Decomposing desert and tangibility effects in a charitable giving experiment
Several papers have documented that when subjects play with standard laboratory “endowments” they make less self-interested choices than when they use money they have either earned through a laboratory task or brought from outside the lab. In the context of a charitable giving experiment we decompose this into two common artifacts of the laboratory: the intangibility of money (or experimental currency units) promised on a computer screen relative to cash in hand, and the distinct treatment of random “windfall” gains relative to earned money. While both effects are found to be significant in non-parametric tests, the former effect, which has been neglected in previous studies, has a stronger impact on total donations, while the latter effect has a greater impact on the probability of donating. These results have clear implications for experimental design, and also suggest that the availability of more abstract payment methods may increase other-regarding behavior in the field.
KeywordsHouse money effect Experimental methodology Tangibility Public goods Charitable giving Individual choice Altruism
JEL ClassificationC91 D03 D64
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Breman, A. (2006). Give more tomorrow: evidence from a randomized field experiment. Unpublished manuscript. Google Scholar
- Carlsson, F., He, H., & Martinsson, P. (2009). Easy come, easy go—the role of windfall money in lab and field experiments (Working Papers in Economics 374). Google Scholar
- Cookson, R. (2000). Framing effects in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics, 3(1), 55–79. Google Scholar
- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review, 86, 653–660. Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1991). Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. Google Scholar
- Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Mittone, L., & Ploner, M. (2006). Is it just legitimacy of endowments? an experimental analysis of unilateral giving (CEEL Working Paper N. 02/2006). Google Scholar
- Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Eichenberger, R. (1999). Focus effects in dictator game experiments. Google Scholar
- Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Eichenberger, R. (2004). Fairness in extended dictator game experiments. Manuscript. Google Scholar
- Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281–1302. Google Scholar