010. Spirits and social reconstruction after mass violence: Rethinking transitional justice. African Affairs 109(436): 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Betts, Alexander. 2005. Should approaches to post-conflict justice and reconciliation be determined globally, nationally or locally? The European Journal of Development Research 17: 735–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bond, Johanna. 2007. Constitutional exclusion and gender in commonwealth Africa. Fordham International Law Journal 31: 289–342.Google Scholar
  13. Bond, Johanna E. 2011. Culture, dissent, and the state: The example of Commonwealth African marriage law. Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal 14: 1.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, Wendy. 2004. “The Most We Can Hope For…”: Human rights and the politics of fatalism. The South Atlantic Quarterly 103(2): 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, Doris. 2009. Rethinking ‘rape as a weapon of war’. Feminist Legal Studies 17: 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buss, Doris. 2011. Performing legal order: Some feminist thoughts on International Criminal Law. International Criminal Law Review 11: 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buss, Doris. 2014. Knowing women: Translating patriarchy in International Criminal Law. Social & Legal Studies 23(1): 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Campbell, Kristin. 2007. The gender of transitional justice: Law, sexual violence and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. International Journal of Transitional Justice 3: 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chakravarty, Anuradha. 2005. Gacaca courts in Rwanda: Explaining divisions within the human rights community. Yale Journal of International Affairs 1: 132.Google Scholar
  20. Charmaz, Kathy. 2000. Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory. Handbook of Qualitative Research 2: 509–535.Google Scholar
  21. Charlesworth, Hilary, Christine Chinkin, and Shelley Wright. 1991. Feminist approaches to International Law. American Journal of International Law 85: 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chinkin, Christine, and Hilary Charlesworth. 2006. Building women into peace: The international legal framework. Third World Quarterly 27(5): 937–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chopra, Tanja, and Deborah Isser. 2012. Access to justice and legal pluralism in fragile states: The case of women’s rights. Hague Journal of the Rule of Law 4: 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clark, Phil. 2008. Ethnicity, leadership and conflict mediation in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: The case of the Barza Inter-Communautaire. Journal of Eastern African Studies 2(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clarke, Ross. 2011. Customary legal empowerment: Towards a more critical approach. In Customary justice: Perspectives on legal empowerment, ed. Janine Ubink, and Thomas McInerney, 43–66. Rome: International Development Law Organization.Google Scholar
  26. Cockburn, Cynthia. 2004. The continuum of violence: A gender perspective on war and peace. In Sites of violence: Gender and conflict zones, ed. Wenona Giles, and Jennifer Hyndman, 24–44. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Deramaix, Lara. 2014. Mobile courts’ missing ingredient: An SSR perspective? http://issat.dcaf.ch/Share/Blogs/ISSAT-Blog/Mobile-Courts-Missing-Ingredient-An-SSR-Perspective. Accessed 08 Aug 2016.
  28. Freedman, Jane. 2015. Gender, violence and politics in the democratic republic of Congo. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Grayson, Amanda Claire. 2012. Delivering justice for sexual violence in the DR Congo and beyond: Cooperation, education, and capacity-building through national and international courts. Journal of Global Citizenship & Equity Education 2: 123–141.Google Scholar
  30. Grina, Eve M. 2011. Mainstreaming gender in rule of law initiatives in post-conflict settings. William and Mary Journal of Women and Law 17(2): 435–473.Google Scholar
  31. Harper, Erica. 2011. Engaging with customary justice systems. In Promoting the rule of law abroad: In search of knowledge, ed. Janine Ubink, and Thomas McInerney, 29–42. Rome: International Development Law Organization.Google Scholar
  32. Hellum, Anne. 2013. Gender, human rights and legal pluralities: Experiences from Southern and Eastern Africa. In Gender justice and legal pluralities: Latin American and African perspectives, ed. Rachel Sieder, and John-Andrew McNeish, 31–55. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Henry, N. 2010. The impossibility of bearing witness: Wartime rape and the promise of justice. Violence Against Women 16: 1098–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henry, Nicola. 2014. The fixation on wartime rape: Feminist critique and International Criminal Law. Social & Legal Studies 23: 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. Introduction: Inventing traditions. In The invention of tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm, and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hodgson, Dorothy. 2011. Introduction: Gender and culture at the limit of rights. In Gender and culture at the limit of rights, ed. Dorothy Hodgson, 1–16. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hoffman, Elisabeth. 2008. Reconciliation in Sierra Leone: Local processes yield global lessons. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 32: 129–141.Google Scholar
  38. Hopwood, Julian. 2015. Women’s land claims in the Acholi region of Northern Uganda: What can be learned from what is contested. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22(3): 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huyse, Luc. 2008. Introduction: Tradition-based approaches in peacemaking, transitional justice and reconciliation policies. In Traditional justice and reconciliation after violent conflict: Learning from African experiences, ed. Luc Huyse, and Mark Salter, 1–23. International Idea: Stockholm.Google Scholar
  40. Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. 2012. Democratic republic of the Congo: Domestic and sexual violence, including legislation, state protection, and services available to victims (2006-March 2012), COD104022.E. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4f9e5e532.html. Accessed 28 Oct 2016.
  41. Ingelaere, Bert. 2012. From model to practice: Researching and representing Rwanda’s ‘modernized’ gacaca courts. Critique of Anthropology 32(4): 388–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Isser, Deborah. 2011. Introduction: Shifting assumptions from abstract ideals to messy realities. In Customary justice and the rule of law in War-Torn societies, ed. Deborah Isser, 1–12. Washington: US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  43. Joireman, Sandra F. 2008. The mystery of capital formation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Women, property rights and customary law. World Development 36(7): 1233–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2003. The ontology of “political violence”: Action and identity in civil wars. Perspectives on Politics 1(3): 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kapur, Rarna. 2002. The tragedy of victimization rhetoric: Ressurecting the “Native” subject in international/post-colonial feminist legal politics. Harvard Human Rights Journal 15: 1–37.Google Scholar
  46. Kapur, Amrita. 2011. Catch-22: The role of development institutions in promoting gender equality in land law-Lessons learned in post-conflict pluralist Africa. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 17: 75.Google Scholar
  47. Kelsall, Michelle Staggs, and Shanee Stepakoff. 2007. ‘When we wanted to talk about rape’: Silencing sexual violence at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kennedy, David. 2002. International human rights movement: Part of the problem? Harvard Human Rights Journal 15: 101.Google Scholar
  49. Koomen, Jonneke. 2013. “Without These Women, the Tribunal Cannot Do Anything”: The politics of witness testimony on sexual violence at the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda. Signs 38(2): 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lake, Milli. 2014. Organizing hypocrisy: Providing legal accountability for human rights violations in areas of limited statehood. International Studies Quarterly 58: 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lankhorst, Marco, and Muriel Veldman. 2011. Engaging with customary law to create scope for realizing women’s formally protected land rights in Rwanada. In Working with customary justice: Post-conflict and fragile states, ed. Erica Harper, 93–108. Rome: International Development Law Organization.Google Scholar
  52. Lincoln, Ryan S. 2011. Rule of law for whom: Strengthening the rule of law as a solution to sexual violence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice 26: 139–167.Google Scholar
  53. Lundy, Patricia, and Mark McGovern. 2008. Whose justice? Rethinking transitional justice from the bottom up. Journal of Law and Society 35(2): 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2010. Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue 41(4): 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Manjoo, Rashida, and Calleigh McRaith. 2011. Gender-based violence and justice in conflict and post-conflict areas. Cornell International Law Journal 44: 11–31.Google Scholar
  56. McAuliffe, Padraig. 2010. Transitional justice and the rule of law: The perfect couple or Awkward bedfellows? Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 2(2): 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McAuliffe, Padraig. 2013. Romanticization versus integration: Indigenous justice in rule of law reconstruction and transitional justice discourse. Goettingen Journal of International Law 5: 41–86.Google Scholar
  58. McEvoy, Kieran. 2007. Beyond legalism: Towards a thicker understanding of transitional justice. Journal of Law and Society 34(4): 411–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McNeilly, Kathryn. 2014. Gendered violence and international human rights: Thinking non-discrimination beyond the sex binary. Feminist Legal Studies 22(3): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  61. Merry, Sally Engle. 1988. Legal pluralism. Law and Society Review 22: 869–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mertus, Julie. 2004. Shouting from the bottom of the well: The impact of international trials for wartime rape on women’s agency. International Feminist Journal of Politics 6(1): 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miller, Zinaida. 2008. Effects of invisibility: In search of the ‘economic’ in transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2(3): 266–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mills, Jane, Ann Bonner, and Karen Francis. 2008. The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Molenaar, Arthur. 2005. Gacaca, grassroots justice after genocide: The key to reconciliation in Rwanda?. Leiden: African Studies Centre.Google Scholar
  66. Mutua, Makau. 2001. Savages, victims, and saviors: The metaphor of human rights. Harvard International Law Journal 42: 201–245.Google Scholar
  67. Nagy, Rosemary. 2008. Transitional justice as global project: Critical reflections. Third World Quarterly 29: 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Narayan, Uma. 1998. Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism. Hypatia 13(2): 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ndulo, Muna. 2011. African customary law, customs, and women’s rights. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18: 87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ni Aoláin, Fionnuala. 2009. Exploring a feminist theory of harm in the context of conflicted and post-conflict societies. Queen’s Law Journal 35: 219.Google Scholar
  71. Ni Aoláin, Fionnuala. 2012. Advancing feminist positioning in the field of transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 013: 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ni Aoláin, Fionnuala, and Michael Hamilton. 2009. Gender and the rule of law in transitional societies. Minnesota Journal of International Law 18: 380.Google Scholar
  73. Ni Aoláin, Francesca, Dina Fionnuala Haynes, and Naomi Cahn. 2011. On the frontlines: Gender, war, and the post-conflict process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nikolic-Ristanovic, Vesna. 2005. Sexual violence, international law and restorative justice. International Law.Google Scholar
  75. Nyamu, Celestine I. 2000. How should human rights and development respond to cultural legitimization of gender hierarchy in developing countries? Harvard International Law Journal 41(2): 381–418.Google Scholar
  76. Oba, Abdulmumini. 2011. The future of customary law in Africa. In The future of African customary law, ed. Jeanmarie Fenrich, Paolo Galizzi, and Tracey E. Higgins, 58–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Obiora, Amede. 1993. Reconsidering African customary law. Legal Studies Forum 17: 217–252.Google Scholar
  78. Oomen, Barbara. 2005. Donor-driven justice and its discontents: The case of Rwanda. Development and Change 36(5): 887–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. O’Rourke, Catherine. 2015. Feminist scholarship in transitional justice: A de-politicising impulse? Women’s Studies International Forum 51: 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Park, Augustine. 2010. Community-based restorative transitional justice in Sierra Leone. Contemporary Justice Review 13(1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Porter, Elisabeth. 2016. Gendered narratives: Stories and silences in transitional justice. Human Rights Review 17: 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pratt, Nicola. 2013. Reconceptualizing gender, reinscribing racial-sexual boundaries in international security: The case of UN security council resolution 1325 on “Women, Peace and Security” 1. International Studies Quarterly 57(4): 772–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Prinsloo, M.W. 1993. Recognition and application of indigenous law in Zaire, Rwanda, Burundi and Lusophone Africa. Journal of South African Law 4: 541–551.Google Scholar
  84. Reilly, Niamh. 2007. Seeking gender justice in post-conflict transitions: Towards a transformative women’s human rights approach. International Journal of Law in Context 3(2): 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Reilly, Niamh. 2009. Women’s human rights. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  86. Scanlon, Helen, and Nompulelemo Motlafi. 2010. Indigenous justice or political instrument? The modern Gacaca courts of Rwanda. In Peace versus justice? The dilemmas of transitional justice in Africa, ed. Chandra Lekha Sriram, and Suren Pillay, 301–314. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  87. Schatzberg, Michael. 2000. La sorcellerie comme mode de causalité politique. Politique Africaine 79: 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sharp, Dustin N. 2012. Addressing economic violence in times of transition: Toward a positive-peace paradigm for transitional justice. Fordham International Law Journal 35: 780–814.Google Scholar
  89. Sharp, Dustin N. 2014. Emancipating transitional justice from the bonds of the paradigmatic transition. International Journal of Transitional Justice 9(10): 150–169.Google Scholar
  90. Shepherd, Laura J. 2011. Sex, security and superhero(in)es: From 1325 to 1820 and beyond. International Feminist Journal of Politics 13(4): 504–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Shaw, Rosalind, and Lars Waldorf. 2010. Introduction: Localizing transitional justice. In Localizing transitional justice: Interventions and priorities after mass violence, ed. Rosalind Shaw, and Lars Waldorf, 3–26. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Spear, Thomas. 2003. Neo-traditionalism and the limits of invention in British Colonial Africa. The Journal of African History 44: 3–27.Google Scholar
  93. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. Cary Nelson, and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Macmillan Education: UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Teitel, Ruti G. 2001. Humanity’s law: Rule of law for the new global politics. Cornell International Law Journal 35: 355–387.Google Scholar
  95. Teitel, Ruti G. 2003. Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 69.Google Scholar
  96. Tshibanda-Baudoin, Wikha. 2009. The congolese constitution does not recognize witchcraft. In African law study library with specific emphasis on the democratic republic of Congo, ed. Hartmut Hamann, and Kalala Illunga Matthiesen, 170–183. Nairobi: Rule of Law Program for Sub-Saharan Africa.Google Scholar
  97. Thomson, Susan. 2013. Whispering truth to power: Everyday resistance to reconciliation in postgenocide Rwanda. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  98. Thomson, Susan, and Rosemary Nagy. 2011. Law, power and justice: What legalism fails to address in the functioning of Rwanda’s gacaca courts. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 5(1): 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ubink, Janine. 2011. Gender equality on the Horizon: The case of Uukwambi traditional authority in Namibia. In Working with customary justice: Post-conflict and fragile states, ed. Erica Harper, 51–72. Rome: International Development Law Organization.Google Scholar
  100. Ubink, Janine, and Benjamin van Rooij. 2011. Towards customary legal empowerment: An introduction. In Customary justice: Perspectives on legal empowerment, ed. Janine Ubink, and Thomas McInerney, 7–28. Rome: International Development Law Organization.Google Scholar
  101. Uvin, Peter, and Charles Mironko. 2003. Western and local approaches to justice in Rwanda. Global Governance 9: 219–231.Google Scholar
  102. Vandeginste, Stefan. 2004. Justice for Rwanda, 45–60. Ten Years After: Some Lessons Learned for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
  103. Verweijen, Judith. 2015. The disconcerting popularity of popular in/justice in the Fizi/Uvira region, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22: 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Waldorf, Lars. 2010. “Like Jews waiting for Jesus:” Posthumous justice in post-conflict Rwanda. In Localizing transitional justice: Interventions and priorities after mass violence, ed. Rosalind Shaw, and Lars Waldorf, 183–203. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Zongwe, Dunia P. 2013. Taking leaves out of the international criminal court statute: The direct application of international criminal law by military courts in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Israel Law Review 46(02): 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations