What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment
- 663 Downloads
This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general.
KeywordsExperimental economics Recruitment procedures Incentives Selection into experiments
- Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2000). Volunteers and pseudo-volunteers: The effect of recruitment method in dictator experiments. Experimental Economics, 3(2), 107–120. Google Scholar
- Greiner, B. (2004). The online recruitment system ORSEE 2.0—a guide for the organization of experiments in economics. University of Cologne, Working Paper Series in Economics, p. 10. Google Scholar
- Innocenti, A., & Pazienza, M. (2006). Altruism and gender in the trust game. Labsi Working Paper, 5. Google Scholar