Familial Cancer

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 15–18 | Cite as

Genetic testing in children and young people

  • Michael Parker


Guidelines on childhood genetic testing are in broad agreement that where there are no ‘urgent medical reasons’, presymptomatic and predictive testing for adult-onset disorders, and carrier testing should be postponed until a child is able to give his or her own consent, either as a competent young person, or as an adult. This paper explores situations in which this requirement can be in tension with genetics professionals’ and others’ judgement of what is in the child’s best interests. It concludes that whilst the guidelines do reflect a broad agreement that in most cases testing children for adult onset conditions or carrier status is inappropriate, there are at least some situations in which testing may be thought by genetics professionals to be appropriate. Many of the morally relevant features of such cases will often be context specific, i.e. to do with the child’s family and other relationships or other features of the local context and this suggests that any revision of the guidelines on genetics testing in childhood will need to take into account the need to allow space for the utilisation of judgement by genetics professionals about whether genetic testing is in the child’s best interests. In making such judgements the genetics professional will need to pay close attention to the views of the child’s parents and do all they can to facilitate input from the child him or herself.


Children Genetic testing Ethics 


  1. 1.
    Alderson P (1998) Talking to children—and talking with them. In: Clarke A (ed) The genetic testing of children. Bios, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borry P, Stultiens L, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierckx K (2006) Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Clin Genet 70:374–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borry P, Fryns JP, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K (2006) Carrier testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet 14(2):133–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borry P, Nys H, Dierickx K (2007) Carrier testing in minors: conflicting views. Nat Rev Genet 8:p828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke A (ed) (1998) The genetic testing of children. Bios, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke A, Gaff C (2008) Challenges in the genetic testing of children for familial cancers. Arch Dis Child 93(11):911–914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis DS (1997) Genetic dilemmas and the child’s right to an open future. Rutger’s Law J 28:549–592Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duncan RE (2004) Predictive genetic testing in young people: when is it appropriate? J Paediatr Child Health 40:593–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jansen L, Friedman Ross L (2001) The ethics of pre-adoption genetic testing. Am J Med Genet 104:214–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Järvinen O, Aaltob A, Lehesjokic A, Lindlöfe M, Söderlingf I, Uutelag A, Kääriäinen H (1999) Carrier testing of children for two X-linked diseases in a family based setting: a retroscpective long term psychosocial evaluation. J Med Genet 36:615–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parsons EP et al (2003) Implications of carrier identification in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. Ach Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F467–F471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Savulescu J (2001) Predictive genetic testing in children. Med J Aust 175:379–381PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ethox Centre, Department of Public HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations