Experimental Economics

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 281–298 | Cite as

Intertemporal consumption and debt aversion: an experimental study

  • Thomas MeissnerEmail author
Original Paper


This paper tests how subjects behave in an intertemporal consumption/saving experiment when borrowing is allowed and whether subjects treat debt differently than savings. Two treatments create environments where either saving or borrowing is required for optimal consumption. Since both treatments share the same optimal consumption levels, observed consumption choices can be directly compared across treatments. The experimental findings imply that deviations from optimal behavior are higher when subjects have to borrow than when they have to save in order to consume optimally, suggesting debt aversion. Signifiant under-consumption is observed when subjects have to borrow in order to reach optimal consumption. In line with previous experiments, weak evidence is found suggesting that subjects over-consume when saving is necessary for optimal consumption.


Laboratory experiment Intertemporal consumption Consumption smoothing Debt aversion 

JEL Classification

C91 D91 E21 



I am grateful for valuable comments by Frank Heinemann, Dorothea Kübler, Dietmar Fehr and participants of the Berlin Behavioral Economics Colloquium and the Barcelona GSE Summer Forum Workshop on Theoretical and Experimental Macroeconomics. I also thank Satpal Nijjar for help with programming the experimental software. Financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through CRC 649 “Economic Risk” is gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

10683_2015_9437_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (197 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 198 KB)


  1. Ballinger, T. P., Palumbo, M. G., & Wilcox, N. T. (2003). Precautionary saving and social learning across generations: An experiment. The Economic Journal, 113(490), 920–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballinger, T. P., Hudson, E., Karkoviata, L., & Wilcox, N. T. (2011). Saving behavior and cognitive abilities. Experimental Economics, 14(3), 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A. L., Chua, Z. E., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). Learning and visceral temptation in dynamic saving experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 197–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caballero, R. J. (1990). Consumption puzzles and precautionary savings. Journal of Monetary Economics, 25(1), 113–136.Google Scholar
  5. Caballero, R. J. (1991). Earnings uncertainty and aggregate wealth accumulation. The American Economic Review, 81, 859–871.Google Scholar
  6. Caetano, G., Palacios, M., & Patrinos, H. (2011). Measuring aversion to debt: An experiment among student loan candidates. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  7. Carbone, E. (2006). Understanding intertemporal choices. Applied Economics, 38(8), 889–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carbone, E., & Duffy, J. (2013). Lifecycle consumption plans, social learning and external habits: Experimental evidence. Working paper.Google Scholar
  9. Carbone, E., & Hey, J. D. (2004). The effect of unemployment on consumption: An experimental analysis. The Economic Journal, 114(497), 660–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duffy, J. (2012). Macroeconomics: A survey of laboratory research. Handbook of Experimental Economics 2.Google Scholar
  11. Eckel, C. C., Johnson, C., Montmarquette, C., & Rojas, C. (2007). Debt aversion and the demand for loans for postsecondary education. Public Finance Review, 35(2), 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fenig, G., Mileva, M., & Petersen, L. (2013). Asset trading and monetary policy in production economies. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  13. Field, E. (2009). Educational debt burden and career choice: Evidence from a financial aid experiment at NYU law school. American Economic Journal, 1(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  14. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hey, J. D., & Dardanoni, V. (1998). Optimal consumption under uncertainty: An experimental investigation. The Economic Journal, 98(390), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lei, V., & Noussair, C. N. (2002). An experimental test of an optimal growth model. The American Economic Review, 92(3), 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meissner, T., & Rostam-Afschar, D. (2014). Do tax cuts increase consumption? An experimental test of Ricardian Equivalence. Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics Discussion Paper 2014/16.Google Scholar
  18. Noussair, C., & Matheny, K. (2000). An experimental study of decisions in dynamic optimization problems. Economic Theory, 15(2), 389–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Berlin University of TechnologyBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Grenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations