Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered
While most papers on team decision-making find that teams behave more selfishly, less trustingly and less altruistically than individuals, Cason and Mui (1997) report that teams are more altruistic than individuals in a dictator game. Using a within-subjects design we re-examine group polarization by letting subjects make individual as well as team decisions in an experimental dictator game. In our experiment teams are more selfish than individuals, and the most selfish team member has the strongest influence on team decisions. Various explanations for the different findings in Cason and Mui (1997) and in our paper are discussed.
KeywordsExperiment Dictator game Team behavior Social preferences
JELC72 C91 C92 D70
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bornstein, G., & Yaniv, I. (1998). Individual and group behavior in the ultimatum game: are groups more ‘rational’ players? Experimental Economics, 1, 101–108. Google Scholar
- Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
- Cox, J. C. (2002). Trust, reciprocity, and other-regarding preferences: groups vs. individuals and males vs. females. In R. Zwick & A. Rapoport (Eds.), Advances in experimental business research (pp. 331–350). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar
- Gillet, J., Schram, A., & Sonnemans, J. (2007). The tragedy of the commons revisited: the importance of group decision-making (Working Paper). University of Amsterdam. Google Scholar
- Kahnemann, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76, 728–741. Google Scholar
- Kugler, T., Bornstein, G., Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2007, forthcoming). Trust between individuals and groups: groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy. Journal of Economic Psychology. Google Scholar
- Levine, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In G. Fisher & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, 4th edn., pp. 415–469). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Stoner, J. (1961). A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. Unpublished master thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston. Google Scholar
- Sutter, M., Kocher, M. G., & Strauß, S. (2006). Individuals and teams in UMTS-license auctions (Working Paper). University of Innsbruck. Google Scholar