Advertisement

Experimental Economics

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 510–529 | Cite as

The visible hand: finger ratio (2D:4D) and competitive bidding

  • Matthew Pearson
  • Burkhard C. SchipperEmail author
Article

Abstract

In an experiment using two-bidder first-price sealed bid auctions with symmetric independent private values and 400 subjects, we scan also the right hand of each subject. We study how the ratio of the length of the index and ring fingers (2D:4D) of the right hand, a measure of prenatal hormone exposure, is correlated with bidding behavior and total profits. 2D:4D has been reported to predict competitiveness in sports competition (Manning and Taylor in Evol. Hum. Behav. 22:61–69, 2001, and Hönekopp et al. in Horm. Behav. 49:545–549, 2006), risk aversion in lottery tasks (Dreber and Hoffman in Portfolio selection in utero. Stockholm School of Economics, 2007; Garbarino et al. in J. Risk Uncertain. 42:1–26, 2011), and the average profitability of high-frequency traders in financial markets (Coates et al. in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:623–628, 2009). We do not find any significant correlation between 2D:4D on either bidding or profits. However, there might be racial differences in the correlation between 2D:4D and bidding and profits.

Keywords

Hormones Digit ratio 2D:4D Risk behavior Competition Competitive behavior Auctions Bidding Endocrinological economics 

JEL Classification

C72 C91 C92 D44 D81 D87 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor, Jordi Brandts, and two anonymous referees for very helpful comments. We thank Yan Chen for providing us the z-tree programs of her experiment. Financial support by the Institute of Governmental Affairs, UC Davis, and the UC Davis Hellman Fellowship is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Coren Apicella, Nicole Baran, Giacomo Bonanno, Anna Dreber, Doug Miller, and participants in the 2009 Workshop on Neuroeconomics and Endocrinological Economics at UC Davis. Moreover, we thank Gabriel Mathy, Wen Yong Tang, and Nick Zolas for excellent research assistance.

Supplementary material

10683_2011_9311_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (145 kb)
(PDF 138 kB)

References

  1. Archer, J. (1991). The influence of testosterone on human aggression. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 1–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Campbell, B., Gray, P. B., Hoffman, M., & Little, A. C. (2008). Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 384–390. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, A. A., & Hurd, P. L. (2005). Finger length ratio (2D:4D) correlates with physical aggression in men but not women. Biological Psychology, 68, 215–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benderlioglu, Z., & Nelson, R. J. (2004). Digit length ratios predict reactive aggression in women, but not in men. Hormones and Behavior, 46, 558–564. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, F., & Kahn, L. (2000). Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 75–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brañas Garza, P., & Rustichini, A. (2011). Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: Not just risk taking. University of Minnesota. Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, C., Gelbach, J., & Miller, D. (2008). Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 414–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casari, M., Ham, J., & Kagel, J. (2007). Selection bias, demographic effects and ability effects in common value auction experiments. American Economic Review, 97, 1278–1304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Case, A., & Paxson, C. (2008). Stature and status: Height, ability, and labor market outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 499–532. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2009). Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk taking. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 809–842. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Y., Katuscak, P., & Ozdenoren, E. (2007). Sealed bid auctions with ambiguity: Theory and experiments. Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 513–535. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, Y., Katuscak, P., & Ozdenoren, E. (2009). Why can’t a woman bid more like a man? University of Michigan. Google Scholar
  13. Coates, J. M., Gurnell, M., & Rustichini, A. (2009). Second-to-fourth digit ratio predict success among high-frequency financial traders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 623–628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, J. C., Smith, V. L., & Walker, J. M. (1988). Theory and individual behavior in first-price auctions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 61–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreber, A., & Hoffman, M. (2007). Portfolio selection in utero. Stockholm School of Economics. Google Scholar
  16. Dreber, A., Apicella, C. L., Eisenberg, D. T. A., Garcia, J. R., Zamoree, R. S., Lume, J. K., & Campbell, B. (2009). The 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D 4 gene (DRD4) is associated with financial risk taking in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 85–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filiz, E., & Ozbay, E. (2007). Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. American Economic Review, 97, 1407–1418. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garbarino, E., Slonim, R., & Sydnor, J. (2011). Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42, 1–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In K. Kremer & V. Macho (Eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63 (pp. 79–93). Göttingen: Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung. Google Scholar
  21. Ham, J., & Kagel, J. (2006). Gender effects in private value auctions. Economics Letters, 92, 375–382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1994). Beauty and labor market. American Economic Review, 84, 1174–1194. Google Scholar
  23. Hönekopp, J., Manning, J. T., & Müller, C. (2006). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and physical fitness in males and females: Evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 545–549. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hönekopp, J., Bartholdt, L., Beier, L., & Liebert, A. (2007). Second to fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D) and adult sex hormone levels: New data and a meta-analytical review. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 313–321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kagel, J. H. (1995). Auctions: A survey of experimental research. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 501–585). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chap. 7. Google Scholar
  26. Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673–676. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krishna, V. (2002). Auction theory. San Diego: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  28. Loo, J. M. Y., Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2008). Gambling among the Chinese: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychological Review, 28, 1152–1166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lutchmaya, S., Raggatt, P., Knickmeyer, R., & Manning, J. T. (2004). 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Human Development, 77, 23–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio. A pioneer to fertility, behavior and health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar
  31. Manning, J. T., & Fink, B. (2008). Digit ratio (2D:4D), dominance, reproductive success, asymmetry, and sociosexuality in the BBC Internet study. American Journal of Human Biology, 20, 451–461. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manning, J. T., & Taylor, R. P. (2001). Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: Implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 61–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, lutenizing hormones and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 13, 3000–3004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manning, J. T., Barley, L., Lewis-Jones, I., Walton, J., Trivers, R. L., Thornhill, R., Singh, D., Rhode, P., Bereckzei, T., Henzi, P., Soler, M., & Sved, A. (2002). The 2nd to 4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 163–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manning, J. T., Henzi, P., & Venkatramana, P. (2003). 2nd to 4th digit ratio: ethnic differences and family size in English, Indian and South African populations. Annals of Human Biology, 30, 579–588. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manning, J. T., Stewart, A., Bundred, P. E., & Trivers, R. L. (2004). Sex and ethnic differences in 2nd to 4th digit ratio of children. Early Human Development, 80, 161–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McIntyre, M. H., Barrett, E. S., McDermott, R., Johnson, D. D. P., Cowden, J., & Rosen, S. P. (2007a). Finger length ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in aggression during a simulated war game. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 755–764. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McIntyre, M. H., Chapman, J. F., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. R. (2007b). Index-to-ring finger length ratio (2D:4D) predicts levels of salivary estradiol, but not progesterone, over the menstrual cycle. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 434–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2006). Second to fourth digit ratio and cooperative behavior. Biological Psychology, 71, 111–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morgan, J., Steiglitz, K., & Reis, G. (2003). The spite motive and equilibrium behavior in auctions, contributions to economic analysis & Policy 2, Article 5. Google Scholar
  42. Paul, S. N., Bernet, S. K., Cherkas, L. F., Andrew, T., & Spector, T. D. (2006). Heritability of the second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D): A twin study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 215–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pearson, M., & Schipper, B. C. (2011). Menstrual cycle and competitive bidding. University of California, Davis. Google Scholar
  44. Sanchez-Pages, S., & Turiegano, E. (2010). Testosterone, facial symmetry and cooperation in the prisoners’ dilemma. Psychology & Behavior, 99, 355–361. Google Scholar
  45. Sanders, G., Bereczkei, T., Csatho, A., & Manning, J. T. (2005). The ratio of the 2(nd) ro 4(th) finger length predicts spatial ability in men but not in women. Cortex, 41, 789–795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15268–15273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schipper, B. (2011a). Sex hormones and competitive bidding. University of California, Davis. Google Scholar
  48. Schipper, B. (2011b). Sex hormones and choice under risk. University of California, Davis. Google Scholar
  49. Van den Bergh, B., & Dewitte, S. (2006). Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men’s decisions in ultimatum games. Proceeding of the Royal Society B, 273, 2091–2095. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zak, P., Kurzban, R., & Matzner, W. T. (2005). Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 522–527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zak, P., Kurzban, R., Ahmadi, S., Swerdloff, R. S., Park, J., Efremidze, L., Redwine, K., Morgan, K., & Matzner, M. (2009). Testosterone administration decreases generosity in the ultimatum game. PLoS ONE, 4(e8330), 1–7. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations