Modeling of Contagious Credit Events and Risk Analysis of Credit Portfolios
- 200 Downloads
We present a new model of the occurence of credit events such as rating changes and defaults for risk analyses of some portfolio credit derivatives. The framework of our model is based on a so-called top-down approach. Specifically, we first consider modeling the point process of each type of credit event in the whole economy using a self-exciting intensity process. Next, we characterize the point processes of credit events in the underlying sub-portfolio using random thinning processes specified by the distribution of credit ratings in the sub-portfolio. One of the main features of our model is that the model can capture credit risk contagion simultaneously among several credit portfolios. We present a credit event simulation algorithm based on our model and illustrate an application of the model to risk analyses of loan portfolios.
KeywordsCredit risk Rating change Self-exciting intensity model State-dependent Top-down approach
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Azizpour, S., Giesecke, K., & Kim, B. (2010). Premia for correlated default risk. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, forthcoming, from http://www.stanford.edu/dept/MSandE/cgi-bin/people/faculty/giesecke/giesecke.php.
- Giesecke, K., Goldberg, L. R., & Ding, X. (2010). A top-down approach to multi-name credit. Operations Research, forthcoming, from http://www.stanford.edu/dept/MSandE/cgi-bin/people/faculty/giesecke/giesecke.php.
- Nakagawa, H. (2008). Multi-downgrade protection with top-down approach. The Past, Present, and Future of Financial Technology, MTEC journal 15, 451–481. (Mitsubishi UFJ Trust Investment Technology Institute Co., (written in Japanese)).Google Scholar
- Nakagawa H. (2010a) Modeling of contagious downgrades and its application to multi-downgrade protection. JSIAM Letters 2: 65–68Google Scholar
- Nakagawa H. (2010b) Analysis of records of credit rating transition with mutually exciting rating-change intensity model. Transactions of the Japan Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 20: 183–202 (written in Japanese)Google Scholar