Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 227–244 | Cite as

Vulnerable Bodies, Vulnerable Borders: Extraterritoriality and Human Trafficking

  • Sharron A. FitzGerald


In this article, I interrogate how the UK government constructs and manipulates the idiom of the vulnerable female, trafficked migrant. Specifically, I analyse how the government aligns aspects of its anti-trafficking plans with plans to enhance extraterritorial immigration and border control. In order to do this, I focus on the discursive strategies that revolve around the UK’s anti-trafficking initiatives. I argue that discourses of human trafficking as prostitution, modern-day slavery and organised crime do important work. Primarily, they provide the government with a moral platform from which it can develop its regulatory capacity overseas. It is not my intention to suggest that the government’s anti-trafficking plans are superficial, and that extraterritoriality is the sole driver. On the contrary, I argue that complex interrelationships exist and while the government’s interest in protecting vulnerable women from sexual exploitation may seem to be paramount, I assert that in fact it intersects with other agendas at key points. I consider how government action to protect vulnerable women in trafficking ‘source’ and ‘transit’ countries such as development aid and repatriation schemes relate to broader legal and political concerns about protecting the UK from unwanted ‘Others’.


Women Vulnerability Trafficking Borders Extraterritoriality 



With the usual caveats, I wish to thank Vanessa E. Munro for her help with earlier drafts of this article. I wish to extend my thanks to my two anonymous reviewers whose insightful comments strengthened this piece. Finally, I wish to thank the Editorial Board of Feminist Legal Studies for their editorial assistance.


  1. Andrijasevic, Rutvica, and William Walters. 2010. The international organisation for migration and the international government of borders. Environment and Planning D 28: 977–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aradau, Claudia. 2004. Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 388–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askola, Heli. 2007. Legal responses to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation in the European union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beasley, Christine, and Carol Baachi. 2007. Envisaging a new politics for an ethical future. Feminist Theory 8: 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, Ulrich. 2002. The ecological politics of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
  6. Blunt, Alison. 2007. Cultural geographies of migration: Mobility, transnationality and diaspora. Progress in Human Geography 31: 684–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious life, the powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. 1957. Report of the committee on homosexual offences and prostitution. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  9. Cresswell, Tim. 2006. The right to mobility, the production of mobility in the courtroom. Antipode 38: 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, Julia O’Connell. 2002. The rights and wrongs of prostitution. Hypatia 17: 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Haas, Hein. 2008. The myth of invasion: The inconvenient realities of African migration to Europe. Third World Quarterly 7: 1305–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doezema, Jo. 2000. Loose women or lost women? The re-emergence of the myth of ‘white slavery’ in contemporary discourses of ‘trafficking in women. Gender Issues 18: 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doezema, Jo. 2005. Now you see her, now you don’t: Sex workers at the UN trafficking protocol negotiation. Social Legal Studies 14: 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fineman, Martha. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20: 8–40.Google Scholar
  15. FitzGerald, Sharron. 2008. Putting trafficking on the map: The geography of female complicity. In Demanding sex: Critical reflections on the regulation of prostitution, ed. Vanessa Munro, and Marina Della Giusta, 99–125. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. FitzGerald, Sharron. 2010. Biopolitics and the regulation of vulnerability: The case of the female trafficked migrant. International Journal of Law in Context 6: 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, Michel. 2009. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Geddes, Andrew. 2005. Europe’s border relationships and international migration relations. Journal of Common Market Studies 43: 787–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giddens, Anthony. 1999. Runaway world, how globalisation is reshaping our lives. London: Profile.Google Scholar
  20. Goodey, Jo. 2004. Sex trafficking in women from Central and Eastern European countries. Feminist Review 76: 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guiraudon, Virginie. 2000. European courts and foreigner’s rights: A comparative study of norms diffusion. International Migration Review 34: 1089–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Held, David, and Anthony McGrew. 2002. Governing globalisation. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hewitt, Kenneth. 1997. Regions of risk. Edinburgh: Longman.Google Scholar
  24. Home Office. 2002. Secure borders, safe haven: Integration with diversity in modern Britain. London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  25. Home Office. 2006. A coordinate prostitution strategy. London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  26. Home Office. 2007a. UK action plan on tackling human trafficking. London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  27. Home Office. 2007b. Securing the UK border: Our vision and strategy for securing the future. London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  28. Home Office. 2008. Update to the action plan on tackling human trafficking. London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  29. Home Office. 2009a. Update to the action plan on tackling human trafficking. London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  30. Home Office. 2009b. Policing and crime act. London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  31. Hughes, Donna. 2000. The “Natasha” trade: The transnational shadow market of trafficking in woman. Journal of International Migration 53: 625–651.Google Scholar
  32. Irwin, M. 1996. White slavery’ as metaphor: Anatomy of moral panic. Ex Post Facto: The History Journal 5. Last access 29 Aug 2012.
  33. Kanatola, Joanna, and Judith Squires. 2004. Discourses surrounding prostitution policies in the UK. European Journal of Women’s Studies 11: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kapur, Ratna. 2005. Erotic justice. London: Glasshouse Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kirby, Peadar. 2007. Vulnerability and violence. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  36. Manzo, Kate. 2010. Imagining vulnerability: The iconography of climate change. Area 42: 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, Alice. 2004. Sexuality, violence against women, and human rights: Women make demands and ladies get protection. Health and Human Rights 17: 16–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Munro, Vanessa. 2005. A tale of two servitudes: A domestic response to trafficking of women for prostitution in the UK and Australia. Social and Legal Studies 14: 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peers, Steve. 2004. Key legislative developments on migration in the European Union. European Journal of Migration and Law 6: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sammers, Michael. 2004. An emerging geopolitics of “illegal” immigration in the European Union. European Journal of Migration and Law 6: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scoular, Jane. 2004. The ‘subject” of prostitution: Interpreting the discursive, symbolic and material position of sex/work in feminist theory. Feminist Theory 5: 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 2003. The place of care: The relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy. Feminist Theory 4: 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scoular, Jane, and Maggie O’ Neill. 2007. Regulating prostitution, social Inclusion, responsibilisation and the politics of prostitution reform. The British Journal of Criminology 47: 764–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sullivan, Barbara. 2010. Human trafficking. In Gender matters in global politics, a feminist introduction to international relations, ed. Laura J. Shepherd, 89–102. London: Routlege.Google Scholar
  45. Van Houtum, Henk. 2010. Human blacklisting: the global apartheid of the EU’s external border regime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28: 957–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vaughan-Williams, Nick. 2010. The UK border security continuum: Virtual biopolitics and the simulation of the sovereign ban. Environment and Planning D 28: 1071–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolfenden Committee. 1957. Wolfenden report on homosexual offences and prostitution. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  48. Young, Iris Marion. 2002. Lived body vs. gender: Reflections on social structure and subjectivity. Ratio 15: 410–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. Ludwig-Maximilian UniversityMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations