Linkage to chromosome 2q32.2-q33.3 in familial serrated neoplasia (Jass syndrome)
Causative genetic variants have to date been identified for only a small proportion of familial colorectal cancer (CRC). While conditions such as Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and Lynch syndrome have well defined genetic causes, the search for variants underlying the remainder of familial CRC is plagued by genetic heterogeneity. The recent identification of families with a heritable predisposition to malignancies arising through the serrated pathway (familial serrated neoplasia or Jass syndrome) provides an opportunity to study a subset of familial CRC in which heterogeneity may be greatly reduced. A genome-wide linkage screen was performed on a large family displaying a dominantly-inherited predisposition to serrated neoplasia genotyped using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 10 K SNP Array. Parametric and nonparametric analyses were performed and resulting regions of interest, as well as previously reported CRC susceptibility loci at 3q22, 7q31 and 9q22, were followed up by finemapping in 10 serrated neoplasia families. Genome-wide linkage analysis revealed regions of interest at 2p25.2-p25.1, 2q24.3-q37.1 and 8p21.2-q12.1. Finemapping linkage and haplotype analyses identified 2q32.2-q33.3 as the region most likely to harbour linkage, with heterogeneity logarithm of the odds (HLOD) 2.09 and nonparametric linkage (NPL) score 2.36 (P = 0.004). Five primary candidate genes (CFLAR, CASP10, CASP8, FZD7 and BMPR2) were sequenced and no segregating variants identified. There was no evidence of linkage to previously reported loci on chromosomes 3, 7 and 9.
KeywordsSerrated neoplasia Familial cancer Linkage
Heterogeneity logarithm of the odds
Logarithm of the odds
The identification of a causative genetic variant in cancer-prone families such as those with Lynch syndrome is an important determinant of decreased mortality through more focussed cancer surveillance . In addition, colorectal cancers (CRC) arising in Lynch syndrome show molecular and pathology features, such as immunohistochemical loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene expression and increased tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, which allow them to be distinguished from among unselected series. However, less than 3% of all CRC is accounted for by this well-characterised condition, in which the cancers develop from adenomatous polyps [2, 3].
Several studies examining linkage in non-syndromic CRC families have reported statistically significant associations at 3q22 [4, 5, 6, 7] and 9q22 [8, 9, 10, 11]. A more recent study found linkage to 7q31 in colorectal neoplasia families, and confirmed the region at 3q22 as a susceptibility locus for CRC . To date no confirmed causative variants have been identified from these regions, though the reported associations remain robust.
The balance of families with CRC predisposition are likely to show genetic heterogeneity and variable penetrance, thereby limiting the power of genome-wide linkage approaches to define critical regions in the absence of stratification. The description of families with multiple cases of neoplasia in which serrated polyps are prominent has facilitated the exploration of a proportion of the remaining unexplained familial aggregation. Such families were initially reported from New Zealand by the late Professor Jass and colleagues in the mid-nineties [13, 14], and a further publication demonstrated the familial involvement of hyperplastic polyposis , associated with LOH at chromosome 1p. Families fulfilling the Amsterdam I criteria with mixed epithelial polyps and variable levels of microsatellite instability (MSI) in which Lynch syndrome could be excluded, and which showed some overlap with hyperplastic polyposis, were reported in 2005 . Such families are characterised by a mixture of serrated and adenomatous polyps, and, in contrast to Lynch syndrome, somatic BRAF mutation is commonly observed in CRC. Only a minority of cancers demonstrate MMR deficiency, attributable to methylation of the MLH1 gene promoter. We refer to this condition of serrated neoplasia and adenomas clustering in families as Jass syndrome, after the pathologist who first described it [13, 14].
Studies on unselected series of CRCs have shown that molecular features of the serrated pathway, such as widespread CpG island methylation and somatic BRAF mutation, as well as the presence of serrated lesions with atypical histology (sessile serrated adenomas), are associated with a family history of CRC [17, 18, 19], lending further support to the idea that the observed familial aggregation of lesions arising through the serrated pathway is the result of an inherited predisposition. In addition, the presence of a sessile serrated adenoma is associated with polyp multiplicity [19, 20], and with conventional adenomas in patients who do not meet the criteria for hyperplastic polyposis . In patients with hyperplastic polyposis, polyps with adenomatous elements increase the risk of CRC [22, 23, 24], and are the likely lesions of origin for at least some of the cancers occurring in this condition .
We have investigated genomic regions associated with Jass syndrome by performing a genome-wide linkage screen in a single large family, followed by finemapping in a further 10 families, and present evidence for linkage to chromosome 2q32.2-q33.3. Through further finemapping analysis, we also provide evidence that previously reported CRC susceptibility loci at 3q22, 7q31 and 9q22 are unlikely to contribute to Jass syndrome.
Materials and methods
The 11 families in this study, five of which have been described previously , were enrolled from high-risk genetics clinics in Australia as part of the Colon Cancer Family Registry, an international collaborative registry for the study of genetics and epidemiology of colorectal cancer . All participants gave written informed consent to take part in research, and the project was performed under QIMR Human Research Ethics Committee Approval P912 (Genetics of Serrated Neoplasia).
Polyps were reviewed by a specialist gastro-intestinal pathologist (JRJ). MSI status of tumours was determined using a panel of 10 microsatellite markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, BAT-34C4, BAT-40, D5S346, D10S197, D17S250, D18S55, ACTC and MYCL) and standard techniques [16, 27]. BRAF V600E mutation status of tumours was analysed as previously described . Lynch syndrome was excluded in all families as determined by: (1) proficient expression of the MMR proteins in tumours; (2) absence of pathogenic mutations or variants of uncertain clinical significance in the MMR genes after sequencing of the coding and splice site regions and MLPA analysis for large deletions or duplications; and (3) methylation analysis of the MLH1 gene promoter. No mutations were found in any patients. Three cancers showed loss of MLH1 protein expression, of which two had sufficient DNA available for methylation analysis and tested positive for methylation of the MLH1 promoter in their tumour tissue .
a mixture of hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps;
variable levels of MSI in cancers and/or polyps
the presence of BRAF V600E somatic mutation in one or more cancers; and
at least one individual with multiple hyperplastic polyps under age 60.
Phenotypic characteristics of families
Individuals with CRC
Polyp ages (and numbers)
Hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps
Individuals with multiple hyperplastic polyps under 60 (ages)
Evidence of linkage to Region 1
45, 53, 74
63 (1), 53 (3), 51 (2), 57 (2), 46 (1)
25a, 31a, 32
29 (1), 53 (1)
25a, 31a, 54, 72, 53, 65, 63, 52
57 (10), 53 (2), 63 (1)
52, 65, 67, 70
71(1), 66 (1), 65 (7), 55 (11), 60 (2), 49 (1)
37, 44, 58, 62
37 (2), 57 (11), 51 (4), 58 (5)
3 (51, 57, 58)
31, 47, 52, 59
49 (1), 38 (1), 45 (2), 50 (7), 28 (1)
43, 53, 74
53 (6), 43 (4), 52 (4)
2 (52, 53)
31, 39, 50, 61
49 (2), 31 (2)
27, 57, 60
54, 59, 76
54 (2), 75 (1), 50 (1)
58 (2), 65 (6)
48, 53, 74, 85
85 (2), 48 (5), 50 (3), 51 (17), 53 (6)
2 (48, 51)
Genome-wide linkage screen
Both parametric and nonparametric (NPL) linkage analyses were performed using GeneHunter version 2.1  via a stepwise 900 SNP sliding window, implemented in the Alohomora GUI interface . For parametric analysis, an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance was specified, with 60% penetrance, 10% phenocopy rate and a disease allele frequency of 0.001. Families segregating serrated neoplasia show clustering of CRC, including those with somatic BRAF mutation, and polyps of adenomatous, serrated and mixed histology. Individuals with CRC and/or large, multiple or atypical serrated polyps, or any serrated or adenomatous polyp diagnosed before age 60, were classed as affected. As the prevalence of adenomas in the population increases with age , a conservative approach was taken to the classification of affected individuals in the over 60 age group, requiring adenomas to be 5 mm or greater in size, or have villous components, and excluding individuals with diminutive rectal-only lesions. Haplotypes were constructed in GeneHunter and viewed graphically using HaploPainter version 029.5 .
Twelve microsatellite markers on chromosome 2p, 22 markers on 2q, 18 markers on chromosome 3, 10 markers on chromosome 7, 12 markers on chromosome 8 and 13 markers on chromosome 9 were typed in the 11 families. Markers and primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Markers were amplified using True Allele PCR Premix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) or GoTaq Colorless Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR products were labelled with FAM, HEX or NED fluorophores, either by labelling one primer in each pair or via an M13 tag and labelled M13 primer, and separated using an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Data were analysed using GeneMarker version 1.70 or 1.75 (SoftGenetics, PA, USA). Mendelian error checking was performed using Progeny Lab 6 (Progeny Software, South Bend, IN, USA). Non-Mendelian error checking and parametric and nonparametric linkage analyses on full pedigrees were performed using SimWalk 2.91 , implemented under the easyLINKAGE Plus interface version 5.05 . Parametric linkage analysis was performed under a dominant model with 60% penetrance, 10% phenocopy rate and disease allele frequency of 0.001. Affected-only parametric analysis was performed using GeneHunter version 2.1, also under the easyLINKAGE interface, under a dominant model with 99% penetrance, 10% phenocopy rate and disease allele frequency of 0.001. For affected-only analysis, all individuals with unknown or unaffected status were classed as unknown. Marker map locations were based on the deCODE map ; positions for markers not on the deCODE map were interpolated from the nearest adjacent deCODE markers using the NCBI Map Viewer Build 36.3 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/mapview/map_search.cgi?taxid=9606). Haplotypes were constructed by SimWalk and visualised using HaploPainter.
Sequencing of exons and exon–intron boundaries of candidate genes was performed using BigDye Terminator chemistry on an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Where possible, variants were confirmed by sequencing in both forward and reverse directions.
Genome-wide linkage screen
Finemapping using microsatellite markers spanning each of the three regions of interest was carried out in Family 1 and a further 10 families (Supplementary Table 2). Family 2 showed independent segregation of affected status in two branches, each of which met the criteria for inclusion, and was therefore treated as two separate families for analysis, 2a and 2b. Five individuals overlapped between the two branches and were therefore included in the analysis as part of both Family 2a and Family 2b. In an effort to account for some of the uncertainties inherent in a newly described disease (such as penetrance, age at onset and the possibility of a proportion of affected individuals being asymptomatic), three separate analyses were performed: parametric analysis with full pedigrees, 10% phenocopy rate and 60% penetrance; nonparametric analysis; and affected-only parametric analysis with 10% phenocopy rate and 99% penetrance, in which unaffected individuals were retained only if they were parents of affected individuals, or were genotyped children of affected individuals for whom DNA was unavailable; these individuals were assigned unknown affected status.
Parametric (full pedigrees)
Regions identified from genome-wide screen on Family 1
2q (Region 1)
2q (Region 2)
Parametric (full pedigrees)
Previously published CRC susceptibility loci
Haplotype analysis at 2q and sequencing of candidate genes
Exclusion of reported CRC susceptibility loci
The contribution of recently reported CRC susceptibility loci on chromosomes 3, 7 and 9 to Jass syndrome was tested using microsatellite markers selected to cover the reported regions, and parametric, nonparametric and affected-only analyses performed as above. No evidence was found to support linkage (Table 2).
Since the discoveries of the genes responsible for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, Lynch syndrome, and the hamartomatous polyposes, little progress has been made in the identification of genetic causes for the remaining unexplained majority of familial CRC. One of the reasons for this lack of success is likely to be extensive genetic heterogeneity, which has proved to be a difficult obstacle to overcome for investigators undertaking linkage studies on collections of CRC families. Other than exclusion of known syndromes, approaches aimed at limiting the heterogeneity within a sample set have included enrichment for families with young-onset cases [8, 41], exclusion of multiple polyposis phenotypes , exclusion or inclusion of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps [41, 42], and stratification by occurrence of extracolonic cancers . While these approaches certainly limit phenotypic heterogeneity, the extent to which they reduce genetic heterogeneity is unknown.
The recent identification of a familial predisposition to colonic malignancies arising through the serrated pathway [13, 14, 16, 43] has presented an opportunity to study a subset of familial CRC in which genetic heterogeneity is more limited. Serrated neoplasia families show distinct features, such as variable levels of MSI and frequent somatic BRAF mutation in tumours and a mixture of serrated and adenomatous polyps, that allow them to be distinguished from the remainder of familial CRC. Such features characterised families with evidence of linkage to 2q. Incomplete penetrance, small family size, under-reporting due to a proportion of individuals being asymptomatic, and practical difficulties in obtaining tumour and polyp samples for all patients, however, mean that all features will not be observed in all families. In an effort to account for this, a set of criteria was developed for this study that allowed for some flexibility while still requiring families to show a clustering of CRC and polyps in conjunction with characteristics that define Jass syndrome. In this attempt to include phenotypically homogeneous families, the possibility remains that a minority of these families may have a genetic predisposition different to that responsible for the majority of Jass syndrome. While this leaves open the possibility of some families being incorrectly included, these are likely to be a minority.
A linkage strategy was selected that would maximise the possibility of identifying linkage, while minimising the effects of any heterogeneity that may remain within the selected families. To this end, the family considered the most likely to allow the identification of a strong linkage signal was subjected to a genome-wide linkage screen, followed by finemapping of regions of interest in the remaining 10 families. Loci at 2p25.2-p25.1, 2q24.3-q37.1 and 8p21.2-q12.1 were considered worthy of further investigation, with 2q24.3-q37.1 showing the strongest evidence of linkage. This region has also been identified in three previous genome-wide linkage studies [4, 6, 12] and one association study .
The consensus region at 2q32.2-q33.3 identified through finemapping linkage and haplotype analyses contains five genes that stand out as potential candidates and as a result were prioritised for sequencing. CFLAR, CASP10 and CASP8 are located in close proximity to each other at 2q33.1 and are all involved in the death receptor-induced apoptotic pathway . CASP8 somatic mutation has been reported in CRC , and a CASP8 promoter polymorphism has been reported to be associated with susceptibility to multiple cancers including CRC , although the association has not been replicated in other populations [46, 47]. CFLAR has attracted attention as a therapeutic target as well as a potential oncogene due to its role in the TRAIL pathway . FZD7 is a member of the Frizzled family which plays an important role in Wnt signalling , central to the development and progression of CRC , and has recently been shown to activate the Wnt pathway in CRC cell lines . BMPR2 inactivation leads to epithelial cell proliferation and mixed polyp formation in the mouse colon  and reduced protein expression associated with somatic mutation is observed in human CRC and cell lines . Although sequencing of these genes did not reveal any variants segregating with disease, only coding regions and exon–intron boundaries were sequenced, leaving noncoding regions, which may harbour regulatory elements and potential splicing variants, largely unexplored. With current re-sequencing technology and exome capture, the investigation of the remaining genes and regulatory regions becomes more feasible.
Several studies have reported evidence of linkage among a proportion of non-syndromic CRC families, with 3q22, 7q31 and 9q22 prominent [4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12]. As well as suggesting that they are unlikely to contribute to Jass syndrome, the failure to find evidence of linkage to these loci in the present study suggests that further characterisation of the 3q22, 7q31 and 9q22 regions should aim to exclude families demonstrating molecular and/or histological evidence of serrated neoplasia.
Approximately half of the families studied showed evidence of linkage to 2q32.2-q33.3. The balance of the families did not demonstrate linkage, suggesting that other as yet unidentified loci may contribute to families with serrated neoplasia. Continuing efforts to identify and characterise serrated neoplasia families will serve the dual purpose of allowing a greater understanding of the phenotypic presentation of the syndrome, and facilitating further genetic studies which will allow confirmation and refinement of the linked region, paving the way for more comprehensive analysis of the locus, and potentially the identification of the underlying genetic defect.
This work was supported by grants from the Cancer Council Queensland, the National Health and Medical Research Council, and the National Cancer Institute under RFA CA-95-011 (Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry Centre UO1 CA097735), and through cooperative agreements with members of the Colon Cancer Family Registry and Principal Investigators, and 1R01CA123010 (Genetics of Serrated Neoplasia). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government. JY is a Cancer Council Queensland Senior Research Fellow. The authors also thank the Jeremy Jass Memorial Tissue Bank for supply of polyps and cancers for the study.
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- 3.Young J, Simms LA, Biden KG, Wynter C, Whitehall V, Karamatic R, George J, Goldblatt J, Walpole I, Robin SA et al (2001) Features of colorectal cancers with high-level microsatellite instability occurring in familial and sporadic settings: parallel pathways of tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol 159:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kemp Z, Carvajal-Carmona L, Spain S, Barclay E, Gorman M, Martin L, Jaeger E, Brooks N, Bishop DT, Thomas H et al (2006) Evidence for a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 3q21-q24 from a high-density SNP genome-wide linkage scan. Hum Mol Genet 15:2903–2910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Middeldorp A, Jagmohan-Changur SC, van der Klift HM, van Puijenbroek M, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Webb E, Houlston R, Tops C, Vasen HFA, Devilee P et al (2010) Comprehensive genetic analysis of seven large families with mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 49:539–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Skoglund J, Djureinovic T, Zhou XL, Vandrovcova J, Renkonen E, Iselius L, Bisgaard ML, Peltomaki P, Lindblom A (2006) Linkage analysis in a large Swedish family supports the presence of a susceptibility locus for adenoma and colorectal cancer on chromosome 9q22.32-31.1. J Med Genet 43:e7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Young J, Barker MA, Simms LA, Walsh MD, Biden KG, Buchanan D, Buttenshaw R, Whitehall VL, Arnold S, Jackson L et al (2005) Evidence for BRAF mutation and variable levels of microsatellite instability in a syndrome of familial colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:254–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Spring KJ, Zhao ZZ, Karamatic R, Walsh MD, Whitehall VLJ, Pike T, Simms LA, Young J, James M, Montgomery GW et al (2006) High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 131:1400–1407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Newcomb PA, Baron J, Cotterchio M, Gallinger S, Grove J, Haile R, Hall D, Hopper JL, Jass J, Le Marchand L et al (2007) Colon cancer family registry: an international resource for studies of the genetic epidemiology of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:2331–2343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Walsh MD, Buchanan DD, Cummings MC, Pearson SA, Arnold ST, Clendenning M, Walters R, McKeone DM, Spurdle AB, Hopper JL et al (2010) Lynch syndrome-associated breast cancers: clinicopathologic characteristics of a case series from the colon cancer family registry. Clin Cancer Res 16:2414–2424Google Scholar
- 29.Poynter JN, Siegmund KD, Weisenberger DJ, Long TI, Thibodeau SN, Lindor N, Young J, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Baron JA et al (2008) Molecular Characterization of MSI-H Colorectal Cancer by MLH1 Promoter Methylation, Immunohistochemistry, and Mismatch Repair Germline Mutation Screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:3208–3215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Pendergrass CJ, Edelstein DL, Hylind LM, Phillips BT, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Romans K, Griffin CA, Cruz-Correa M, Tersmette AC, Offerhaus GJA et al (2008) Occurrence of colorectal adenomas in younger adults: an epidemiologic necropsy study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:1011–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Kodach LL, Wiercinska E, De Miranda N, Bleuming SA, Musler AR, Peppelenbosch MP, Dekker E, van den Brink GR, Van Noesel CJM, Morreau H et al (2008) The bone morphogenetic protein pathway is inactivated in the majority of sporadic colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology 134:1332–1341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar