, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 375–397 | Cite as

Asymptotic models and inference for extremes of spatio-temporal data

  • Kamil Feridun Turkman
  • M. A. Amaral Turkman
  • J. M. Pereira


Recently there has been a lot of effort to model extremes of spatially dependent data. These efforts seem to be divided into two distinct groups: the study of max-stable processes, together with the development of statistical models within this framework; the use of more pragmatic, flexible models using Bayesian hierarchical models (BHM) and simulation based inference techniques. Each modeling strategy has its strong and weak points. While max-stable models capture the local behavior of spatial extremes correctly, hierarchical models based on the conditional independence assumption, lack the asymptotic arguments the max-stable models enjoy. On the other hand, they are very flexible in allowing the introduction of physical plausibility into the model. When the objective of the data analysis is to estimate return levels or kriging of extreme values in space, capturing the correct dependence structure between the extremes is crucial and max-stable processes are better suited for these purposes. However when the primary interest is to explain the sources of variation in extreme events Bayesian hierarchical modeling is a very flexible tool due to the ease with which random effects are incorporated in the model. In this paper we model a data set on Portuguese wildfires to show the flexibility of BHM in incorporating spatial dependencies acting at different resolutions.


Bayesian hierarchical models Generalized Pareto distribution Wildfires 

AMS 2000 Subject Classifications

60G70 62F15 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albin, P.: On extremal theory for non differentiable stationary processes. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund (1987)Google Scholar
  2. Albin, P.: On extremal theory for stationary processes. Ann. Probab. 18, 92–128 (1990)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee, S., Carlin, B.P., Gelfand, A.: Hierarchical Modelling and Analysis for Spatial Data. Chapman and Hall (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Buishand, A., de Haan, L., Zhou, C.: On spatial extremes: with application to a rainfall problem. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2, 624–642 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Castellanos, M.E., Cabras, S.: A default Bayesian procedure for the generalized Pareto distribution. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 137, 473–483 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Chavez-Demoulin, V., Davison, A.: Generalized additive modelling of sample extremes. Appl. Stat. 54, 207–222 (2005)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Cocchi, D., Greco, F., Trivisano, C.: Hierarchical space-time modelling of PM 10 pollution. Atmos. Environ. 41, 532–542 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coles, S.: An Introduction to Statistical Modelling of Extreme Values. Springer, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Coles, S., Tawn, J.: Modelling extremes of the areal rainfall process. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 58, 329–347 (1996)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooley, D., Naveau, P., Joneli, V., Rababtel, A., Grancher, D.: A Bayesian hierarchical extreme value model for lichenometry. Environmetrics 17, 555–574 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooley, D., Nychka, D., Naveau, P.: Bayesian spatial model of extreme precipitation return levels. JASA 102, 824–840 (2007)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. de Haan, L., Ferreira, A.: Extreme Value Theory, An Introduction. Springer, New York (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. de Haan, L., Pereira, T.: Spatial extremes: models for the stationary case. Ann. Stat. 34, 146–168 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Zea Bermudez, P., Mendes, J., Pereira, J.M.C., Turkman, K.F., Vasconcelos, M.J.P.: Spatial and temporal extremes of wildfire sizes in Portugal (1984–2004). Int. J. Wildland Fire (2009, in press)Google Scholar
  15. Fawcett, L., Walshaw, D.: A hierarchical model for extreme wind speeds. Appl. Stat. 55, 631–646 (2006)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Fougères, A.L., Nolan, J.P., Rootzén, H.: Models for dependent extremes using stable mixtures. Scand. J. Statist. 36, 42–59 (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Gelman, A., Pardoe, I.: Bayesian measures of explained variance and pooling in multilevel models. Technometrics 40, 241–251 (2005)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Heffernan, J.E., Tawn, J.: A conditional approach for multivariate extreme values. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 66, 497–546 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Kabluchko, Z., Schlather, M., de Haan, L.: Stationary Max-stable fields associated to negative definite functions. Ann. Probab. (2009)
  20. Leadbetter, M.R., Lindgren, G., Rootzén, H.: Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes. Springer, New York (1983)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Lunn, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N., Spiegelhalter, D.: WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 10, 325–337 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mendes J.M., de Zea Bermudez P., Pereira J.M.C., Turkman K.F., Vasconcelos, M.J.P.: Spatial extremes of wildfire sizes: Bayesian hierarchical models for extremes. Environ. Ecol. Stat. doi: 10.1007/s10651-008-0099-3 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. Padoan, S.A., Ribatet, M., Sisson, S.A.: Likelihood-based inference for max-stable processes. JASA (Theory and Methods) (2009, submitted)Google Scholar
  24. Piterbarg, V.: Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Gaussian Processes and Fields. AMS Monographs (1996)Google Scholar
  25. Reed, W.J., McKelvey, K.S.: Power-law behaviour and parametric models for the size-distribution of forest fires. Ecol. Model. 150, 239–254 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ribatet, M.: A User’s Guide to the SpatialExtremes Package. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
  27. Sang, H.: Extreme value modeling for space-time data with meteorological applications. Ph.D. thesis, Duke University (2008)Google Scholar
  28. Schlather, M.: Models for stationary max-stable random fields. Extremes 5, 33–44 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomas, A., Best, N., Lunn, D., Arnold, R., Spiegelhalter, D.: GeoBUGS User Manual Version 1.2 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamil Feridun Turkman
    • 1
  • M. A. Amaral Turkman
    • 1
  • J. M. Pereira
    • 2
  1. 1.CEAUL and DEIO, FCULUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.ISA Technical University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations