Two heads are less bubbly than one: team decision-making in an experimental asset market
In the world of mutual funds management, responsibility for investment decisions is increasingly entrusted to small teams instead of individuals. Yet the effect of team decision-making in a market environment has never been studied in a controlled experiment. In this paper, we investigate the effect of team decision-making in an asset market experiment that has long been known to reliably generate price bubbles and crashes in markets populated by individuals. We find that this tendency is substantially reduced when each decision-making unit is instead a team of two. This holds across a broad spectrum of measures of the severity of mispricing, both under a continuous double-auction institution and in a call market. The result is not driven by reduced turnover due to time required for deliberation by teams, and continues to hold even when subjects are experienced. Our result also holds not only when our teams treatments are compared to the ‘narrow’ baseline provided by the corresponding individuals treatments, but also when compared more broadly to the results of the large body of previous research on markets of this kind.
KeywordsGroup decision-making Price bubbles Asset market experiments
JEL ClassificationC92 D70 G12
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baker, R. J. I., Laury, S. K., & Williams, A. W. (2008). Comparing small-group and individual behavior in lottery-choice experiments. Southern Economic Journal, 75(2), 367–382. Google Scholar
- Bär, M., Ciccotello, C. S., & Ruenzi, S. (2010). Risk management and team-managed mutual funds. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 4(1), 57–73. Google Scholar
- Casari, M., Zhang, J., & Jackson, C. (2010). Do groups fall prey to the winner’s curse? Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich. Google Scholar
- Davies, T. (2006). Irrational gloominess in the laboratory. University of Arizona. Google Scholar
- Haruvy, E. E., Noussair, C. N., & Powell, O. (2009). The impact of asset repurchases and issues in an experimental market. Tilburg University. Google Scholar
- Kachelmeier, S. J., & Shehata, M. (1992). Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People’s Republic of China. American Economic Review, 82(5), 1120–1141. Google Scholar
- King, R. R., Smith, V. L., Williams, A. W., & Boening, M. V. (1993). The robustness of bubbles and crashes in experimental markets. In R. H. Day & P. Chen (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics and evolutionary economics (pp. 183–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Samuelson, W. F., & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). The winner’s curse in bilateral negotiations. In V. L. Smith (Ed.), Research in Experimental Economics (Vol. 3). Greenwich: JAI Press. Google Scholar
- Smith, V. L., van Boening, M. V., & Wellford, C. P. (2000). Dividend timing and behavior in laboratory asset markets. Economic Theory, 16(3), 567–583. Google Scholar