Advertisement

Experimental Economics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 87–92 | Cite as

Measuring conditional cooperation: a replication study in Russia

  • Benedikt HerrmannEmail author
  • Christian Thöni
Article

Abstract

We replicate the strategy-method experiment by Fischbacher et al. (Econ. Lett. 71:397–404, 2001) developed to measure attitudes towards cooperation in a one-shot public goods game. We collected data from 160 students at four different universities across urban and rural Russia. Using the classification proposed by Fischbacher et al. (2001) we find that the distribution of types is very similar across the four locations. The share of conditional cooperators in our Russian subject pools is comparable to the one found by Fischbacher et al. in a Swiss subject pool. However, the distribution of the other types differs from the one found in Switzerland.

Keywords

Conditional cooperation Replication Russia 

JEL Classification

H41 C91 C72 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10683_2008_9197_MOESM1_ESM.xls (77 kb)
DataObject

References

  1. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112, 419–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Croson, R. (2007). Theories of commitment, altruism and reciprocity: Evidence from linear public goods games. Economic Inquiry, 45, 199–216. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Durkheim, E. (1960). The division of labor in society (4th edn.). New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
  4. Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2006). Heterogeneous social preferences and the dynamics of free riding in public good. CeDEx Discussion Paper No. 2006-01, University of Nottingham. Google Scholar
  5. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71, 397–404. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gächter, S. (2007). Conditional cooperation. Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In B. S. Frey & A. Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and psychology. A promising new cross-disciplinary field. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  7. Gächter, S., & Thöni, C. (2005). Social learning and voluntary cooperation among like-minded people. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 303–314. Google Scholar
  8. Gächter, S., Herrmann, B., & Thöni, C. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in norm enforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 822–823. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keser, C., & van Winden, F. (2000). Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102, 23–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kocher, M. G., Cherry, T., Kroll, S., Netzer, R. J., & Sutter, M. (2007). Conditional cooperation on three continents. Working Papers, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck. Google Scholar
  11. Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 81, 1068–1095. Google Scholar
  12. Wirth, L. (1964). On cities and social life. In A. J. Reiss (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.University of St. Gallen, FEW-HSGSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations