Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1105–1120 | Cite as

Female bias in the adult sex ratio of African annual fishes: interspecific differences, seasonal trends and environmental predictors

  • Martin Reichard
  • Matej Polačik
  • Radim Blažek
  • Milan Vrtílek
Original Paper

Abstract

Many populations have consistently biased adult sex ratios with important demographic and evolutionary consequences. However, geographical variation, the mechanisms, temporal dynamics and predictors of biased sex ratios are notoriously difficult to explain. We studied 334 wild populations of four species of African annual fish (Nothobranchius furzeri, N. kadleci, N. orthonotus, N. rachovii) across their ranges to compare their adult sex ratio, its seasonal dynamics, interpopulation variation and environmental predictors. Nothobranchius populations comprise a single age cohort and inhabit discrete isolated pools, with wide-ranging environmental conditions (habitat size, water turbidity, structural complexity, predators), making them ideal to study adult sex ratio variation. In captivity adult sex ratios were equal. In natural populations, adult sex ratios were biased 1:2 toward females in three study species while N. kadleci had sex ratios at unity. There was a decline in the proportion of males with age in one species, but not in the other species, implying most severe male mortality early after maturation, declining later perhaps with a decrease in male abundance. In general, the populations at vegetated sites had relatively more males than populations at sites with turbid water and little vegetation. Selective avian predation on brightly coloured male fish likely contributed to female dominance and vegetation cover may have protected males from birds. In addition, an aquatic predator, a large belastomid hemipteran, decreased the proportion of males in populations, possibly due to greater male activity rather than conspicuous colouration. Alternative explanations for a sex ratio bias, stemming from male–male contests for matings, are discussed. We conclude that the effect of environmental conditions on adult sex ratio varies dramatically even in closely related and ecologically similar sympatric species. Therefore, difficulties in explaining the ecological predictors of sex ratio biases are likely due to high stochasticity rather than limited sample size.

Keywords

Killifish Tertiary sex ratio Predator bias Temporary savanna pools Demographic consequences 

Supplementary material

10682_2014_9732_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (520 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 519 kb)
10682_2014_9732_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (565 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (JPEG 564 kb)

References

  1. Arendt JD, Reznick DN, López-Sepulcre A (2014) Replicated origin of female-biased adult sex ratio in introduced populations of the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 68:2343–2356Google Scholar
  2. Bartáková V, Reichard M, Janko K, Polačik M, Blažek R, Reichwald K, Cellerino A, Bryja J (2013) Strong population genetic structuring in an annual fish, Nothobranchius furzeri, suggests multiple savannah refugia in southern Mozambique. BMC Evol Biol 13:196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartoń K (2012) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1(2). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
  4. Blažek R, Polačik M, Reichard M (2013) Rapid growth, early maturation and short generation time in African annual fishes. EvoDevo 4:24PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Boukal DS, Berec L, Křivan V (2008) Does sex-selective predation stabilize or destabilize predatory-prey dynamics? PLoS ONE 3:e2687PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock TH, Coulson T (2002) Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devils is in the detail. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:1285–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1989) Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature 337:260–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock TH, Price OF, Albon SD, Jewel PA (1991) Persistent instability and population regulation in Soay sheep. J Anim Ecol 60:593–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guinness FE (1997) Density–related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 264:1509–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorn A, Ng’oma E, Janko K, Reichwald K, Polačik M, Platzer M, Cellerino A, Reichard M (2011) Phylogeny, genetic variability and colour polymorphism of an emerging animal model: the short-lived annual Nothobranchius fishes from southern Mozambique. Mol Phylogenet Evol 61:739–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ewulonu UK, Haas R, Turner BJ (1985) A multiple sex chromosome system in the annual killifish, Nothobranchius guentheri. Copeia 1985:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Field DL, Pickup M, Barrett SC (2012) Comparative analyses of sex-ratio variation in dioecious flowering plants. Evolution 67:661–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forsgren E, Amundsen T, Borg A, Bjelvenmark J (2004) Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature 429:551–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Genade T (2005) Laboratory manual for culturing N. furzeri. http://www.nothobranchius.info/pdfs/lab_protocols_1.pdf
  16. Genade T, Benedetti M, Terzibasi E, Roncaglia P, Valenzano DR, Cattaneo A, Cellerino A (2005) Annual fishes of the genus Nothobranchius as a model system for aging research. Aging Cell 4:223–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenwood PH (1986) The natural history of African lungfishes. J Morphol 190:163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haas R (1976a) Sexual selection in Nothobranchius guentheri (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae). Evolution 30:614–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haas R (1976b) Behavioral biology of the annual killifish, Nothobranchius guentheri. Copeia 1976:80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardy ICW (2002) Sex ratio. Concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harper JM (2010) Introduction: metabolism, life history and aging. Integr Comp Biol 50:778–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoelzel AR, Le Boeuf BJ, Reiter J, Campagna C (1999) Alpha-male paternity in elephant seals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hurst GD, Jiggins FM, von der Schulenburg JHG, Bertrand D, West SA, Goriacheva II, Zakharov IA, Werren JH, Stouthamer R, Majerus MEN (1999) Male–killing Wolbachia in two species of insect. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 266:735–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchings JA, Myers RA (1987) Escalation of an asymmetric contest: mortality resulting from mate competition in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Can J Zool 65:766–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inglima K, Perlmutter A, Markofsky J (1981) Reversible stage-specific embryonic inhibition mediated by the presence of adults in the annual fish Nothobranchius guentheri. J Exp Zool 215:23–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jirotkul M (1999) Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male–male competition in guppies. Anim Behav 58:287–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jobling S, Nolan M, Tyler CR, Brighty G, Sumpter JP (1998) Widespread sexual disruption in wild fish. Environ Sci Technol 32:2498–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jubb RA (1971) A new Nothobranchius (Pisces, Cyprinodontidae) from Southeastern Rhodesia. JAKA 8:12–19Google Scholar
  30. Kosztolányi A, Barta Z, Küpper C, Székely T (2011) Persistence of an extreme male-biased adult sex ratio in a natural population of polyandrous bird. J Evol Biol 24:1842–1846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Le Boeuf BJ (1974) Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. Am Zool 14:163–176Google Scholar
  32. Liao CP, Yu D, Chen YY, Reichard M, Liu HZ (2014) Reproductive behaviour of female rosy bitterling Rhodeus ocellatus in response to a female-biased operational sex ratio. Behaviour 151:755–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lodé T, Holveck MJ, Lesbarreres D, Pagano A (2004) Sex–biased predation by polecats influences the mating system of frogs. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271:399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucas-Sánchez A, Almaida-Pagán PF, Madrid JA, de Costa J, Mendiola P (2011) Age-related changes in fatty acid profile and locomotor activity rhythms in Nothobranchius korthausae. Exp Gerontol 46:970–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maan ME, Eshuis B, Haesler MP, Schneider MV, van Alphen JJM, Seehausen O (2008) Color polymorphism and predation in a Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Copeia 2008:621–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McKellar AE, Turcotte MM, Hendry AP (2009) Environmental factors influencing adult sex ratio in Trinidadian guppies. Oecologia 159:735–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Polačik M, Reichard M (2011) Asymmetric reproductive isolation between two sympatric annual killifish with extremely short lifespans. PLoS ONE 6:e22684PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Polačik M, Donner MT, Reichard M (2011) Age structure of annual Nothobranchius fishes in Mozambique: is there a hatching synchrony? J Fish Biol 78:796–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polačik M, Blažek R, Řežucha R, Vrtílek M, Terzibasi-Tozzini E, Reichard M (2014a) Alternative intrapopulation life-history strategies and their trade-offs in an African annual fish. J Evol Biol 27:854–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Polačik M, Harrod C, Blažek R, Reichard M (2014b) Trophic niche partitioning in communities of African annual fish: evidence from stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 721:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poulin R (2007) Evolutionary ecology of parasites. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Promislow DE, Montgomerie R, Martin TE (1992) Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 250:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
  45. Raja S, Suleman N, Compton SG, Moore JC (2008) The mechanism of sex ratio adjustment in a pollinating fig wasp. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:1603–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reale D, Bousses P, Chapuis JL (1996) Female-biased mortality induced by male sexual harassment in a feral sheep population. Can J Zool 74:1812–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reichard M (2010) Nothobranchius kadleci (Cyprinodontiformes: Nothobranchiidae), a new species of annual killifish from central Mozambique. Zootaxa 60:49–60Google Scholar
  48. Reichard M, Smith C, Jordan WC (2004a) Genetic evidence reveals density-dependent mediated success of alternative mating behaviours in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Mol Ecol 13:1569–1578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reichard M, Jurajda P, Smith C (2004b) Male-male interference competition decreases spawning rate in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reichard M, Polačik M, Sedláček O (2009) Distribution, colour polymorphism and habitat use of the African killifish Nothobranchius furzeri, the vertebrate with the shortest life span. J Fish Biol 74:198–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodd FH, Hughes KA, Grether GF, Baril CT (2002) A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Römer U, Beisenherz W (1996) Environmental determination of sex in Apistogrammai (Cichlidae) and two other freshwater fishes (Teleostei). J Fish Biol 48:714–725Google Scholar
  53. Rosenthal GG, Martinez TYF, de León FJG, Ryan MJ (2001) Shared preferences by predators and females for male ornaments in swordtails. Am Nat 158:146–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sedláček O, Baciaková B, Kratochvíl L (2014) Evolution of body colouration in killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheilidae, Nothobranchiidae, Rivulidae): Is male ornamentation constrained by intersexual genetic correlation? Zool Anz 253:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shidlovskiy KM, Watters BR, Wildekamp RH (2010) Notes on the annual killifish species Nothobranchius rachovii (Cyprinodontiformes; Nothobranchiidae) with the description of two new species. Zootaxa 2724:37–57Google Scholar
  56. Székely T, Weissing FJ, Komdeur J (2014a) Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding systems. J Evol Biol 27:1500–1512Google Scholar
  57. Székely T, Liker A, Freckleton RP, Fichtel C, Kappeler PM (2014b) Sex-biased survival predicts adult sex ratio variation in wild birds. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281:20140342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Terzibasi Tozzini E, Dorn A, Ng’oma E, Polačik M, Blažek R, Reichwald K, Petzold A, Watters B, Reichard M, Cellerino A (2013) Parallel evolution of senescence in annual fishes in response to extrinsic mortality. BMC Evol Biol 13:77CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Tobler M, Schlupp I, Plath M (2007) Predation of a cave fish (Poecilia mexicana, Poeciliidae) by a giant water-bug (Belostoma, Belostomatidae) in a Mexican sulphur cave. Ecol Entomol 32:492–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tobler M, Franssen CM, Plath M (2008) Male-biased predation of a cave fish by a giant water bug. Naturwissenschaften 95:775–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Valenzano DR, Kirschner J, Kamber RA, Zhang E, Weber D, Cellerino A, Englert C, Platzer M, Reichwald K, Brunet A (2009) Mapping loci associated with tail color and sex determination in the short-lived fish Nothobranchius furzeri. Genetics 183:1385–1395PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Wehi PM, Nakagawa S, Trewick SA, Morgan-Richards M (2011) Does predation result in adult sex ratio skew in a sexually dimorphic insect genus? J Evol Biol 24:2321–2328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wildekamp RH (2004) A world of killies: atlas of the oviparous cyprinidontiform fishes of the world, vol 4. American Killifish Association, ElyriaGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson K, Hardy ICW (2002) Statistical analysis of sex ratios: an introduction. In: Hardy ICW (ed) Sex ratio. Concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 48–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wourms JP (1972) The developmental biology of annual fishes III. Pre-embryonic and embryonic diapause of variable duration in the eggs of annual fishes. J Exp Zool 182:389–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Reichard
    • 1
  • Matej Polačik
    • 1
  • Radim Blažek
    • 1
  • Milan Vrtílek
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Vertebrate BiologyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of ScienceMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations