Tail fitting for truncated and non-truncated Pareto-type distributions
- 243 Downloads
In extreme value analysis, natural upper bounds can appear that truncate the probability tail. At other instances ultimately at the largest data, deviations from a Pareto tail behaviour become apparent. This matter is especially important when extrapolation outside the sample is required. Given that in practice one does not always know whether the distribution is truncated or not, we consider estimators for extreme quantiles both under truncated and non-truncated Pareto-type distributions. We make use of the estimator of the tail index for the truncated Pareto distribution first proposed in Aban et al. (J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 101(473), 270–277, 2006). We also propose a truncated Pareto QQ-plot and a formal test for truncation in order to help deciding between a truncated and a non-truncated case. In this way we enlarge the possibilities of extreme value modelling using Pareto tails, offering an alternative scenario by adding a truncation point T that is large with respect to the available data. In the mathematical modelling we hence let T→∞ at different speeds compared to the limiting fraction (k/n→0) of data used in the extreme value estimation. This work is motivated using practical examples from different fields, simulation results, and some asymptotic results.
KeywordsPareto-type distributions Truncation Extreme quantiles Endpoint QQ-plots
AMS 2000 Subject Classifications62G32 62G05 62G10 62G20
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Clark, D.R.: A note on the upper-truncated Pareto distribution In Proc. of the Enterprise Risk Management Symposium, April 22-24, Chicago IL (2013)Google Scholar
- Mason, D.M., Turova, T.S.: Weak Convergence of the Hill Estimator Process. In: Galambos, J., Lechner, J., Simiu, E. (eds.) Extreme Value Theory and Applications: Proceedings of the Conference on Extreme Value Theory and Applications, Gaithersburg, 1993, vol. 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)Google Scholar
- Nuyts, J.: Inference about the tail of a distribution: improvement on the Hill estimator. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 924013 (2010)Google Scholar