Advertisement

Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 311–317 | Cite as

José Medina: The Epistemology of Resistance

Oxford University Press, 368 pp, £22.99, 2013, ISBN: 978-0199929047
  • Jeremy C. Bradley
Book Review
  • 438 Downloads

If truth seeking and the quest for knowledge are at the heart of the legal process, then inequality is the enemy of law. In oppressive situations, epistemic relationships go askew, and the inequality created by, through, or from this oppression handicaps the capacity to know. As José Medina puts it in his book The Epistemology of Resistance, ‘social injustices breed epistemic injustices’; they are two sides of the same coin (27). Oppressive dogma, such as sexism, racism, and homophobia, instil in epistemic actors a cognitive distrust thereby forcing minorities to try to ‘legitimate’ their way of thinking (Austin 1989, 540). Put another way, oppressive ideologies lead people to under- or over-estimate the cognitive capacities of not only others, but of themselves. A failure to recognise such capacities can moreover serve as a foundation for biases and prejudices that distort perception, judgment, and reasoning.

In this review of Medina’s book, I will discuss how epistemic injustices...

References

  1. Austin, Regina. 1989. Sapphire bound! Wisconsin Law Review 539.Google Scholar
  2. Bernal, D.D. 2002. Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical race-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry 8: 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. 2012. Critical race theory: An introduction, 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Du Bois, W.E.B. 1903/1999. The souls of black folk. http://www.bartleby.com/114/1.html.
  5. Fanon, Frantz. 1967. White masks. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gert, Bernard. 2005. Moral arrogance and moral theories. Philosophical Issues 15(1): 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grant, Claire. 2011. Sobering truths: On law and oppression. The Oxford Jurisprudence Discussion Group. http://users.ox.ac.uk/~univ2788/JDGpapers/HT11_1_Grant.pdf.
  8. King, Deborah K. 1998. Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs 14(1): 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ladson-Billings, Gloria J. 1999. Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? In Race is … race isn’t: Critical race theory and qualitative studies in education, ed. L. Parker, D. Deyhele, and S. Villenas. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lawrence, Charles R. 1992. The word and the river: Pedagogy as scholarship as struggle. Southern California Law Review 65: 2231.Google Scholar
  11. Liebich, Andre. 2008. Minority as inferiority: Minority rights in a historical perspective. Review of International Studies 34: 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mills, Charles. 1998. Blackness visible: Essays on philosophy and race. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Shakur, Sanyika. 2013. The pathology of patriarchy: A search for clues at the scene of the crime. Prison Focus 39: 1.Google Scholar
  14. Sholock, Adale. 2012. Methodology of the privileged: White anti-racist feminism, systematic ignorance, and epistemic uncertainty. Hypatia 27(4): 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith, Adam. 1759/1976. The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sztompka, Piotr. 2000. Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2007. The black swan. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Wing, Adrien K. 1991. Brief reflections toward a multiplicative theory and praxis of being. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal 6: 182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London School of Business and FinanceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations