Experimental Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 414–420

The effects of the take-option in dictator-game experiments: a comment on Engel’s (2011) meta-study

Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we report a replication of Engel’s (Exp. Econ. 14(4):583–610, 2011) meta-study of dictator game experiments. We find Engel’s meta-study of dictator game experiments to be robust, with one important exception: the coding of the take-option (List in J. Polit. Econ. 115(3):482–493, 2007; Bardsley in Exp. Econ. 11(2):122–133, 2008; Cappelen et al. in Econ. Lett. 118(2):280–283, 2013). While Engel reports this as having no statistically significant effect, in our replications, we find an economically and statistically significant negative effect on giving in line with the relevant literature.

Keywords

Dictator game experiments Meta-analysis Giving Normalized giving Take-option 

JEL Classification

C24 C91 D03 

References

  1. Bardsley, N. (2008). Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? Experimental Economics, 11(2), 122–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekkers, R. (2007). Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: the all-or-nothing dictator game. [Altruism, dictator game, field experiments]. Survey Research Methods, 1(3), 139–144. Google Scholar
  3. Brosig, J., Riechmann, T., & Weimann, J. (2007). In selfish in the end?: An investigation of consistency and stability of individual behavior. MPRA Paper (2035). http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/2035.html.
  4. Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  5. Cappelen, A. W., Nielsen, U. H., Sørensen, E. Ø., Tungodden, B., & Tyran, J.-R. (2013). Give and take in dictator games. Economics Letters, 118(2), 280–283. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., & Shogren, J. F. (2002). Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218–1221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewald, W. G., Thursby, J. G., & Anderson, R. G. (1986). Replication in empirical economics. The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 587–603. Google Scholar
  8. Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., & Rand, D. (2013). Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games. Experimental Economics, 16(3), 349–371. doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9341-9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eichenberger, R., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1998). Rational moralists: the role of fairness in democratic economic politics. Public Choice, 94(1/2), 191–210. doi:10.2307/30024332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: a meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guala, F., & Mittone, L. (2010). Paradigmatic experiments: the dictator game. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(5), 578–584. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heinrich, T., Riechmann, T., & Weimann, J. (2009). Game or frame? Incentives in modified dictator games. FEMM Working Papers (09008). http://ideas.repec.org/p/mag/wpaper/09008.html.
  13. Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 248–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 653–660. Google Scholar
  15. List, J. A. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115(3), 482–493. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mikula, G. (1973). Gewinnaufteilungsverhalten in Dyaden bei variiertem Leistungsverhältnis. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 3, 126–133. Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, L., & Ortmann, A. (2012a). On the interpretation of giving, taking, and destruction in dictator games and joy-of-destruction games. UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper, No. 2012-50. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2190240.
  18. Zhang, L., & Ortmann, A. (2012b). A reproduction and replication of Engel’s meta-study of dictator game experiments. UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper, No. 2012-44. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2171064.

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNSWSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations