Intraspecific floral color variation as perceived by pollinators and non-pollinators: evidence for pollinator-imposed constraints?
Pollinator-mediated selection is expected to constrain floral color variation within plant populations, yet populations with high color variation (at least in human visual space) are common in nature. To explore this paradox, we collected floral reflectance spectra for 34 populations of 14 putatively bee-pollinated plant species of north-central New Mexico, USA, and translated them into three different animal visual spaces. We asked, (1) is intrapopulation variation in flower color constrained to be lower than the discrimination threshold of the putative dominant pollinators? And, (2) is perceived intrapopulation variation in flowers higher for non-pollinating animals than it is for the presumed dominant pollinator group? We found evidence consistent with some pollinator-imposed constraints on floral color in our species, with the majority (70.6%) of populations having > 95% of flower–flower or flower-centroid comparisons (where the centroid represents the mean phenotype) estimated to be visually indiscriminable to bees. We also found that perceived floral color variation was significantly greater for two non-pollinating groups—birds and humans—than for bees. Our results suggest that a large portion of human-perceived floral color variation within populations persists because it is effectively invisible to pollinators. In this scenario, human-perceived color may evolve neutrally (via drift) or via indirect selection on correlated characters such as herbivore- or drought-resistance, consistent with previous studies identifying non-pollinator agents of selection on flower color.
KeywordsPlant–pollinator interactions Signalling Reflectance spectra Bee vision Natural selection Color polymorphism
Thanks to Jennifer A. Rudgers, Diane L. Marshall, Mary C. “Cassie” Stoddard, and members of the Rudgers–Whitney lab group for helpful suggestions on the study and the manuscript. Funding was provided by the University of New Mexico Harry Wayne Springfield Fellowship (to K.C.P.), the Society for the Study of Evolution Rosemary Grant Award (to K.C.P.), and NSF DEB 1257965 (to K.D.W.). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- Buchmann SL (1985) Bees use vibration to aid pollen collection from non-poricidal flowers. J Kansas Entomol Soc 58:517–525Google Scholar
- Chittka L (1992) The colour hexagon: a chromaticity diagram based on photoreceptor excitations as a generalized representation of colour opponency. J Comp Physiol A 170:533–534Google Scholar
- Chittka L, Kevan PG (2005) Flower colors as advertisement. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband B (eds) Practical Pollination Biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge, Canada, pp 157–196Google Scholar
- Cockerell TDA (1906) The bees of New Mexico. Trans Am Entomol Soc 32:289–314Google Scholar
- Fry JD, Rausher MD (1997) Selection on a floral color polymorphism in the tall morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea): transmission success of the alleles through pollen. Evolution 51:66–78Google Scholar
- Garcia JE, Shrestha M, Dyer AG (2018) Flower signal variability overwhelms receptor-noise and requires plastic color learning in bees. Behav Ecol 29:1286–1297Google Scholar
- Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (2001) The effect of variation among floral traits on the flower constancy of pollinators. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–20Google Scholar
- Irwin RE, Strauss SY (2005) Flower color microevolution in wild radish: evolutionary response to pollinator-mediated selection. Am Nat 165:225–237Google Scholar
- Pendery BM, Rumbaugh MD (1993) Globemallows. Rangelands 15:127–130Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Rausher MD, Fry JD (1993) Effects of a locus affecting floral pigmentation in Ipomoea purpurea on female fitness components. Genetics 134:1237–1247Google Scholar
- Rozen JG Jr, Rozen BL (1986) Bionomics of crepuscular bees associated with the plant Psorothamnus scoparius (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). J New YorkEntomol S 94:472–479Google Scholar
- Wyszecki G, Stiles WS (2000) Color science: concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar