Familial Cancer

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 493–502

Outcomes of a systems-level intervention offering breast cancer risk assessments to low-income underserved women

  • Darren Mays
  • McKane E. Sharff
  • Tiffani A. DeMarco
  • Bernice Williams
  • Beth Beck
  • Vanessa B. Sheppard
  • Beth N. Peshkin
  • Jennifer Eng-Wong
  • Kenneth P. Tercyak
Original Article

Abstract

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessments (CRAs) are underutilized by low-income and racial/ethnic minority women, potentially exacerbating cancer-related disparities observed within these populations. We deployed and evaluated a systems-level intervention designed to identify patients potentially at-risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, refer them for CRAs, and facilitate CRA utilization at an urban community-based breast health care center. Cancer family history forms were completed by patients seen at the center during an 18-month period and reviewed by staff for CRA eligibility against published referral criteria. A patient navigator educated eligible patients about the benefits of CRA, navigating interested patients to this service. CRA-specific patient interest and utilization outcomes are reported. In total, 94.7 % of all patients (n = 2,436) completed forms and 65 patients (2.7 %) met CRA eligibility criteria. Most eligible patients (72.3 %) were interested in CRA. Interested patients had a greater risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (i.e., more affected relatives, greater objective risk scores) than uninterested patients: 57.4 % scheduled a CRA appointment and 51.9 % of scheduled patients utilized CRAs. Patients scheduling a CRA were contacted in less time and required fewer follow-up contacts by the patient navigator, and were more likely to be African American, than those who declined a CRA or were lost to follow-up (all p’s ≤ .05). The systems-level intervention successfully identified patients eligible for CRA and linked interested and at-risk patients with CRA resources. More intensive patient navigation addressing the unique barriers encountered within this population may be required to enhance utilization.

Keywords

Cancer risk assessment Systems intervention Disparities Underserved populations 

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society (2009) Cancer facts & figures for African Americans 2009–2010. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/document/cffaa20092010pdf.pdf. Cited 3 Nov 2011
  2. 2.
    Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyer A (2009) Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 36:237–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen S, Parmigiani G (2007) Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol 25:1329–1333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG (2010) Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:680–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robson ME, Storm CD, Weitzel J, Wollins DS, Offit K, American Society of Clinical Oncology (2010) American society of clinical oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 28:893–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peshkin BN, DeMarco TA, Brogan BM, Lerman C, Isaacs C (2001) BRCA1/2 testing: complex themes in result interpretation. J Clin Oncol 19:2555–2565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berliner JL, Fay AM, Practice Issues Subcommittee of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (2007) Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 16:241–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ready K, Arun B (2010) Clinical assessment of breast cancer risk based on family history. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8:1148–1155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trepanier A, Ahrens M, McKinnon W et al (2004) Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 13:83–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weitzel JN (1999) Genetic cancer risk assessment. Putting it all together. Cancer 86:2483–2492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW (2010) Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 60:99–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dankwa-Mullan I, Rhee KB, Williams K et al (2010) The science of eliminating health disparities: summary and analysis of the NIH summit recommendations. Am J Public Health 100(Suppl 1):S12–S18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerend MA, Pai M (2008) Social determinants of Black-White disparities in breast cancer mortality: a review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:2913–2923PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ooi SL, Martinez ME, Li CI (2011) Disparities in breast cancer characteristics and outcomes by race/ethnicity. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127:729–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ricker C, Lagos V, Feldman N et al (2006) If we build it… will they come?–establishing a cancer genetics services clinic for an underserved predominantly Latina cohort. J Genet Couns 15:505–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forman AD, Hall MJ (2009) Influence of race/ethnicity on genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Breast J 15(Suppl 1):S56–S62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simon MS, Petrucelli N (2009) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome: the impact of race on uptake of genetic counseling and testing. Methods Mol Biol 471:487–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J, Putt M (2005) Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA 293:1729–1736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Armstrong K, Weber B, Stopfer J et al (2003) Early use of clinical BRCA1/2 testing: associations with race and breast cancer risk. Am J Med Genet A 117A:154–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vadaparampil ST, McIntyre J, Quinn GP (2010) Awareness, perceptions, and provider recommendation related to genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer risk among at-risk Hispanic women: similarities and variations by sub-ethnicity. J Genet Couns 19:618–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall MJ, Olopade OI (2006) Disparities in genetic testing: thinking outside the BRCA box. J Clin Oncol 24:2197–2203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Duteau-Buck C et al (2002) Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1579–1585PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pagan JA, Su D, Li L, Armstrong K, Asch DA (2009) Racial and ethnic disparities in awareness of genetic testing for cancer risk. Am J Prev Med 37:524–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wideroff L, Vadaparampil ST, Breen N, Croyle RT, Freedman AN (2003) Awareness of genetic testing for increased cancer risk in the year 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Community Genet 6:147–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peters N, Rose A, Armstrong K (2004) The association between race and attitudes about predictive genetic testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:361–365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Armstrong K, Weber B, Ubel PA, Guerra C, Schwartz JS (2002) Interest in BRCA1/2 testing in a primary care population. Prev Med 34:590–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Halbert CH, Kessler LJ, Mitchell E (2005) Genetic testing for inherited breast cancer risk in African Americans. Cancer Invest 23:285–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Jandorf L, Redd W (2003) Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women. Patient Educ Couns 51:217–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sheppard VB, Mays D, LaVeist T, Tercyak KP (2011) Medical mistrust influences Black women’s engagement in BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing. J Natl Med Assoc (in press)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282:1458–1465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Doksum T, Bernhardt BA, Holtzman NA (2003) Does knowledge about the genetics of breast cancer differ between nongeneticist physicians who do or do not discuss or order BRCA testing? Genet Med 5:99–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scheuner MT, Sieverding P, Shekelle PG (2008) Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. JAMA 299:1320–1334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Graves KD, Christopher J, Harrison TM, Peshkin BN, Isaacs C, Sheppard VB (2011) Providers’ perceptions and practices regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing in African American women. J Genet Couns August 6 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Durfy SJ, Bowen DJ, McTiernan A, Sporleder J, Burke W (1999) Attitudes and interest in genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in diverse groups of women in western Washington. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:369–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hughes C, Gomez-Caminero A, Benkendorf J et al (1997) Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk. Patient Educ Couns 32:51–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kinney AY, Croyle RT, Dudley WN, Bailey CA, Pelias MK, Neuhausen SL (2001) Knowledge, attitudes, and interest in breast-ovarian cancer gene testing: a survey of a large African-American kindred with a BRCA1 mutation. Prev Med 33:543–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ramirez AG, Aparicio-Ting FE, de Majors SS, Miller AR (2006) Interest, awareness, and perceptions of genetic testing among Hispanic family members of breast cancer survivors. Ethn Dis 16:398–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lipkus IM, Iden D, Terrenoire J, Feaganes JR (1999) Relationships among breast cancer concern, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility among African-American women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:533–539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK (2002) The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:59–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Paskett ED, Harrop JP, Wells KJ (2011) Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science. CA Cancer J Clin 61:237–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ et al (2008) Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer 113:1999–2010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee R, Beattie M, Crawford B et al (2005) Recruitment, genetic counseling, and BRCA testing for underserved women at a public hospital. Genet Test 9:306–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hall M, Olopade OI (2005) Confronting genetic testing disparities: knowledge is power. JAMA 293:1783–1785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Masi CM, Blackman DJ, Peek ME (2007) Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority women. Med Care Res Rev 64:195S–242SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rahm AK, Sukhanova A, Ellis J, Mouchawar J (2007) Increasing utilization of cancer genetic counseling services using a patient navigator model. J Genet Couns 16:171–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vargas RB, Ryan GW, Jackson CA, Rodriguez R, Freeman HP (2008) Characteristics of the original patient navigation programs to reduce disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Cancer 113:426–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gilpin CA, Carson N, Hunter AG (2000) A preliminary validation of a family history assessment form to select women at risk for breast or ovarian cancer for referral to a genetics center. Clin Genet 58:299–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hoskins KF, Zwaagstra A, Ranz M (2006) Validation of a tool for identifying women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer in population-based screening. Cancer 107:1769–1776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Reid GT, Walter FM, Brisbane JM, Emery JD (2009) Family history questionnaires designed for clinical use: a systematic review. Public Health Genomics 12:73–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R (2003) Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). J Epidemiol Community Health 57:186–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O (1998) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 62:145–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Berry DA, Iversen ES Jr, Gudbjartsson DF et al (2002) BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. J Clin Oncol 20:2701–2712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Huo D, Senie RT, Daly M et al (2009) Prediction of BRCA mutations using the BRCAPRO model in clinic-based African American, Hispanic, and other minority families in the United States. J Clin Oncol 27:1184–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nanda R, Schumm LP, Cummings S et al (2005) Genetic testing in an ethnically diverse cohort of high-risk women: a comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in American families of European and African ancestry. JAMA 294:1925–1933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vogel KJ, Atchley DP, Erlichman J et al (2007) BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing in Hispanic patients: mutation prevalence and evaluation of the BRCAPRO risk assessment model. J Clin Oncol 25:4635–4641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    James PA, Doherty R, Harris M et al (2006) Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing: a comparison of available methods. J Clin Oncol 24:707–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59:225–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fackenthal JD, Olopade OI (2007) Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations. Nat Rev Cancer 7:937–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Halbert CH, Kessler L, Troxel AB, Stopfer JE, Domchek S (2010) Effect of genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in African American women: a randomized trial. Public Health Genomics 13:440–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kinney AY, Gammon A, Coxworth J, Simonsen SE, Arce-Laretta M (2010) Exploring attitudes, beliefs, and communication preferences of Latino community members regarding BRCA1/2 mutation testing and preventive strategies. Genet Med 12:105–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rolnick SJ, Rahm AK, Jackson JM et al (2011) Barriers in identification and referral to genetic counseling for familial cancer risk: the perspective of genetic service providers. J Genet Couns 20:314–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren Mays
    • 1
  • McKane E. Sharff
    • 1
  • Tiffani A. DeMarco
    • 1
  • Bernice Williams
    • 2
  • Beth Beck
    • 2
  • Vanessa B. Sheppard
    • 1
  • Beth N. Peshkin
    • 1
  • Jennifer Eng-Wong
    • 3
  • Kenneth P. Tercyak
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Health Outcomes and Health Behaviors, Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive CancerGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of MedicineGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations