Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes
Dissemination of information on a genetically increased risk should according to guidelines primarily be family-mediated. Incomplete and incorrect information spread has, however, been documented and implies missed possibilities for prevention. In Denmark, the national HNPCC register has been granted an exception to send unsolicited letters with information on hereditary colorectal cancer and an invitation to genetic counseling to members of families with familial and hereditary colorectal cancer. To evaluate this approach, we investigated reactions and attitudes to unsolicited letters in 708 members of families with genetic predisposition and in 1600 individuals from the general population. Support for information letters was expressed by 78% of the family members and by 82% of the general population. Regarding route of information, 90% of family members preferred a letter to no information, 66% preferred information from the hospital rather than from family members and 40% preferred to obtain information from a close family member. Our results suggest that use of unsolicited information letters from the health care system may be a feasible and highly acceptable strategy to disseminate information to families at high risk of colorectal cancer.
KeywordsHereditary colorectal cancer Dissemination of genetic information Direct approach Attitudes towards unsolicited risk information Reactions to risk information
- 9.Vos J, Menko F, Jansen AM et al (2011) A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives. Fam Cancer 10:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-010-9385-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Nejadtaghi M, Jafari H, Farrokhi E, Samani KG (2017) Familial colorectal cancer type X (FCCTX) and the correlation with various genes: a systematic review. Curr Probl Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.10.002 Google Scholar
- 22.Chivers Seymour K, Addington-Hall J, Lucassen AM, Foster CL (2010) What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. J Genet Couns 19:330–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bradbury AR, Dignam JJ, Ibe CN et al (2007) How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family’s risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults. J Clin Oncol 25:3705–3711. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Kohut K, Manno M, Gallinger S, Esplen MJ (2007) Should healthcare providers have a duty to warn family members of individuals with an HNPCC-causing mutation? A survey of patients from the Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry. J Med Genet 44:404–407. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2006.047357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar