Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 949–969 | Cite as

Differences in locomotor behavior correspond to different patterns of morphological selection in two species of waterfall-climbing gobiid fishes

  • Sandy M. Kawano
  • William C. Bridges
  • Heiko L. Schoenfuss
  • Takashi Maie
  • Richard W. Blob
Original Paper

Abstract

Behavior plays an important role in mediating relationships between morphology and performance in animals and, thus, can influence how selection operates. However, to what extent can the use of specific behaviors be associated with particular types of selection on morphological traits? Laboratory selection analyses on waterfall-climbing gobiid fishes were performed to investigate how behavioral variations in locomotion can affect patterns of linear and nonlinear morphological selection. Species from sister genera (Sicyopterus stimpsoni and Sicydium punctatum) that use different climbing behaviors were exposed to similar artificial waterfalls to simulate a controlled selective regime involving the climbing of a nearly vertical slope against flowing water. Juvenile S. stimpsoni “inch up” waterfalls by alternate attachment of oral and pelvic suckers with little axial or fin movement, leading to straightforward expectations that climbing selection should favor morphologies that improve drag reduction and substrate adhesion. In contrast, juvenile S. punctatum climb using substantial axial and fin movements, complicating expectations for selection patterns and potentially promoting correlational selection. Comparisons of directional, quadratic and correlational selection coefficients for various morphological traits and trait interactions indicated that these species showed different selection patterns that generally fit these predictions. Both directional and correlational selection patterns were different between the species, and on average were stronger in S. punctatum compared to S. stimpsoni. Stronger selection in S. punctatum may be related to its climbing style that requires more integrated movement of the fins and body axis than S. stimpsoni, promoting dynamic interactions among body regions within a complicated hydrodynamic environment.

Keywords

Behavior Ecomorphology Fish Linear selection Nonlinear selection 

Supplementary material

10682_2012_9621_MOESM1_ESM.doc (156 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 156 kb)

References

  1. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int 11:36–42Google Scholar
  2. Arnold SJ (1983) Morphology, performance and fitness. Am Zool 23:347–361Google Scholar
  3. Bergmann PJ, Meyers JJ, Irschick DJ (2009) Directional evolution of stockiness coevolves with ecology and locomotion in lizards. Evolution 63:215–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berner D, Adams DC, Grandchamp A-C, Hendry AP (2008) Natural selection drives patterns of lake-stream divergence in stickleback foraging morphology. J Evol Biol 21:1653–1665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackledge TA, Gillespie RG (2004) Convergent evolution of behavior in an adaptive radiation of Hawaiian web-building spiders. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:16228–16233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake RW (2006) Biomechanics of rheotaxis in six teleost genera. Can J Zool 84:1173–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blob RW, Wright KM, Becker M, Maie T, Iverson TJ, Julius ML, Schoenfuss HL (2007) Ontogenetic change in novel functions: waterfall climbing in adult Hawaiian gobiid fishes. J Zool 273:200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blob RW, Bridges WC, Ptacek MB, Maie T, Cediel RA, Bertolas MM, Julius ML, Schoenfuss HL (2008) Morphological selection in an extreme flow environment: body shape and waterfall-climbing success in the Hawaiian stream fish Sicyopterus stimpsoni. Int Comp Biol 48:734–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blob RW, Bridges WC, Ptacek MB, Maie T, Cediel RA, Bertolas MM, Julius ML, Schoenfuss HL (2009) Erratum: morphological selection in an extreme flow environment: body shape and waterfall-climbing success in the Hawaiian stream fish Sicyopterus stimpsoni. Int Comp Biol 49:732–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blob RW, Kawano SM, Moody KN, Bridges WC, Maie T, Ptacek MB, Julius ML, Schoenfuss HL (2010) Morphological selection and the evaluation of potential tradeoffs between escape from predators and the climbing of waterfalls in the Hawaiian stream goby Sicyopterus stimpsoni. Int Comp Biol 50:1185–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blount ZD, Borland CZ, Lenski RE (2008) Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:7899–7906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blows MW (2007) A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J Evol Biol 20:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blows MW, Brooks R (2003) Measuring nonlinear selection. Am Nat 162:815–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blows MW, Brooks R, Kraft PG (2003) Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies. Evolution 57:1622–1630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brodie ED III (1992) Correlational selection for color pattern and antipredator behavior in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Evolution 46:1284–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brodie ED III, Moore AJ, Janzen FJ (1995) Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 10:313–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bürger R (1986) Constraints for the evolution of functionally coupled characters: a nonlinear analysis of a phenotypic model. Evolution 40:182–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Calsbeek R (2008) An ecological twist on the morphology-performance-fitness axis. Evol Ecol Res 10:197–212Google Scholar
  19. Calsbeek R, Irschick DJ (2007) The quick and the dead: correlation selection on morphology, performance, and habitat use in island lizards. Evolution 61:2493–2503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlson RL, Lauder GV (2010) Living on the bottom: kinematics of benthic station-holding in darter fishes (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). J Morph 271:25–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carlson SM, Rich HB Jr, Quinn TP (2009) Does variation in selection imposed by bears drive divergence among populations in the size and shape of sockeye salmon? Evolution 63:1244–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chenoweth SF, Blows MW (2005) Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. Am Nat 165:281–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Moritz C, Estoup A, Kikkawa J, Owens IP (2002) Microevolution in island forms: the roles of drift and directional selection in morphological divergence of a passerine bird. Evolution 56:2090–2099PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Daniel TL (1984) Unsteady aspects of aquatic locomotion. Am Zool 24:121–134Google Scholar
  25. Dockx C (2007) Directional and stabilizing selection on wing size and shape in migrant and resident monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.), in Cuba. Biol J Linn Soc 92:605–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Domenici P, Turesson H, Brodersen J, Brönmark C (2008) Predator-induced morphology enhances escape locomotion in Crucian carp. Pro Roy Soc B 275:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Endler JA (1986) Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Eroukhmanoff F, Hargeby A, Arnberg NN, Hellgren O, Bensch S, Svensson EI (2009) Parallelism and historical contingency during rapid ecotype divergence in an isopod. J Evol Biol 22:1098–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fields Development Team (2006) Fields: tools for spatial data. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO. http://www.image.ucar.edu/Software/Fields/
  30. Fitzsimons JM, Nishimoto RT (1995) Use of fish behaviour in assessing the effects of Hurricane Iniki on the Hawaiian island of Kaua’i. Environ Biol Fish 43:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fulcher BA, Motta PJ (2006) Suction disc performance of echeneid fishes. Can J Zool 84:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fuller RC, Baer CF, Travis J (2005) How and when selection experiments might actually be useful. Int Comp Biol 45:391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garant D, Kruuk LEB, McCleery RH, Sheldon BC (2007) The effects of environmental heterogeneity on multivariate selection on reproductive traits in female great tits. Evolution 61:1546–1559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garland T (2003) Selection experiments: an underutilized tool in biomechanics and organismal biology. In: Bels V, Gasc J, Casinos A (eds) Biomechanics and evolution. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 23–56Google Scholar
  35. Gomes JL, Monteiro LR (2008) Morphological divergence patterns among populations of Poecilia vivipara (Teleostei Poeciliidae): test of an ecomorphological paradigm. Biol J Linn Soc 93:799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoekstra HE (2006) Genetics, development and evolution of adaptive pigmentation in vertebrates. Heredity 97:222–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hoang A, Hill CE, Peerli P, Kingsolver JG (2001) Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98:9157–9160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoekstra HE, Krenz JG, Nachman MW (2005) Local adaptation in the rock pocket mouse (Chaetodipus intermedius): natural selection and phylogenetic history of populations. Nature 94:217–228Google Scholar
  40. Hoerner SF (1958) Fluid-dynamic drag. Published by the author, Midland ParkGoogle Scholar
  41. Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, Berrigan D, Serra L (2000) Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287:308–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Irchick DJ, Ramos M, Buckely C, Elstrott J, Carlisle E, Lailvaux SP, Bloch N, Herrel A, Vanhooydonck B (2006) Are morphology-performance relationships invariant across different seasons? A test with the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis). Oikos 114:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Irschick DJ, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Husak JF, Meyers JJ (2007) New directions for studying selection in nature: studies of performance and communities. Physiol Biochem Zool 80:557–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Irschick DJ, Meyers JJ, Husak JF, Le Galliard JF (2008) How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis. Evol Ecol Res 10:177–196Google Scholar
  45. Janzen FJ, Stern HS (1998) Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52:1564–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jayne BC, Bennett AF (1990) Selection on locomotor performance capacity in a natural population of garter snakes. Evolution 44:1204–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaplan RH, Phillips PC (2006) Ecological and developmental context of natural selection: maternal effects and thermally induced plasticity in the frog Bombina orientalis. Evolution 60:142–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Keith P, Hoareau TB, Lord C, Ah-Yane O, Gimmoneau G, Robinet T, Valade P (2008) Characterisation of post-larval to juvenile stages, metamorphosis and recruitment of an amphidromous goby, Sicyopterus lagocephalus (Pallas) (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Sicydiinae). Mar Freshwater Res 59:876–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Keith P, Lord C, Lorion J, Watanabe S, Tsukamoto K, Couloux A, Dettai A (2011) Phylogeny and biogeography of Sicydiinae (Teleostei: Gobiidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Mar Biol 158:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW (2007) Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience 57:561–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gilbert P, Beerli P (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat 157:245–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Koehl MAR (1984) How do benthic organisms withstand moving water? Am Zool 24:57–70Google Scholar
  53. Kuo C-Y, Gillis GB, Irschick DJ (2011) Loading effects on jump performance in green anole lizards, Anolis carolinensis. J Exp Biol 214:2073–2079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Langerhans RB (2008) Predictability of phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes. Int Comp Biol 48:750–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Langerhans RB (2009) Morphology, performance, fitness: functional insight into a post-Pleistocene radiation of mosquitofish. Biol Lett 5:488–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Langerhans RB, DeWitt TJ (2004) Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification. Am Nat 164:335–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Langerhans RB, Layman CA, Shokrollahi AM, DeWitt TJ (2004) Predator-driven phenotypic diversification in Gambusia affinis. Evolution 58:2305–2318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Langerhans RB, Knouft JH, Losos JB (2006) Shared and unique features of diversification in Greater Antillean Anolis ecomorphs. Evolution 60:362–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lauder GV, Liem KF (1983) The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bull Mus Comp Zool 150:95–197Google Scholar
  61. Leal M, Knox AK, Losos JB (2002) Lack of convergence in aquatic Anolis lizards. Evolution 56:785–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. LeBras NR, Hockham LR, Ritchie MG (2003) Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on ‘honest’ female ornamentation. Proc R Soc B 270:2159–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee JC (1982) Accuracy and precision in anuran morphometrics: artifacts of preservation. Syst Zool 31:266–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lenth RV (2009) Response-surface methods in R, using rsm. J Stat Softw 32:2–17Google Scholar
  65. Losos JB (1990) The evolution of form and function: morphology and locomotor performance in West Indian Anolis lizards. Evolution 44:1189–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Losos JB, Jackman TR, Larson A, de Quieroz K, Rodríguez-Schettino L (1998) Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279:2115–2118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Maie T, Schoenfuss HL, Blob RW (2007) Ontogenetic scaling of body proportions in waterfall-climbing gobiid fishes from Hawai’i and Dominica: implications for locomotor function. Copeia 2007:755–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Maie T, Schoenfuss HL, Blob RW (2012) Performance and scaling of a novel locomotor structure: adhesive capacity of climbing gobiid fishes. J Exp Biol 215:3925–3936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Martin RF (1978) Clutch weight/total body weight ratios of lizards (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae): preservative induced variation. J Herpetol 12:248–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Martin J (1996) Effects of recent feeding on locomotor performance of juvenile Psammodromus algirus lizards. Funct Ecol 10:390–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Martin CL (2012) Weak disruptive selection and incomplete phenotypic divergence in two classic examples of sympatric speciation: Cameroon Crater Lake cichlids. Am Nat 180:E90–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Martinez MM (1996) Issues for aquatic pedestrian locomotion. Amer Zool 36:619–627Google Scholar
  73. Matos M, Avelar T, Rose MR (2002) Variation in the rate of convergent evolution: adaptation to a laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura. J Evol Biol 15:673–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McCollum SA, Leimberger JD (1997) Predator-induced morphological changes in an amphibian: predation by dragonflies affects tadpole shape and color. Oecologia 109:615–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McDowall RM (2001) Diadromy, diversity and divergence: implications for speciation processes in fishes. Fish Fish 2:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McDowall RM (2003) Hawaiian biogeography and the islands’ freshwater fish fauna. J Biogeogr 30:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. McDowall RM (2004) Ancestry and amphidromy in island freshwater fish faunas. Fish Fish 5:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McDowall RM (2007) On amphidromy, a distinct form of diadromy in aquatic organisms. Fish Fisheries 8:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McGuigan K, Chenoweth SF, Blows MW (2005) Phenotypic divergence along lines of genetic variance. Am Nat 165:32–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nishimoto RT, Fitzsimons JM (1999) Behavioral determinants of the instream distribution of native Hawaiian stream fishes. In: Séret B, Sire J-Y (eds) Proceedings of the fifth Indo-Pacific fish conference, Nouméa. Societe Francaise d’Ichthyologie, Paris, pp 813–818Google Scholar
  81. Nishimoto RT, Kuamo’o DGK (1997) Recruitment of goby postlarvae into Hakalau Stream, Hawai’i Island. Micronesica 30:41–49Google Scholar
  82. Ożgo M, Kinnison MT (2008) Contingency and determinism during convergent contemporary evolution in the polymorphic land snail, Cepaea nemoralis. Evol Ecol Res 10:721–733Google Scholar
  83. Reznick DN, Travis J (1996) The empirical study of adaptation in natural populations. In: Rose MR, Lauder GV (eds) Adaptation. Academic Press, New York, pp 243–289Google Scholar
  84. Reznick DN, Shaw FH, Rodd FH, Shaw RG (1997) Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275:1934–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rivera G (2008) Ecomorphological variation in shell shape of the freshwater turtle Pseudemys concinna inhabiting different aquatic flow regimes. Int Comp Biol 48:769–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schluter D (1996) Ecological causes of adaptive radiation. Am Nat 148:S40–S64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  88. Schoenfuss HL, Blob RW (2003) Kinematics of waterfall climbing in Hawaiian freshwater fishes (Gobiidae): vertical population at the aquatic-terrestrial interface. J Zool 261:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schoenfuss HL, Blob RW (2007) The importance of functional morphology for fishery conservation and management: applications to Hawaiian amphidromous fishes. Bishop Mus Bull Cult Environ Stud 3:125–141Google Scholar
  90. Schoenfuss HL, Maie T, Kawano SM, Blob RW (2011) Performance across extreme environments: comparing waterfall climbing among amphidromous gobioid fishes from Caribbean and Pacific Islands. Cybium 35:361–369Google Scholar
  91. Smith AM (1996) Cephalopod sucker design and the physical limits to negative pressure. J Exp Biol 199:949–958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Stinchcombe JR, Agrawal AF, Hohenlohe PA, Arnold SJ, Blows MW (2008) Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing? Evolution 62(9):2435–2440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Strobbe F, McPeek MA, De Block M, De Meester L, Stoks R (2009) Survival selection on escape performance and its underlying phenotypic traits: a case of many-to-one mapping. J Evol Biol 22:1172–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Taillebois L, Keith P, Valade P, Torres P, Baloche S, Dufour S, Rousseau K (2011) Involvement of thyroid hormones in the control of larval metamorphosis in Sicyopterus lagocephalus (Teleostei: Gobioidei) at the time of river recruitment. Gen Comp Endocr 173:281–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Thacker CE (2003) Molecular phylogeny of the gobioids fishes (Teleostei: Perciformes: Gobioidei). Mol Phylogenet Evol 26:354–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Travisano M, Mongold JA, Bennett AF, Lenski RE (1995) Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance, and history in evolution. Science 267:87–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vanhooydonck B, Irschick DJ (2002) Is evolution predictable? Evolutionary relationships of divergence in ecology, performance and morphology in Old and New World lizard radiations. In: Aerts P, D’Août K, Herrel A, Van Damme R (eds) Topics in functional and ecological vertebrate morphology. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp 191–204Google Scholar
  98. Wainwright PC (2007) Functional versus morphological diversity in macroevolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:381–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Walker JA, Alfaro ME, Fulton CJ (2010) Fluid dynamic drag, body shape, and endurance swimming performance among coral reef fishes. Presented at the 2010 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology annual meeting. http://www.sicb.org/meetings/2010/schedule/abstractdetails.php3?id=761
  100. Webb PW (1975) Hydrodynamics and energetics of fish propulsion. Bull Fish Res Board Can 190:1–159Google Scholar
  101. Webb PW (1978) Fast-start performance and body form in seven species of teleost fish. J Exp Biol 74:211–226Google Scholar
  102. Webb PW (1984) Body form, locomotion, and foraging in aquatic vertebrates. Am Zool 24:107–120Google Scholar
  103. Weber PW, Howle LE, Murrary MM, Fish FE (2009) Lift and drag performance on odontocete cetacean flippers. J Exp Biol 212:2149–2158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Whitlock MC, Phillips PC, Moore FB-G, Tonsor SJ (1995) Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26:601–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wood TE, Burke JM, Rieseberg LH (2005) Parallel genotypic adaptation: when evolution repeats itself. Genetica 123:157–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Young RL, Haselkorn TS, Badyaev AV (2007) Functional equivalence of morphologies enables morphological and ecological diversity. Evolution 61:2480–2492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandy M. Kawano
    • 1
  • William C. Bridges
    • 2
  • Heiko L. Schoenfuss
    • 3
  • Takashi Maie
    • 1
  • Richard W. Blob
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical SciencesClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesSt. Cloud State UniversitySt. CloudUSA

Personalised recommendations