Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers
Previous studies have documented that concerns about genetic discrimination (GD) may influence access to and participation in medically necessary care. We sought to characterize how GD issues influence current cancer genetics professional (CGP) practice, determine if their attitudes regarding GD have changed over time, and compare their knowledge and attitudes regarding laws prohibiting GD to a contemporary cohort of non-genetics clinicians. Members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Familial Cancer Special Interest Group were invited to complete a 39 item online survey, adapted from previously published instruments. The resulting data were compared to a survey of CGPs published in 2000 and to a contemporary cohort of non-genetics clinicians (n = 1,181). There were 153 qualified respondents. Compared to the historical CGP cohort (n = 163), a significantly greater proportion said they would bill insurance for the cost of genetic testing for themselves (P < 0.0001). Most CGPs (94%) considered the risk of GD to be low to theoretical, concordant with 64% who expressed confidence in existing federal laws prohibiting GD. The mean knowledge score of CGPs regarding GD protective laws was significantly greater than that of non-genetics clinicians (P < 0.001). As barometers of change, CGPs show a migration in opinion over the past 8 years, with decreased fear of GD and greater knowledge of laws prohibiting GD compared to non-genetics clinicians. Better knowledge of GD and protective legislation, may facilitate non-genetics clinician utilization of genetics and personalized medicine.
KeywordsGenetic discrimination Cancer genetics Genetic testing Health insurance Cancer genetics professional
We acknowledge Dr. Gwen Uman for her assistance with data analysis, Dr. Cindy Malone for her contributions to this project, and Janelle Hilario and Shawntel Payton for their assistance with preparation of the manuscript. This project was funded in part by the State of California, Department of Health Services, Cancer Research Program, NHGRI grant number R03 HG002846-01, and the California State University, Northridge Thesis Support Program.
- 14.NCSL (2007) Genetics and health insurance state anti-discrimination laws. http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/Health/GeneticNondiscriminationinHealthInsuranceLaws/tabid/14374/Default.aspx. Cited 13 Feb 2008
- 16.Banks K, Weitzel JN, Metzenberg A, Vandergon V, Blazer KR (2004) Cancer genetic testing and genetic discrimination: a pre-cancer risk counseling survey of patient knowledge and opinions. Paper presented at the American society of human genetics: 54th annual meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 26–30 October 2004Google Scholar
- 18.Harmon A (2008) Fear of insurance trouble leads many to shun or hide DNA tests. The New York Times. 24 Feb 2008 Sunday. Sect A, 1–4Google Scholar
- 21.Finley R (1999–2009) Surveymonkey.com, Portland, OR 97209 http://www.surveymonkey.com. Cited 13 Feb 2008
- 28.Parrott S, Del Vecchio M (2007) Professional status survey 2006. In: National society of genetic counselors, Inc. http://www.nsgc.org/client_files/career/2006_PSS_RESULTS.pdf. Cited 18 Feb 2008
- 29.Hall MA (2006) Genetic discrimination. Paper presented at the national society of genetic counselors annual education conference, Nashville, TN, 10–14 November 2006Google Scholar