Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 165–184

Coercion, Consent and the Forced Marriage Debate in the UK



An examination of case law on forced marriage reveals that in addition to physical force, the role of emotional pressure is now taken into consideration. However, in both legal and policy discourse, the difference between arranged and forced marriage continues to be framed in binary terms and hinges on the concept of consent: the context in which consent is constructed largely remains unexplored. By examining the socio-cultural construction of personhood, especially womanhood, and the intersecting structural inequalities that constrain particular groups of South Asian women in the UK, we argue that consent and coercion in relation to marriage can be better understood as two ends of a continuum, between which lie degrees of socio-cultural expectation, control, persuasion, pressure, threat and force. Women who face these constraints exercise their agency in complex and contradictory ways that are not always recognised by the existing exit-centred state initiatives designed to tackle this problem.


Agency Arranged marriage Coercion Consent Forced marriage South Asian women 


  1. Abu-Odeh, Lama. 1997. Comparatively speaking: The “honour” of the “East” and the “passion” of the “West”. Utah Law Review 2: 287–307.Google Scholar
  2. Airaksinen, Timo. 1988. An analysis of coercion. Journal of Peace Research 25: 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batsleer, Janet, Erica Burman, Khatidja Chantler, Kamal Pantling, Hindene Shirley McIntosh, Sophie Smailes, and Sam Warner. 2002. Domestic violence and minoritisation—supporting women to independence. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  4. Bhopal, Kalwant. 1999. South Asian women and arranged marriages in East London. In Ethnicity, gender, and social change, ed. Rohit Barot, Harriet Bradley, and Steve Fenton, 117–134. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Bradby, Hannah. 1999. Negotiating marriage: Young Punjabi women’s assessment of their individual and family interests. In Ethnicity, gender, and social change, ed. Rohit Barot, Harriet Bradley, and Steve Fenton, 152–166. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Bredal, Anja. 2005. Arranged marriages as a multicultural battle field. In Youth, otherness, and the plural city: Modes of belonging and social life, ed. Mette Andersson, Yngve Lithman, and Ove Sernhede. Gothenburg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  7. Carline, Anna. 2005. Zoora Shah: An unusual woman. Social and Legal Studies 14: 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chetkovich, Carol. 2004. Women’s agency in a context of oppression: Assessing strategies for personal action and public policy. Hypatia 19 (4): 120–141.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, Margaret. 2002. Asking the law question: The dissolution of legal theory. Sydney: Law Book Co.Google Scholar
  12. Dustin, Moira, and Anne Phillips. 2008. Whose agenda is it? Abuses of women and abuses of “culture” in Britain. Ethnicities 8: 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feinberg, Joel. 1986. Harm to self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and Home Office. 2005. Forced marriage: A wrong not a right. London: FCO.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, Katherine. 2006. Agency. Anthropological Theory 6: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gangoli, Geetanjali, Amina Razak, and Melanie J. McCarry. 2006. Forced marriage and domestic violence among South Asian communities in North East England. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  17. Gill, Aisha. 2004. Voicing the silent fear: South Asian women’s experiences of domestic violence. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 43: 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gill, Aisha. 2005. Governing violence: Gender, community and state interventions. Community Safety Journal 4: 37–45.Google Scholar
  19. Goddard, Victoria (ed.). 2000. Gender, agency and change: Anthropological perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, Sarah. 1999. Life for “honour” killing of pregnant teenager by mother and brother. The Guardian, May 26. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,299095,00.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2009.
  21. Harding, Luke. 2000. Student saved from arranged marriage. The Guardian, 14 March. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,3973569,00.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2009.
  22. Hester, Marianne, Khatidja Chantler, and Geetanjali Gangoli. 2008. Forced marriage: The risk factors and the effect of raising the minimum age for a sponsor, and of leave to enter the UK as a spouse or fiancé(e). Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  23. Hunter, Rosemary, and Sharon Cowan (ed.). 2007. Choice and consent: Feminist engagements with law and subjectivity. London: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  24. Imkaan. 2006. Response to Home Office consultation document–“Forced marriage: A wrong not a right”. London: Imkaan.Google Scholar
  25. Kapur, Ratna. 2005. Erotic justice: Law and the new politics of postcolonialism. London: Glasshouse Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mackenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar (ed.). 2000. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. McGregor, Joan. 1988–1989. Bargaining advantages and coercion in the market. Philosophy Research Archives 14: 23–50.Google Scholar
  28. Menon, Nivedita. 2004. Recovering subversion: Feminist politics beyond the law. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  29. Meyers, Diana T. 1989. Self, society, and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mohanty, Chandra. 1988. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review 30: 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mookherjee, Monica, and Rupa Reddy. 2005. Response to the Home Office consultation document – “Forced marriage: A wrong not a right”. http://www.kent.ac.uk/clgs/documents/pdfs/clgsforcedmarriageresponse.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2009.
  32. Morgan, Kathryn. 1991. Women and the knife: Cosmetic surgery and the colonization of women’s bodies. Hypatia 6 (3): 25–53.Google Scholar
  33. Naffine, Ngaire. 2003. Who are law’s persons? From Cheshire cats to responsible subjects. Modern Law Review 66: 346–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and Third-World feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Narayan, Uma. 1998. Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism. Hypatia 13 (2): 86–106.Google Scholar
  36. Newham Asian Women’s Project. 2007. Forced Marriage Civil Protection Bill—Response to the consultation on amendments to Family Law Act. http://www.nawp.org/NAWP_FMABR.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2009.
  37. Newham Asian Women’s Project. 2008. Internal analysis of legal advocacy case notes. London: NAWP.Google Scholar
  38. Nozick, Robert. 1969. Coercion. In Philosophy, science, and method: Essays in honor of Ernest Nagel, ed. Sidney Morgenbesser, Patrick Suppes, and Morton White, 440–472. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  39. Okin, Susan M. 1989. Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Patel, Pragna. 2008. Faith in the state? Asian women’s struggles for human rights in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies 16: 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Phillips, Anne. 2003. When culture means gender: Issues of cultural defence in English courts. Modern Law Review 66: 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips, Anne, and Moira Dustin. 2004. UK initiatives on forced marriage: Regulation, dialogue and exit. Political Studies 52: 531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rai, Dhanwant K., and Ravi K. Thiara. 1997. Redefining spaces: The needs of Black women and children using refuge services in England: Their feelings, needs and priority areas for development in refuges. Bristol: Women’s Aid Federation of England.Google Scholar
  45. Razack, Sherene. 2004. Imperilled Muslim women, dangerous Muslim men and civilised Europeans: Legal and social responses to forced marriages. Feminist Legal Studies 12: 129–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reitman, Oonagh. 2005. On exit. In Minorities within minorities: Equality, rights and diversity, ed. Jeff Spinner-Halev, and Avigail Eisenberg, 189–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Richardson, Janice. 2004. Selves, persons and individuals. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  48. Samad, Yunas, and John Eade. 2002. Community perceptions of forced marriage. London: FCO.Google Scholar
  49. Sanghera, Jasvinder. 2007. Shame. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  50. Sen, Purna. 2005. “Crimes of honour”, value and meaning. In Honour: Crimes, paradigms and violence against women, ed. Lynn Welchman, and Sara Hossain, 42–63. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  51. Shaw, Alison. 2001. Kinship, cultural preference and immigration: Consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute 7: 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Southall Black Sisters. 2001. Forced marriage: An abuse of human rights one year after “A choice by right”. London: Southall Black Sisters.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, Matthew. 2008. Victims of forced marriages could total 4,000, says study. The Guardian, 11 March. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/11/gender.communities. Accessed 12 Feb 2009.
  54. Uddin, Paula, and Nazir Ahmed. 2000. A choice by right: The report of the working group on forced marriage. London: Home Office Communications Directorate.Google Scholar
  55. Volpp, Leti. 1994. (Mis) identifying culture: Asian women and the “cultural defense”. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 17: 57–101.Google Scholar
  56. Volpp, Leti. 2000. Blaming culture for bad behaviour. Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 12: 89–116.Google Scholar
  57. Walker, Margaret Urban. 1999. Getting out of line: Alternatives to life as a career. In Mother time: Women, ageing and ethics, ed. Margaret Urban Walker, 97–111. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  58. Watt, Nicholas. 1999. Terror of couple fleeing a forced marriage. The Guardian, 27 May.Google Scholar
  59. Weinstock, Daniel M. 2005. Beyond exit rights: Reframing the debate. In Minorities within minorities: Equality, rights and diversity, ed. Avigail Eisenberg, and Jeff Spinner-Halev, 227–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wendell, Susan. 1990. Oppression and victimization; choice and responsibility. Hypatia 5 (3): 15–46.Google Scholar
  61. Wertheimer, Alan. 1987. Coercion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson, Amrit. 2006. Dreams, questions, struggles: South Asian women in Britain. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wilson, Amrit. 2007. The forced marriage debate and the British state. Race and Class 49 (1): 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolf, Naomi. 1991. The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  65. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Zimmerman, David. 1981. Coercive wage offers. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: 121–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics and International StudiesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.School of Social SciencesRoehampton UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations