Experimental Economics

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 187–192 | Cite as

“Behavioral experiments” in economics

  • Roberto A. WeberEmail author
  • Colin F. Camerer


American Economic Review Behavioral Research Behavioral Economic Public Good Game Dictator Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andreoni, J. (1995). Cooperation in Public Goods Experiments: kindness or confusion? American Economic Review, 85(4), 891–904Google Scholar
  2. Camerer, C., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). The introduction to the book Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, XLIII, 9–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding Social Preferences With Simple Tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, D. J., & Kagel, J. H. (2004). Learning and transfer in signaling games. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa Gomes, M., Crawford, V. P., & Bruno, B. (2001). Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study. Econometrica, 69, 1193–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Xi Kuang, J. (2006). Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  8. Devetag, G., & Warglien, M. (in press). Playing the wrong game: An experimental analysis of relational complexity and strategic misrepresentation. Games and Economic Behavior Google Scholar
  9. Engelmann, D., & Strobel, M. (2004). Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments. American Economic Review, 94(4), 857–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ericsson K. A., & Simon H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90, 980–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grether, D. M., & Plott, C. R. (1979). Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 623–638Google Scholar
  14. Grether, D. M. (1980). Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The representativeness heuristic. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96(3), 537–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. L. Preferences, Property Rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346–380Google Scholar
  16. Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C. F. (2005). Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human Decision-Making. Science, 310(5754), 1680–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, E. J., Colin, C., Sankar S., & Rymon, T. (2002). Detecting Failures of Backward Induction: monitoring Information Search in Sequential Bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory, 104(1), 16–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., & Fehr, E. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lazear, E. P., Malmendier, U., & Weber, R. A. (2006). Sorting in experiments with application to social preferences. NBER Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  20. Rubinstein, A. (2006). Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: A study of response times. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  21. Sanfey, A. G., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Cross-currents in Research on Decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sefton, M., Shupp, R., & Walker, J. (2002). The effect of rewards and sanctions in provision of public goods. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  23. Sutter, M. S. H., & Kocher, M. (2006). Choosing the stick or the carrot? Endogenous institutional choices in social dilemma situationsGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Huyck, J., Battalio, R., & Beil, R. (1990). Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty and coordination failure. The American Economic Review, 80, 234–248Google Scholar
  25. Weber, R. A. (2006). Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination in large groups. The American Economic Review, 96(1), 114–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weber, R. A., & Dawes, R. (2005). Behavioral economics. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (eds.) Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social & Decision SciencesCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh
  2. 2.Division of the Humanities and Social SciencesCalifornia Institute of Technology

Personalised recommendations