Measuring altruism in a public goods experiment: a comparison of U.S. and Czech subjects
This paper compares contributions to an experimental public good across the United States and Czech Republic, using a design that allows us to distinguish between altruism and decision error. Czech subjects contribute significantly more than American subjects, and further analysis reveals that this result cannot be attributed to the confounding effects of gender or decision error. Instead, preferences for altruism appear to differ across groups: Czechs are more altruistic than Americans and men are more altruistic than women.
KeywordsPublic goods Experiment Czech Republic Nationality Gender
JEL ClassificationC92 H41
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., & Smith, A. M. (2005). An experimental examination of the volunteer’s dilemma. Working Paper. Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
- Ledyard, J. O. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
- Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068–1095. Google Scholar
- World Bank (2008). 2005 International comparison program: tables of final results. Washington: World Bank. Google Scholar