Advertisement

Asia-Pacific Financial Markets

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 285–323 | Cite as

The Dynamic and Dependence of Takaful and Conventional Stock Return Behaviours: Evidence from the Insurance Industry in Saudi Arabia

  • Noureddine Benlagha
  • Wael HemritEmail author
Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the dynamics of volatility in the stock market using competing univariate GARCH specifications. Moreover, it provides a study of the pairwise correlation pattern of stock returns for a wide range of Saudi Arabian insurance business lines by using a dynamic DCC-GARCH model. Our results show that volatility responds asymmetrically to shocks with a persistence of variance in the stock return data, supporting the presence of irrational behaviour as well as the effectiveness of a cross-market diversification strategy. Finally, we reach a point at which, between every two-business line stock returns, there is a dynamic conditional correlation.

Keywords

Volatility Stock returns Insurance Saudi Arabia AR (1)-GJR–GARCH (1,1) DCC-GARCH 

JEL Classification

G22 C58 G41 

References

  1. Abdrashev, N. (2016). Comparison of Islamic and conventional bank stocks by value-at-risk method. Journal of Insurance and Risk Management, 1(4), 19–31.Google Scholar
  2. Abdul kader, H., Adams, M., Hardwick, P., & Kwon, W. J. (2014). Cost efficiency and board composition under different Takaful insurance business models. International Review of Financial Analysis, 32, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdulkarim, B., Lee, W. S., Abdulkarim, Z., & Jais, M. (2012). The impact of subprime mortgage crisis on Islamic banking and islamic stock market. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(3), 668–673.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmed, W. M. A. (2012). On the interdependence structure of market sector indices: the case of Qatar Exchange. Review of Accounting and Finance, 11(4), 468–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akhter, W., Pappas, V., & Khan, S. U. (2017). A comparison of Islamic and conventional insurance demand: Worldwide evidence during the Global Financial Crisis. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1401–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alam, N., Arshad, S., & Rizvi, S. (2016). Do Islamic stock indices perform better than conventional counterparts? An empirical investigation of sectoral efficiency. Review of Financial Economics, 31, 108–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alberg, D., Shalit, H., & Yosef, R. (2008). Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric GARCH models. Journal of Applied Financial Economics, 18, 1201–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alhabshi, S.O., Sharif, K., Shaikh Abdul Razak, S.H., & Ismail, E. (2012). Takāful: Realities and Challenges, Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd, Petaling Jaya. [Google Scholar].Google Scholar
  9. Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 307–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benlagha, N. (2014). Dependence structure between nominal and index-linked bond returns: A bivariate copula and DCC-GARCH approach. Applied Economics, 46(31), 3849–3860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollerslev, T. (1986). A conditional heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. Review of Economic and Statistics, 69, 542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bozovic., M., Karapandža, R., & Urošević, B. (2009). Valuing Legal Inefficiencies in Emerging Market Economies. Working paper series, 076, Regional Comparative Advantage and Knowledge Based Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
  13. Dutt, T., & Humphery-Jenner, M. (2013). Stock return volatility, operating performance and stock returns: International evidence on drivers of the ‘low volatility’ anomaly. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(3), 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engle, R. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engle, R. F. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engle, R., & Colacito, R. (2006). Testing and valuing dynamic correlations for asset allocation. American Statistical Association Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 24(2), 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engle, R. F., & Ng, V. (1993). Measuring and testing the impact of News on Volatility. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1749–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Engle, R. F., & Patton, A. J. (2001). What good is a volatility model? Quantitative Finance, 1, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engle., R. F., & Sheppard, K. (2001). Theoretical and empirical properties of dynamic conditional correlation multivariate GARCH. National Bureau Economic Research, working paper, No 8554.Google Scholar
  20. Financial Stability Reported by Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency SAMA, 2015.Google Scholar
  21. Fowler, S. J., & Hope, C. (2007). Incorporating sustainable business practices into company strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillemot, L., Farm, J. D., & Lillo, F. (2007). There’s more to volatility than volume. Quantitative Finance, 6(5), 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance, 48, 1779–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Godlewski, C. G., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. (2013). Sukuk vs. conventional bonds: A stock market perspective. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(3), 745–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goyal, A. (2000). Predictability of stock return volatility from GARCH models. Retrieved January 2016, from http://www.hec.unil.ch/agoyal/docs/Garch.pdf.
  26. Guyot, A. (2011). Efficiency and dynamics of Islamic investment: Evidence of geopolitical effects on Dow Jones Islamic market indexes. Emerging Markets Finance Trade, 47(6), 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haddad, M., & Hakim S. (2008). Irrational Exuberance on the Saudi Stock Exchange. Equity and economic development. In ERF Fifth Annual Conference, 23rd–25th November, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  28. Hammoudeh, S., Mensi, W., Reboredo, J. C., & Nguyen, D. K. (2014). Dynamic dependence of the global Islamic equity index with global conventional equity market indices and risk factors. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 30, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hernandez, J. A., Hammoudeh, S., Nguyen, D. K., Al Janabi, M. A. M., & Reboredo, J. C. (2017). Global financial crisis and dependence risk analysis of sector portfolios: A vine copula approach. Journal of Applied Economics, 49(25), 2409–2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirshleifer, D., Subrahmanyam, A., & Titman, S. (2006). Feedback and the success of irrational investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 311–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Imas, A. (2014). The realization effect: risk-taking after realized versus paper losses (March 23, 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2403865.
  32. Jawadi, F., Jawadi, N., & Louhichi, W. (2014). Conventional and Islamic stock price performance: An empirical investigation. International Economics., 137, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kwon, W. J. (2007). Islamic principles and Takaful insurance: Re-evaluation. National Association of Insurance Commissioners.Google Scholar
  34. Lin, Z. (2018). Modelling and forecasting the stock market volatility of SSE Composite Index using GARCH models. Future Generation Computer Systems, 79(3), 960–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Llorente, G., Michaely, R., Sarr, G., & Wang, J. (2002). Dynamic volume-return relation of individual stocks. The Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1005–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Majdoub, J., Mansour, W., & Jouini, J. (2016). Market integration between conventional and Islamic stock prices. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 37, 436–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. The Journal of Business, 36, 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2015). Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mensi, W., Beljid, M., Boubaker, A., & Managi, S. (2016). Correlations and volatility spillovers across commodity and stock markets: Linking energies, food, and gold. Economic Modelling, 32, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mills, T. C., & Markellos, R. N. (2008). The econometric modelling of financial time series (3rd ed., p. 2008). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moerman, G. A. (2008). Diversification in Euro area stock markets: Country versus industry. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27, 1122–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naifar, N. (2016). Dependence structure between sukuk (Islamic bonds) and stock market conditions: An empirical analysis with Archimedean copulas. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 44, 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. National Company for Cooperative Insurance (2014). Evolution and Growth. Islamic financial services overview (pp. 107–114).Google Scholar
  44. Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peng, L., & Qiwei, Y. (2003). Least absolute deviations estimation for ARCH and GARCH models. Biometrika, 90(4), 967–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poon, S. (2005). A practical guide to forecasting financial market volatility (1st ed.). England: Wiley Finance.Google Scholar
  47. Rizvi, S. A. R., & Arshad, S. (2014). Investigating the efficiency of East Asian stock markets through booms and busts. Pacific Science Review, 16(4), 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saiti, B., Bacha, O. I., & Masih, M. (2014). The diversification benefits from Islamic investment during the financial turmoil: the case for the US-based equity investors. Borsa Istanbul Review, 14(4), 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shahzad, S. J. H., Ferrer, R., Ballester, L., & Umar, Z. (2017). Risk transmission between Islamic and conventional stock markets: A return and volatility spillover analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 52, 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Silvennoinen, A., & Terasvirta, T. (2008). Multivariate GARCH models. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance No. 669.Google Scholar
  51. Takaishi, T. (2017). Rational GARCH model: An empirical test for stock returns. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 473, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Umar, Z., & Suleman, T. (2017). Asymmetric return and volatility transmission in conventional and islamic equities. Risks, 5, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yilmaz, M. K., Sensoy, A., Ozturk, K., & Hacihasanoglu, E. (2015). Cross-sectoral interactions in Islamic equity markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 32, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zakoian, J. M. (1994). Threshold heteroskedastic models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(5), 931–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance and Economics, College of Business and EconomicsQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  2. 2.Department of Insurance and Risk Management, College of Economics and Administrative SciencesAl Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU)RiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations