Advertisement

Familial Cancer

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 105–113 | Cite as

Predictors of participation in clinical and psychosocial follow-up of the kConFab breast cancer family cohort

  • Kelly-Anne PhillipsEmail author
  • Phyllis N. Butow
  • Ailsa E. Stewart
  • Jiun-Horng Chang
  • Prue C. Weideman
  • Melanie A. Price
  • Sue Anne McLachlan
  • kConFab Investigators
  • Geoffrey J. Lindeman
  • Michael J. McKay
  • Michael L. Friedlander
  • John L. Hopper
Article

Abstract

Introduction : Prospective collection of epidemiological, psychosocial and outcome data in large breast cancer family cohorts should provide less biased data than retrospective studies regarding penetrance of breast cancer and modifiers of genetic risk. Methods: The Kathleen Cuningham Foundation for Research into Breast Cancer (kConFab) recently commenced 3-yearly follow-up on over 750 families with multiple cases of breast cancer. Clinical follow-up was by mailed self-report questionnaire to all participants, while psychosocial follow-up was only of unaffected women and consisted of two components: a mailed questionnaire and an interview regarding stressful life events. Results: To date, 1928 of 2748 (70%) participants returned the clinical follow-up questionnaire (10% opted out, 16% were non-responders, and 4% were not contactable). Of the unaffected females who returned the clinical follow-up questionnaire, 91% participated in the psychosocial follow-up. In multivariate analyses, sex, personal cancer status, marital status, age and educational status were independent predictors of response to the clinical follow-up questionnaire, and number of female children, age, and family history of breast cancer were independent predictors of response to the psychosocial follow-up. Conclusions: A first round of 3-yearly clinical and psychosocial follow-up using a mailed questionnaire was feasible in this cohort. High response rates were achieved by employing intensive tracing and reminder strategies. The predictors of response for the clinical and psychosocial follow-up components of this study should be considered in designing similar follow-up strategies for other family cancer cohorts.

Keywords

breast cancer cohort genetic psychosocial questionnaire 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pharoah, P, Day, N, Duffy, S,  et al. 1997Family history and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysisInt J Cancer71800809Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miki, Y, Swensen, J, Shattuck-Eidens, D,  et al. 1994A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1Science2666671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wooster, R, Bignell, G, Lancaster, J,  et al. 1995Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2Nature3787892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malkin, D, Li, FP, Strong, LC,  et al. 1990etal. Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasmsScience25012331238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, J, Yen, C, Liaw, D, Podsypanina, K,  et al. 1997PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancerScience27519431947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott, CL, Jenkins, MA, Southey, MC,  et al. 2003Average age-specific risk of breast cancer associated with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 estimated from families attending Australian family cancer clinicsHum Genet112542551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Easton, DF, Bishop, DT, Ford, D, Crockford, GP. 1993Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage ConsortiumAm J Hum Genet52678701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ford, D, Easton, DF, Stratton, M,  et al. 1998Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage ConsortiumAm J Hum Genet62676689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narod, SA, Dube, MP, Klijn, J,  et al. 2002Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriersJ Natl Cancer Inst9417731779PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Narod, SA, Brunet, JS, Ghadirian, P,  et al. 2000Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A case-control studyLancet35618761881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jernstrom, H, Lerman, C, Ghadirian, P,  et al. 1999Pregnancy and risk of early breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2Lancet35418461850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rebbeck, TR, Lynch, HT, Neuhausen, SL,  et al. 2002Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutationsNew Engl J Med34616161622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klaren, HM, van’t Veer, LJ, Leeuwen, FE, Rookus, MA 2003Potential for Bias in Studies on Efficacy of Prophylactic Surgery for BRCA1 and BRCA2 MutationJ Natl Cancer Inst95941947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mincey, BA 2003Genetics and the management of women at high risk for breast cancerOncologist8466473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer. http://www.kconfab.orgGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Osborne, RH, Hopper, JL, Kirk, JA,  et al. 2000kConFab: a research resource of Australasian breast cancer families. Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast CancerMed J Aust172463534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown, GW, Harris, TO. 1978Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in WomenTavistockLondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown, G, Harris, T 1989Life Events and IllnessGuildford PressNew York320324Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Loon, AJM, Tijhuis, M, Picavet, HSJ,  et al. 2003Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associationsAnn Epidemiol13105110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cotterchio, M, McKeown-Eyssen, G, Sutherland, H,  et al. 2000Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry: methods and first-year response ratesChronic Dis Canada218186Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eaker, S, Bergstrom, R, Bergstrom, A,  et al. 1998Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routinesAm J Epidemiol1477482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Butow, P, Coates, A 1999Dunn SM. Psychosocial predictors of survival in metastatic melanoma.J Clin Oncol1722562264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sutherland, J.H., Lacroix, J, Knight, J,  et al. 2001The Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry for Breast Cancer Studies: design and first year recruitment rates in OntarioJ Clin Epidemiol54938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seybolt, L.M, Vachon, C, Potter, K,  et al. 1997Evaluation of potential sources of bias in a genetic epidemiologic study of breast cancerGene Epidemiol148595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brandt, R, Hartmann, E, Ali, Z,  et al. 2002Motivations and concerns of women considering genetic testing for breast cancer: a comparison between affected and at-risk probandsGene Test6203205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meijers-Heijboer, EJ, Verhoog, LC, Brekelmans, CT,  et al. 2000Presymptomatic DNA testing and prophylactic surgery in families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutationLancet35520152020CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lerman, C, Seay, J, Balshem, A, Audrain, J 1995Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patientsAm J Med Genet5738592PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meiser, B, Butow, P, Barratt, A,  et al. 2000Attitudes to genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in women at increased risk developing hereditary breast cancerJ Med Genet37472476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jorgensen, CK, Carlsmose, B 1998A comparison of Teleform with manual data entry: validation of automated forms processingComput Biol Med28659667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hopper, J.L 2002The Australian Twin RegistryTwin Res5329336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly-Anne Phillips
    • 1
    Email author
  • Phyllis N. Butow
    • 2
  • Ailsa E. Stewart
    • 1
  • Jiun-Horng Chang
    • 3
  • Prue C. Weideman
    • 1
  • Melanie A. Price
    • 4
  • Sue Anne McLachlan
    • 1
    • 5
  • kConFab Investigators
    • 1
  • Geoffrey J. Lindeman
    • 6
  • Michael J. McKay
    • 7
  • Michael L. Friedlander
    • 8
  • John L. Hopper
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Hematology and Medical OncologyPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreVictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology, Griffith Taylor BuildingUniversity of SydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of MelbourneVictoriaAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Psychological MedicineRoyal North Shore HospitalSt. LeonardsAustralia
  5. 5.Department of Medical OncologySt. Vincent’s HospitalFitzroyAustralia
  6. 6.Department of Haematology and Medical OncologyRoyal Melbourne HospitalParkvilleAustralia
  7. 7.Divisions of Radiation Oncology and ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreVictoriaAustralia
  8. 8.Department of Medical OncologyPrince of Wales HospitalRandwickAustralia

Personalised recommendations