Why real leisure really matters: incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory
On-the-job leisure is a pervasive feature of the modern workplace. We studied its impact on work performance in a laboratory experiment by either allowing or restricting Internet access. We used a 2 × 2 experimental design in which subjects completing real-effort work tasks could earn cash according to either individual- or team-production incentive schemes. Under team pay, production levels were significantly lower when Internet browsing was available than when it was not. Under individual pay, however, no differences in production levels were observed between the treatment in which Internet was available and the treatment in which it was not. In line with standard incentive theory, individual pay outperformed team pay across all periods of the experiment when Internet browsing was available. This was not the case, however, when Internet browsing was unavailable. These results demonstrate that the integration of on-the-job leisure activities into an experimental labor design is crucial for uncovering incentive effects.
KeywordsIncentive Free riding Internet access Experimental method
JEL ClassificationC92 D23 M52
- Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.Google Scholar
- Bolton, P., & Dewatripont, M. (2005). Contract Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press Books.Google Scholar
- Charness, G., & Kuhn, V. (2011). Lab labor: What can labor economists learn from the lab?. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (chap. 03, pp. 229–330). Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Charness, G., Masclet, D. & Villeval, M. C. (2010). Competitive preferences and status as an incentive: Experimental evidence. IZA Discussion Paper 5034, Bonn, and GATE WP 10–16.Google Scholar
- Chase, W. G., & Ericsson, K. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 1–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Corgnet, B., Hernan-Gonzalez, R., & Rassenti, S. (2011). Real effort, real leisure and real-time. Supervision: Incentives and peer pressure in virtual organizations. Working Papers 11-05, Chapman University Economic Science Institute.Google Scholar
- Jones, S., Johnson-Yale, C., Millermaier, C., & Perez, F. S. (2009). Everyday life, online: U.S. college students’ use of the Internet. First Monday, 14(10).Google Scholar
- Laffont, J. J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The Theory of incentives: The principal-agent model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
- Malachowski, D. (2005). Wasted time at work costing companies billions. San Francisco Chronicle, July 11, 2005, http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2005/07/11/wastingtime.TMP.
- Nalbantian, H., & Schotter, A. (1997). Productivity under group incentives: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 87(3), 314–341.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. (2013). Smartphone ownership update. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Smartphone-Ownership-2013.aspx. Accessed 6th June 2013.
- Young, K. S. (2005). Internet addiction prevention and education: Preventive education training can reduce problematic Internet use in the workplace and help employers create a work environment that encourages identification and treatment of addictive online behaviors. The Journal of Employee Assistance, 15(3), 15–19.Google Scholar
- Young, K. S. (2006). The Internet and workplace transformation. Advances in Management Information Systems, 7, 193–204.Google Scholar