Advertisement

Asia-Pacific Financial Markets

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 71–86 | Cite as

Success Factors of Financial Derivatives Markets in Asia

  • Trin Sittisawad
  • Pariyada Sukcharoensin
Article
  • 212 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the success factors of financial derivatives markets in Asia. The selected countries include Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Japan and Hong Kong. The success factors of financial derivatives markets in Asia are examined by employing the panel regression. The empirical results show that size, volatility, and liquidity of spot market are significant factors for the success of financial derivatives markets in sample countries. Further, tick size, contract size, and option-type also enhance trading volumes while product age is not statistically significant. The results from this study provide important implications in developing the financial derivatives market which plays an important role in the capital market.

Keywords

Asia Derivatives market Financial derivatives Success model 

JEL Classification

G10 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Funding was provided by National Research Council of Thailand.

References

  1. Antoniou, A., Ergul, N., & Holmes, P. (1997). Market efficiency, thin trading and nonlinear behaviour: Evidence from an emerging market. European Financial Management, 3(2), 175–190.Google Scholar
  2. Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2003). Emerging markets finance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(February), 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekkerman, A., & Tejeda, H. A. (2017). Revisiting the determinants of futures contracts success: The role of market participants. Agricultural Economics, 48(March), 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bialkowski, J. P., & Jakubowski, J. (2012). Determinants of trading activity on the single-stock futures market: Evidence from the Eurex exchange. Journal of Derivatives, 19(2), 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bialkowski J. P., & Koeman, J. (2018). Does the design of spot markets matter for the success of futures markets? Evidence from dairy futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 38(3), 373–389.Google Scholar
  7. Black, G. (1986). Success and failure of futures contracts: Theory and empirical evidence. Monograph Series in Finance and Economics, 1(Winter), 1–17.Google Scholar
  8. Bollen, N., Smith, T., & Whaley, R. (2003). Optimal contract design: For whom? Journal of Futures Markets, 23(August), 719–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brorsen, B. W., & Fofana, N. F. (2001). Success and failure of agricultural futures contracts. Journal of Agribusiness, 19(2), 129–146.Google Scholar
  10. Carlton, D. W. (1984). Futures markets: Their purpose, their history, their growth, their successes and failures. Journal of Futures Markets, 4(3), 237–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2001). Market liquidity and trading activity. The Journal of Finance, 56(April), 501–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corkish, J., Holland, A., & Vila, A. (1997). The determinants of successful financial innovation: An empirical analysis of futures innovation on LIFFE. London: Bank of England.Google Scholar
  13. Cornell, B. (1981). The relationship between volume and price variability in futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 1(Fall), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia, P., Irwin, S. H., & Smith, A. (2015). Futures market failure? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(1), 40–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis—Advantages and challenges. Test, 16(May), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston, E. T., & McConnell, J. J. (1989). Requiem for a market: An analysis of the rise and fall of a financial futures contract. Review of Financial Studies, 2(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rutledge, D. J. S. (1984). Trading volume and price variability: New evidence on the price effects of speculation. In A. E. Peck (Ed.), Selected writings on futures markets: Research directions in commodity markets (pp. 237–251). Chicago: Chicago Board of Trade.Google Scholar
  18. Tashjian, E., & Weissman, M. (1995). Advantages to competing with yourself: Why an exchange might design futures contracts with correlated payoffs. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 4(April), 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Till, H. F. (2014). Why some futures contracts succeed and others fail: A survey of relevant research. Working paper. EDHEC-Risk Institute. https://www.edhec.edu/sites/www.edhec-portail.pprod.net/files/publications/pdf/edhec-working-paper-why-some-futures-contracts_1436277798888-pdfjpg. Accessed 20 Sept 2016.
  20. Tsetsekos, G., & Varrangis, P. (2000). Lessons in structuring derivatives exchanges. World Bank Research Observer, 15(February), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Waweru, M., & Yu-Kyung, K. (2013). Exchange-traded equity derivatives products: What determines their success? International Journal of Business & Economics Perspectives, 8(July), 71–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AEC Securities Public Company LimitedBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Graduate School of Development EconomicsNational Institute of Development AdministrationBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations