Market Conditions and Calendar Anomalies in Japanese Stock Returns
- 21 Downloads
This study revisits calendar anomalies in Japanese stock returns to examine whether they can be explained by market conditions. Results of the OLS and GARCH (1,1) regression models show that most of the well-known calendar anomalies no longer exist in Japanese stock returns when conventional methodologies are used. These calendar anomalies became evident during the Japanese bubble period and disappeared subsequently. To provide new evidence on calendar anomalies in Japanese stock returns, we examine calendar anomalies based on market conditions. We show that the day-of-the-week, January, turn-of-the-month, Halloween and Dekansho-bushi effects became evident in UP market conditions only. They were never evident in DOWN market conditions. All these anomalies are still found to be significant in UP market conditions. Our explanation is consistent throughout the whole sample period and is robust against the choice of index used to measure market returns.
KeywordsCalendar anomalies Day of the week effect Dekansho-bushi effect Halloween effect January effect Turn of the month effect
JEL ClassificationsG12 G14
- Booth, D. G., & Keim, D. B. (2000). Is there still a January effect? In D. B. Keim & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Security market imperfections in worldwide equity returns (pp. 169–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Daniel, K., & Titman, S. (2000). Market inefficiency in an irrational World. NBER Working Paper No. 7489, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Gu, A. Y. (2003). The declining January effect: Experience of five G7 countries. The International Journal of Finance, 15(1), 2465–2475.Google Scholar
- Hawawini, G., & Keim, D. B. (1995). On the predictability of common stock returns: World-wide evidence. In R. Jarrow, et al. (Eds.), Handbooks on OR & MS (Vol. 9, pp. 497–544). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Hui, T. (2005). Day of the week effect in US and Asia-Pacific stock markets during the Asian financial crisis: A non-parametric approach. The International Journal of Management Science, 33, 277–282.Google Scholar
- Jacobsen, B., & Zhang, C. Y. (2014). The Halloween indicator, “sell in May and go away”. An Even Bigger Puzzle. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2154873.
- Khan, M. S. R. (2016). Market conditions and momentum in Japanese stock returns. Journal of Behavioral Economics and Finance, 9, 30–41.Google Scholar
- Maberly, E. D., & Pierce, R. (2004). Stock market efficiency withstands another challenge: Solving the “sell in May/buy after Halloween” puzzle. Econ Journal Watch, 1(1), 29–46.Google Scholar
- Marquering W. (2002). Seasonal patterns of stock market returns. Unpublished manuscript, Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
- Schwert, G. W. (2003). Anomalies and market efficiency. In G. Constantinides, M. Harris, & M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (pp. 937–972). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar