Advertisement

Experimental Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 441–476 | Cite as

The aggregate impacts of tournament incentives in experimental asset markets

  • Debapriya Jojo PaulEmail author
  • Julia Henker
  • Sian Owen
Original Paper
  • 227 Downloads

Abstract

We examine how rewards and penalties under tournament incentives impact price behaviour in experimental asset markets. Adding a penalty to a reward-only contract, or a reward to a penalty-only contract, changes the traders’ behaviour. The experimental markets with adjusted contracts experience less trading, but longer-lived and larger bubbles. This observed effect of penalties is consistent with herd-driven behaviour under relative performance evaluation, while the effect of rewards reflects the influence of the convexity of bonuses. However, these effects dissipate with trader experience. Our findings contribute to the debate attributing market instability to incentive structures in the finance industry.

Keywords

Tournaments Relative performance evaluation Bubbles Experimental asset market Convex incentives Herding 

JEL Classification

C92 G12 J33 M52 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees and Charles Noursair (the editor) for suggestions. We also thank David Feldman, Thomas Henker, Jeremy Clark, Kenan Kalayci and session participants at the 2015 Experimental Finance Meeting, the 2015 European Financial Management Association meeting, and the UNSW brown bag and seminar participants at the University of Maine and the University of Tasmania for helpful comments. We gratefully acknowledge financial support provided by the Australian Research Council (ARC DECRA Grant Number: DE120101523).

Supplementary material

10683_2018_9562_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 2232 kb)
10683_2018_9562_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (2.2 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 2220 kb)
10683_2018_9562_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (3.8 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 3932 kb)
10683_2018_9562_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (136 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 136 kb)

References

  1. Acker, D., & Duck, N. W. (2006). A tournament model of fund management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9–10), 1460–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackert, L. F., Charupat, N., Church, B. K., & Deaves, R. (2006). Margin, short selling, and lotteries in experimental asset markets. Southern Economic Journal, 73(2), 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ackert, L. F., & Church, B. K. (2001). The effects of subject pool and design experience on rationality in experimental asset markets. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(1), 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, F., & Gorton, G. (1993). Churning bubbles. Review of Economic Studies, 60(4), 813–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial contagion. The Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2000). Chasing hot funds: The effects of relative performance on portfolio choice. Financial Management, 29(3), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bebchuk, L. A., & Spamann, H. (2009). Regulating bankers’ pay. Georgetown Law Journal, 98, 247.Google Scholar
  8. Blais, A.-R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33.Google Scholar
  9. Blinder, A. S. (2009). Crazy compensation and the crisis. The Wall Street Journal, http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124346974150760597. Accessed 16 January 2015.
  10. Brown, K. C., Harlow, W. V., & Starks, L. T. (1996). Of tournaments and temptations: An analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Busse, J. A. (2001). Another look at mutual fund tournaments. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabral, L. M. B. (2003). R&D competition when firms choose variance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(1), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caginalp, G., Porter, D., & Smith, V. L. (1998). Initial cash/asset ratio and asset prices: An experimental study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(2), 756–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caginalp, G., Porter, D., & Smith, V. L. (2000). Overreactions, momentum, liquidity, and price bubbles in laboratory and field asset markets. Journal of Psychology & Financial Markets, 1(1), 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caginalp, G., Porter, D., & Smith, V. L. (2001). Financial bubbles: Excess cash, momentum, and incomplete information. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(2), 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan, K. S., Lei, V., & Vesely, F. (2013). Differentiated assets: An experimental study on bubbles. Economic Inquiry, 51(3), 1731–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, H.-L., & Pennacchi, G. G. (2009). Does prior performance affect a mutual fund’s choice of risk? Theory and further empirical evidence. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(4), 745–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheung, S. L., & Coleman, A. (2014). Relative performance incentives and price bubbles in experimental asset markets. Southern Economic Journal, 81(2), 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1997). Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 105(6), 1167–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Childs, J., & Mestelman, S. (2006). Rate-of-return parity in experimental asset markets. Review of International Economics, 14(3), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dass, N., Massa, M., & Patgiri, R. (2008). Mutual funds and bubbles: The surprising role of contractual incentives. Review of Financial Studies, 21(1), 51–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dufwenberg, M., Lindqvist, T., & Moore, E. (2005). Bubbles and experience: An experiment. The American Economic Review, 95(5), 1731–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., & Blake, C. R. (2003). Incentive fees and mutual funds. The Journal of Finance, 58(2), 779–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Blake, C. R., Krasny, Y., & Ozelge, S. O. (2010). The effect of holdings data frequency on conclusions about mutual fund behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(5), 912–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher, E. O. N., & Kelly, F. S. (2000). Experimental foreign exchange markets. Pacific Economic Review, 5(3), 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaba, A., & Kalra, A. (1999). Risk behavior in response to quotas and contests. Marketing Science, 18(3), 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaba, A., Tsetlin, I., & Winkler, R. L. (2004). Modifying variability and correlations in winner-take-all contests. Operations Research, 52(3), 384–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gilpatric, S. M. (2009). Risk taking in contests and the role of carrots and sticks. Economic Inquiry, 47(2), 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goriaev, A., Nijman, T. E., & Werker, B. J. M. (2005). Yet another look at mutual fund tournaments. Journal of Empirical Finance, 12(1), 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haruvy, E., & Noussair, C. N. (2006). The effect of short selling on bubbles and crashes in experimental spot asset markets. The Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1119–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hu, P., Kale, J. R., Pagani, M., & Subramanian, A. (2011). Fund flows, performance, managerial career concerns, and risk taking. Management Science, 57(4), 628–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hvide, Hans K. (2002). Tournament rewards and risk taking. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), 877–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Isaac, R. M., & James, D. (2003). Boundaries of the tournament pricing effect in asset markets: Evidence from experimental markets. Southern Economic Journal, 69(4), 936–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. James, D., & Isaac, R. M. (2000). Asset markets: How they are affected by tournament incentives for individuals. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kempf, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2008). Tournaments in mutual-fund families. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 1013–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kempf, A., Ruenzi, S., & Thiele, T. (2009). Employment risk, compensation incentives, and managerial risk taking: Evidence from the mutual fund industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(1), 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King, R., Smith, V. L., Williams, A. W., & Boening, M. V. (1993). The robustness of bubbles and crashes in experimental stock markets. In R. Day & P. Chen (Eds.), Non linear dynamics and evolutionary economics (pp. 183–2999). Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kleinlercher, D., Huber, J., & Kirchler, M. (2014). The impact of different incentive schemes on asset prices. European Economic Review, 68, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koski, J. L., & Pontiff, J. (1999). How are derivatives used? Evidence from the mutual fund industry. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 791–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lugovskyy, V., Puzzello, D., & Tucker, S. J. (2010). An experimental investigation of overdissipation in the all pay auction. European Economic Review, 54(8), 974–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nieken, P., & Sliwka, D. (2010). Risk-taking tournaments—Theory and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noussair, C. N., & Powell, O. (2010). Peaks and valleys: Price discovery in experimental asset markets with non-monotonic fundamentals. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(2), 152–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2001). Price bubbles in laboratory asset markets with constant fundamental values. Experimental Economics, 4(1), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Palan, Stefan. (2013). A review of bubbles and crashes in experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 570–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Porter, D. P., & Smith, V. L. (1995). Futures contracting and dividend uncertainty in experimental asset markets. Journal of Business, 68(4), 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Powell, O. (2016). Numeraire independence and the measurement of mispricing in experimental asset markets. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Qiu, J. (2003). Termination risk, multiple managers and mutual fund tournaments. European Finance Review, 7(2), 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rajan, R. G. (2006). Has finance made the world riskier? European Financial Management, 12(4), 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rajan, R. G. (2008). Bankers’ pay is deeply flawed. Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/18895dea-be06-11dc-8bc9-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz3T9uTJuUR. Accessed 16 January 2015.
  54. Robin, S., Straznicka, K., & Villeval, M. (2012). Bubbles and incentives: An experiment on asset markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2197754.
  55. Schoenberg, E. J., & Haruvy, E. (2012). Relative performance information in asset markets: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(6), 1143–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, V. L., Suchanek, G. L., & Williams, A. W. (1988). Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica, 56(5), 1119–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, V. L., van Boening, M., & Wellford, C. P. (2000). Dividend timing and behavior in laboratory asset markets. Economic Theory, 16(3), 567–583.Google Scholar
  58. Taylor, J. (2003). Risk-taking behavior in mutual fund tournaments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50(3), 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsetlin, I., Gaba, A., & Winkler, R. (2004). Strategic choice of variability in multiround contests and contests with handicaps. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29(2), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wagner, W. (2013). Performance evaluation and financial market runs. Review of Finance, 17(2), 597–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Faculty of BusinessBond UniversityRobinaAustralia
  3. 3.Performance Audit TeamAudit Office of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations