Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1057–1074

Assortative mating can limit the evolution of phenotypic plasticity

  • Etsuko Nonaka
  • Åke Brännström
  • Richard Svanbäck
Original Paper

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity, the ability to adjust phenotype to the exposed environment, is often advantageous for organisms living in heterogeneous environments. Although the degree of plasticity appears limited in nature, many studies have reported low costs of plasticity in various species. Existing studies argue for ecological, genetic, or physiological costs or selection eliminating plasticity with high costs, but have not considered costs arising from sexual selection. Here, we show that sexual selection caused by mate choice can impede the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in a trait used for mate choice. Plasticity can remain low to moderate even in the absence of physiological or genetic costs, when individuals phenotypically adapted to contrasting environments through plasticity can mate with each other and choose mates based on phenotypic similarity. Because the non-choosy sex (i.e., males) with lower degrees of plasticity are more favored in matings by the choosy sex (i.e., females) adapted to different environments, directional selection toward higher degrees of plasticity is constrained by sexual selection. This occurs at intermediate strengths of female choosiness in the range of the parameter value we examined. Our results demonstrate that mate choice is a potential source of an indirect cost to phenotypic plasticity in a sexually selected plastic trait.

Keywords

Assortative mating Disruptive selection Eco-evolutionary Mate choice Phenotypic plasticity Sexual selection 

Supplementary material

10682_2014_9728_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1557 kb)

References

  1. Auld JR, Agrawal AA, Relyea RA (2010) Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Philos Trans R Soc 277:503–511Google Scholar
  2. Berrigan D, Scheiner SM (2004) Modeling the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. In: Dewitt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 82–97Google Scholar
  3. Bolnick DI (2004) Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58:895–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolnick DI, Kirkpatrick M (2012) The relationship between intraspecific assortative mating and reproductive isolation between divergent populations. Curr Zool 58:484–492Google Scholar
  5. Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callahan HS, Maughan H, Steiner UK (2008) Phenotypic plasticity, costs of phenotypes, and costs of plasticity: toward an integrative view. Ann NY Acad Sci 1133:44–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conte GL, Schluter D (2013) Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair. Evolution 67:1477–1484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornwallis CK, Uller T (2010) Toward an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol Evol 25:145–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crespi BJ (1989) Causes of assortative mating in arthropods. Anim Behav 38:980–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crispo E (2008) Modifying effects of phenotypic plasticity on interactions among natural selection, adaptation and gene flow. J Evol Biol 21:1460–1469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crowley PH, Travers SE, Linton MC, Cohn SL, Sih A, Sargent RC (1991) Mate density, predation risk, and the seasonal sequence of mate choices: a dynamic game. Am Nat 137:567–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Cara MAR, Barton NH, Kirkpatrick M (2008) A model for the evolution of assortative mating. Am Nat 171:580–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dechaine JM, Johnson JA, Brock MT et al (2007) Constraints on the evolution of adaptive plasticity: costs of plasticity to density are expressed in segregating progenies. N Phytol 176:874–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewitt TJ, Scheiner SM (2004) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewitt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:77–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M (1999) On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doebeli M (1996) A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J Evol Biol 9:893–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doebeli M, Blok HJ, Leimar O et al (2007) Multimodal pattern formation in phenotype distributions of sexual populations. Proc R Soc B 274:347–357PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Edelaar P, Siepielski AM, Clobert J (2008) Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evolution 62:2462–2472Google Scholar
  20. Ernande B, Dieckmann U (2004) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in spatially structured environments: implications of intraspecific competition, plasticity costs and environmental characteristics. J Evol Biol 17:613–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzpatrick BM (2012) Underappreciated consequences of phenotypic plasticity for ecological speciation. Int J Ecol 2012:1–12Google Scholar
  22. Fowler-Finn KD, Rodriguez RL (2012) Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment. Evolution 66:459–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garduno-Paz MV, Adams CE (2010) Discrete prey availability promotes foraging segregation and early divergence in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. Hydrobiologia 650:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gavrilets S (2004) Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Geiselhardt S, Otte T, Hilker M (2012) Looking for a similar partner: host plants shape mating preferences of herbivorous insects by altering their contact pheromones. Ecol Lett 15:971–977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 81:2340–2361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenfield MD, Rodriguez RL (2004) Genotype-environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim Behav 68:1461–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffith SC, Sheldon BC (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the expression of sexually selected traits: neglected components of variation. Anim Behav 61:987–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Härdling R, Kokko H (2005) The evolution of prudent choice. Evol Ecol Res 7:697–715Google Scholar
  30. Hebets EA, Vink CJ (2007) Experience leads to preference: experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders. Behav Ecol 18:1010–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huber SK, De Leon LF, Hendry AP et al (2007) Reproductive isolation of sympatric morphs in a population of Darwin’s finches. Proc R Soc B 274:1709–1714PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Ingleby FC, Hunt J, Hosken DJ (2010) The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. J Evol Biol 23:2031–2045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jiang Y, Bolnick DI, Kirkpatrick M (2013) Assortative mating in animals. Am Nat 18:E125–E138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM et al (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat 157:245–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirkpatrick M, Nuismer SL (2004) Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc R Soc B 271:687–693PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigné V (2002) Speciation by natural and sexual selection. Am Nat 159:S22–S35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kondrashov AS, Kondrashov FA (1999) Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400:351–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kondrashov AS, Shpak M (1998) On the origin of species by means of assortative mating. Proc R Soc B 265:2273–2278PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Kozak GM, Head ML, Lackey ACR, Boughman JW (2013) Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species. J Evol Biol 26:130–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Langerhans AK, Makowicz AM (2009) Shared and unique features of morphological differentiation between predator regimes in Gambusia caymanensis. J Evol Biol 22:2231–2242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Langerhans AK, Gifford ME, Joseph EO (2007) Ecological speciation in Gambusia fishes. Evolution 61:2056–2074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levin DA (2009) Flowering-time plasticity facilitates niche shifts in adjacent populations. N Phytol 183:661–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lind MI, Johansson F (2009) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity in island populations of the common frog Rana temporaria under divergent selection pressures. Evolution 63:1508–1518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lind MI, Ingvarsson PK, Johansson H et al (2011) Gene flow and selection on phenotypic plasticity in an island system of Rana temporaria. Evolution 65:684–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maan ME, Seehausen O (2011) Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Ecol Lett 14:591–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin CH (2013) Strong assortative mating by diet, color, size, and morphology but limited progress toward sympatric speciation in a classic example: Cameroon crater lake cichlids. Evolution 67:2114–2123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKinnon JS, Mori S, Blackman BK, David L, Kingsley DM, Jamieson L, Chou J, Schluter D (2004) Evidence for ecology’s role in speciation. Nature 429(6989):294–298Google Scholar
  49. Miner BG, Sultan SE, Morgan SG et al (2005) Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 20:685–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagel L, Schluter D (1998) Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 52:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Olsson J, Eklöv P (2005) Habitat structure, feeding mode and morphological reversibility: factors influencing phenotypic plasticity in perch. Evol Ecol Res 7:1109–1123Google Scholar
  52. Olsson J, Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2006) Growth rate constrain morphological divergence when driven by competition. Oikos 115:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pigliucci M (2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends Ecol Evol 20:481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Relyea RA (2002) Cost of phenotypic plasticity. Am Nat 159:272–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosenzweig ML, MacArthur RH (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator–prey interactions. Am Nat 97:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rueffler C, van Dooren TJM, Leimar O et al (2006) Disruptive selection and then what? Trends Ecol Evol 21:238–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scheiner SM (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:35–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scheiner SM (2013) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. XII. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity. Ecol Evol 3:4596–4609PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Scheiner SM, Lyman RF (1991) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. II. Response to selection. J Evol Biol 4:23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schlichting CD, Levin DA (1986) Phenotypic plasticity: an evolving plant character. Biol J Linn Soc 29:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1998) Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  62. Servedio MR, Kopp M (2012) Sexual selection and magic traits in speciation with gene flow. Curr Zool 58:510–516Google Scholar
  63. Servedio MR, Van Doorn GS, Kopp M et al (2011) Magic traits in speciation: ‘magic’ but not rare? Trends Ecol Evol 26:389–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Snowberg LK, Bolnick DI (2008) Assortative mating by diet in a phenotypically unimodal but ecologically variable population of stickleback. Am Nat 172:733–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Snowberg LK, Bolnick DI (2012) Partitioning the effects of spatial isolation, nest habitat, and individual diet in causing assortative mating within a population of threespine stickleback. Evolution 66:3582–3594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2006) Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity: causes of morphological and dietary variation in Eurasian perch. Evol Ecol Res 8:37–49Google Scholar
  68. Svanbäck R, Pineda-Krch M, Doebeli M (2009) Fluctuating population dynamics promotes the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Am Nat 174:176–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Takimoto G, Higashi M, Yamamura N (2000) A deterministic genetic model for sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 54:1870–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thibert-Plante X, Gavrilets S (2013) Evolution of mate choice and the so-called magic traits in ecological speciation. Ecol Lett 16:1004–1013PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Thibert-Plante X, Hendry A (2011) The consequences of phenotypic plasticity for ecological speciation. J Evol Biol 24:326–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gomez JM (2007) Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. N Phytol 176:749–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van Buskirk J, Steiner UK (2009) The fitness costs of developmental canalization and plasticity. J Evol Biol 22:852–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Van Doorn GS, Edelaar P, Weissing FJ (2009) On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Science 326:1704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wagner WE, Smeds MR, Wiegmann DD (2001) Experience affects female responses to male song in the variable field cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ethology 107:769–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weissing FJ, Edelaar P, van Doorn GS (2011) Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:461–480PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Speciation. West-Eberhard developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 526–563Google Scholar
  78. Whitman DW, Agrawal AA (2009) What is phenotypic plasticity and why is it important? In: Whitman DW, Ananthakrishnan TN (eds) Phenotypic plasticity of insects. Science, Enfield, pp 1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Windig JJ, de Kovel CGF, de Jong G (2004) Genetics and mechanics of plasticity. In: Dewitt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 31–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Etsuko Nonaka
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Åke Brännström
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Richard Svanbäck
    • 6
  1. 1.Integrated Science LabUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  4. 4.Department of Mathematics and Mathematical StatisticsUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  5. 5.Evolution and Ecology ProgramInternational Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria
  6. 6.Department of Ecology and Genetics/LimnologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations