Dictator games: a meta study
- First Online:
- 4.7k Downloads
Over the last 25 years, more than a hundred dictator game experiments have been published. This meta study summarises the evidence. Exploiting the fact that most experiments had to fix parameters they did not intend to test, in multiple regression the meta study is able to assess the effect of single manipulations, controlling for a host of alternative explanatory factors. The resulting rich dataset also provides a testbed for comparing alternative specifications of the statistical model for analysing dictator game data. It shows how Tobit models (assuming that dictators would even want to take money) and hurdle models (assuming that the decision to give a positive amount is separate from the choice of amount, conditional on giving) provide additional insights.
KeywordsDictator game Meta-study Multiple regression Tobit Hurdle model
JEL ClassificationC24 C91 D03
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blackwell, C. (2007). A meta-analysis of tax compliance experiments. http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ISP_CONFERENCES_TAX_COMPLIANCE_AND_EVASION_BLACKWELL.pdf.
- Brosig, J., Riechmann, T., & Weimann, J. (2007). Selfish in the end? An investigation of consistency and stability of individual behavior. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2035/1/MPRA_paper_2035.pdf.
- Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory. Experiments in strategic interaction. New York: Sage. Google Scholar
- Croson, R. T. A., & Marks, M. (2000). Step returns in threshold public goods. A meta- and experimental analysis. Experimental Economics, 2(3), 239–259. Google Scholar
- Frey, B., & Bohnet, I. (1995). Institutions affect fairness. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 151, 286–303. Google Scholar
- Goerg, S. J., & Kaiser, J. (2009). Non-parametric testing of distributions—the epps-singleton two-sample test using the empirical characteristic function. Stata Journal, 9, 454–465. Google Scholar
- Harbord, R. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2008). Meta-regression in stata. Stata Journal, 8, 493–519. Google Scholar
- Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Economic man’ in cross-cultural perspective. Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 795–815. Google Scholar
- Hopfensitz, A. (2009). Previous outcomes and reference dependence. A meta study of repeated investment tasks with and without restricted feedback. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16096/1/Hopfensitz_2009.pdf.
- Leider, S., Möbius, M. M., Rosenblat, T., & Quoc-Anh, D. (2009). What do we expect from our friends? https://mercury.smu.edu.sg/rsrchpubupload/15345/ExpectFriends.pdf.
- McDowell, A. (2003). From the help desk. Hurdle models. Stata Journal, 3, 178–184. Google Scholar
- Prante, T., Thacher, J. A., & Berrens, R. P. (2007). Evaluating Coasean bargaining experiments with meta-analysis. Economics Bulletin, 3(68), 1–7. Google Scholar
- Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
- Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung. Ernst Sauermann. Tübingen: Mohr: 136–168. Google Scholar