Feminist Legal Studies

, 16:323 | Cite as

Personal Status Laws in Morocco and Tunisia: A Comparative Exploration of the Possibilities for Equality-Enhancing Reform in Bangladesh

  • Nowrin Tamanna


This paper focuses on successful reform strategies invoked in parts of the Muslim world to address issues of gender inequality in the context of Islamic personal law. It traces the development of personal status laws in Tunisia and Morocco, exploring the models they offer in initiating equality-enhancing reforms in Bangladesh, where a secular and equality-based reform approach conflicts with Islamic-based conservatism. Recent landmark family law reforms in Morocco show the possibility of achieving ‘women-friendly’ reforms within an Islamic legal framework. Moreover, the Tunisian Personal Status Code, with its successive reforms, shows that a gender equality-based model of personal law can be successfully integrated into the Muslim way of life. This study examines the response of Muslim societies to equality-based reforms and differences in approach in initiating them. The paper maps these sometimes competing approaches, locating them within contemporary feminist debates related to gender equality in the East and West.


Bangladesh Equality Islam Law reform Morocco Personal law Tunisia 



I am indebted to Professor Joanne Conaghan for her valuable comments and encouragement.


  1. Alam, Shah. 1991. State-religion in Bangladesh: A critique of the eighth amendment to the constitution. South Asia Journal 14: 313–334.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Ghannouchi, Rachid. 2000. Secularism in the Arab Maghreb. In Islam and secularism in the Middle East, ed. Azzam Tamimi and John L. Esposito, 97–123. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Hibri, Azizah. 2000. Deconstructing patriarchal jurisprudence in Islamic law: A faithful approach. In Global critical race feminism: An international reader, ed. Adrien Katherine Wing, 221–233. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anisuzzaman, 1991. Religion, politics and the state. In Bangladesh towards 21st century, ed. Mohiuddin Ahmed, 1–12. Dhaka: CDL.Google Scholar
  5. An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1990. Towards an Islamic reformation: Civil liberties, human rights, and international law. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Association Démocratique des Femmes du Maroc. 2004. Comparison of former Moroccan Family Law with the new provisions. Accessed 8 September 2008.
  7. Bordat, Stephanie Willman, and Saida Kouzzi. 2004. The challenge of implementing Morocco’s new personal status law. Arab Reform Bulletin 2(8). Accessed 8 September 2008.
  8. Borrmans, Maurice. 1963. Code du statut personnel et evolution sociale en certains pays musulmans. Institut des Belles Lettres Arabes (IBLA) 26: 69–80.Google Scholar
  9. Collectif 95 Maghreb Egalité. 2003. One hundred steps, one hundred provisions: For an egalitarian codification of family and personal status laws in the Maghreb (Discussion Paper). London: Women Living Under Muslim Laws.Google Scholar
  10. Frohmann, Lisa, and Elizabeth Mertz. 1994. Legal reform and social construction: Violence, gender, and the law. Law and Social Inquiry 19: 829–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomez-Rivas, Camilo. 2008. Morocco’s imperfect remedy for gender inequality. Middle East Report 247 (Summer). Accessed 8 September 2008.
  12. Government of Tunisia. 2002. Combined initial and second periodic reports of States Parties to the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. UN Doc. No. CEDAW/C/TUN/1-2.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, Angela P. 1990. Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review 42: 581–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassan, Riffat. 1987. Equal before Allah? Woman-man equality in the Islamic tradition. Harvard Divinity Bulletin 17(2): 2–4.Google Scholar
  15. Hossain, Sara. 1994. Equality in the home: Women’s rights and personal laws in South Asia. In Human rights of women, ed. Rebecca J. Cook, 465–494. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hunter, Rosemary. 1996. Deconstructing the subjects of feminism: The essentialism debate in feminist theory and practice. Australian Feminist Law Journal 6: 135–162.Google Scholar
  17. Jagwanth, Saras, and Christina Murray. 2002. Ten years of transformation: How has gender equality in South Africa fared? Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 14: 255–299.Google Scholar
  18. Jhappan, Radha. 1998. The equality pit or the rehabilitation of justice. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 10: 60–107.Google Scholar
  19. Kabeer, Naila. 1989. The quest for national identity: Women, Islam and the state in Bangladesh (Discussion Paper No. 268). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Kamal, Sultana. 2001. Her unfearing mind: Women and Muslim laws in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Ain O Salish Kendro.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, Patricia. 1996. Finding common ground: Islamic values and gender equity in Tunisia’s reformed personal status law. In Shifting boundaries in marriage and divorce in Muslim communities (Special Dossier), 75–105. London: Women Living Under Muslim Laws.Google Scholar
  22. Larson, Jane. 1993. Introduction: Third wave—Can feminists use the law to effect social change in the 1990s? Northwestern University Law Review 87: 1252–1253.Google Scholar
  23. Maddy-Weitzman, Bruce. 2005. Women, Islam, and the Moroccan state: The struggle over the personal status law. Middle East Journal 59: 393–410.Google Scholar
  24. Mahmood, Saba. 2001. Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology 16: 202–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahmood, Saba. 2003. Questioning liberalism, too: A response to ‘Islam and the challenge of democracy’. Boston Review: A Political and Literary Forum 28(2): 18–20.Google Scholar
  26. Mahmood, Saba. 2006. Secularism, hermeneutics, empire: The politics of Islamic reformation. Public Culture 18(2): 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayer, Ann Elizabeth. 1996. Reform of personal status laws in North Africa: A problem of Islamic or Mediterranean laws? London: Women Living Under Muslim Laws.Google Scholar
  28. Mernisssi, Fatima. 1991. The veil and the male elite: A feminist interpretation of women’s rights in Islam. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  29. Ministry of Women and Family Affairs, Tunisia. 1999. Post-Beijing plan of action (1997–2001). Accessed 8 September 2008.
  30. Moghissi, Haideh. 2000. Feminism and Islamic fundamentalism: The limits of postmodern analysis. Dhaka: UPL.Google Scholar
  31. Mojab, Shahrzad. 2001. Theorizing the politics of “Islamic feminism”. Feminist Review 69: 124–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monsoor, Taslima. 1999. From patriarchy to gender equity: Family law and its impact on women in Bangladesh. Dhaka: UPL.Google Scholar
  33. Murshid, Tazeen M. 1996. The sacred and the secular: Bengal Muslim discourses 1871–1977. Dhaka: UPL.Google Scholar
  34. Schacht, Joseph. 1964. Introduction to Islamic law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Serajuddin, Alamgir Muhammad. 1991. Shari’a law and society: Tradition and change in the Indian Subcontinent. Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  36. Shahidian, Hammed. 1994. The Iranian left and “the women question” in the revolution of 1978–79. International Journal of Middle East Studies 26: 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sobhan, Salma. 1978. Legal status of women in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Law and International Affairs.Google Scholar
  38. Tamimi, Azzam. 2001. Rachid Ghannouchi: A democrat within Islamism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. The Law Commission, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. 2005. Report on a reference by the government towards the possibility of framing out of a Uniform Family Code for all communities of Bangladesh relating to marriage, divorce, guardianship, inheritance etc. Accessed 8 September 2008.
  40. Wing, Adrien Katherine. 2000. Global critical race feminism: An international reader. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations