Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 417–433 | Cite as

Ecological drivers of the Ediacaran-Cambrian diversification of Metazoa

Original Paper

Abstract

Organismal modifications to their physical and chemical environment play a significant role in structuring many modern ecosystems, and experimental evidence suggests that such behavior can increase diversity. Despite the important role such activities play in connecting ecology and evolution, less is known of the macroevolutionary impact of such influences, especially their role during major evolutionary transitions. The Ediacaran-Cambrian diversification of Metazoa encompassed the appearance and early diversification of virtually all major clades of marine animals and the establishment of metazoan-dominated ecosystems. Here we assess the role of positive ecological feedbacks using a new compilation of the first occurrences of all metazoan phyla, classes; orders and equivalent stem taxa, as well as data from a previously published compendium on fossils from the early to middle Cambrian of China. The results reveal relatively minor feedback during the Ediacaran, but a substantial increase during the Cambrian, principally through bioturbation and the appearance of a number of structural engineers, including sponges. Chemical modification of the environment through filtering and bioturbation seems to have had the largest impact. Data on taxic diversity is a poor proxy for abundance, or for the actual environmental impact of these activities, however. Future assessments of the influence of ecological feedbacks on this event will require standardized assessments of the abundance of taxa with different ecological roles.

Keywords

Ediacaran Cambrian Ecology Feedback Niche construction 

References

  1. Altieri AH, van Wesennbeek B, Bertness MD, Sillman BR (2010) Facilitation cascade drives positive relationship between native biodiversity and invasion sucess. Ecology 91:1269–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babcock LE, Peng SC (2007) Cambrian chronostratigraphy: current state and future plans. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol 254:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bengtson S (2005) Mineralized skeletons and early animal evolution. In: Briggs DEG (ed) Evolving form and function: fossils and development. Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, pp 101–124Google Scholar
  4. Berke SK (2010) Functional groups of ecosystem engineers: a proposed classification with comments on current issues. Int Comp Biol 50:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bottjer DJ, Hagadorn JW, Dornbos SQ (2000) The Cambrian substrate revolution. GSA Today 10:1–7Google Scholar
  6. Breitburg DL, Crump BC, Dabiri JO, Gallegos CL (2010) Ecosystem engineers in the pelagic realm: alteration of habitat by species ranging from microbes to jellyfish. Int Comp Biol 50:188–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butterfield NJ (1997) Plankton ecology and the proterozoic–phanerozoic transition. Paleobiology 23:247–262Google Scholar
  8. Catling DC, Glein CR, Zahnle KJ, McKay CP (2005) Why O2 is required by complex life on habitable planets and the concept of planetary “oxygenation time”. Astrobiology 5:415–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen JY (2009) The sudden appearance of diverse animal body plans during the Cambrian explosion. Int J Dev Biol 53:733–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuddington K, Wilson WG, Hastings A (2009) Ecosystem engineers: feedback and population dynamics. Am Nat 173:488–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dame RF, Prins TC (1998) Bivalve carrying capacity in coastal ecosystems. Aquat Ecol 31:409–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dame RF, Bushek D, Prins TC (2001) Benthic suspension feeders as determinants of ecosystem structure and function in shallow coastal waters. In: Reise K (ed) Ecological comparisons of sedimentary shores. Verlag, Berlin, pp 1–37Google Scholar
  13. Davidson EH, Erwin DH (2010) Evolutionary innovation and stability in animal gene networks. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 312B:1–5Google Scholar
  14. Dewar WK, Bingham RJ, Iverson RL, Nowacek DP, Laurent LC, Wiebe PH (2006) Does the marine biosphere mix the ocean? J Mar Res 64:541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diaz MC, Rutzler K (2001) Sponges: an essential component of Caribbean coral reefs. Bull Mar Sci 69:535–546Google Scholar
  16. Droser ML, Bottjer DJ (1989) Ordovician increase in extent and depth of bioturbation: implications for understanding early Paleozoic ecospace utilization. Geology 17:850–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erwin DH (1992) A preliminary classification of evolutionary radiations. Hist Biol 6:133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erwin DH (2005) The origin of animal body plans. In: Briggs DEG (ed) Evolving form and function: fossils and development. Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, pp 67–80Google Scholar
  19. Erwin DH (2007) Increasing returns, ecological feedback, and the early Triassic recovery. Palaeoworld 16:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erwin DH (2008) Macroevolution of ecosystem engineering, niche construction and diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 23:304–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erwin DH (2009) Early origin of the bilaterian developmental toolkit. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2253–2261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erwin DH (2011) Evolutionary uniformitarianism. Developmental biology, (in press). http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.01.020
  23. Erwin DH, Valentine JW (2012) The Cambrian explosion: the construction of animal biodiversity. Roberts and Co, GreenwoodGoogle Scholar
  24. Erwin DH, Valentine JW, Sepkoski JJ Jr (1987) A comparative study of diversification events: the early Paleozoic versus the Mesozoic. Evolution 41:1177–1186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Erwin DH, Laflamme M, Tweedt SM, Sperling EA, Pisani D, Peterson KJ. The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals (in review)Google Scholar
  26. Fedonkin MA, Simonetta A, Ivantsov AY (2007) New data on kimberella, the vendian mollusc-like organism (White sea region, Russia): paleontological and evolutionary implications. In: Vickers-Rich P, Komarower P (eds) The rise and fall of the ediacaran biota. Geological Society, London, pp 157–179Google Scholar
  27. Gehling JG, Droser ML (2009) Textured organic surfaces associated with the ediacara biota in south Australia. Earth Sci Rev 96:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gill JM, Coma R (1998) Benthic suspension feeders: their paramount role in littoral marine food webs. Trends Ecol Evol 13:316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gutierrez JL, Jones CG, Strayer DL, Iribarne OO (2003) Mollusks as ecosystem engineers: the role of shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos 101:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hagadorn JW, Bottjer DJ (1997) Wrinkle structures: microbially mediated sedimentary structures common in subtidal siliciclastic settings at the proterozoic–phanerozoic transition. Geology 25:1047–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halverson GP, Hurtgen MT, Porter SM, Collins AS (2009) Neoproterozoic-Cambrian biogeochemical evolution in Neoproterozoic-Cambrian tectonics, global change and evolution: a focus on southwestern. In: Gondawana Gaucher C, Sial AN, Halverson GP, Frimmel HE (eds) Developments in Precambrian geology. Elsevier, USA, pp 351–365Google Scholar
  32. Ivantsov AY (2009) New reconstruction of kimberella, problematic vendian metazoan. Paleontol J 43:601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson JB (2001) What was natural in the coastal oceans? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5411–5418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen S, Droser ML, Gehling JG (2005) Trace fossil preservation and the early evolution of animals. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol 220:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jensen S, Droser ML, Gehling JG (2006) A critical look at the ediacaran trace fossil record. In: Xiao S, Kaufmane AJ (eds) Neoproterozoic geobiology and paleobiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 115–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones CG, Gutierrez JL (2007) On the meaning, usage and purpose of the ecosystem engineering concept. In: Cuddington K, Byers JE, Wilson WG, Hastings A (eds) Ecosystem engineers: plants–protists. Academic Press, NY, pp 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Katija K, Dabiri JO (2009) A viscosity-enhanced mechanism for biogenic ocean mixing. Nature 460:624–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kiessling W (2008) Sampling-standardized expansion and collapse of reef building in the phanerozoic. Foss Rec 11:7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knoll AH, Carroll SB (1999) Early animal evolution: emerging views from comparative biology and geology. Science 284:2129–2137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krakauer DC, Page KM, Erwin DH (2009) Diversity, dilemmas and monopolies of niche construction. Am Nat 173:26–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Laflamme M, Xiao S, Kowalewski M (2009) Osmotrophy in modular ediacara organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:14438–14443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laland KN, Sterelny K (2006) Seven reasons (not) to neglect niche construction. Evolution 60:1751–1762PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW (1999) Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:10242–10247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li GX, Steiner M, Zhu XJ, Yang A, Wang HF, Erdtmann BD (2007) Early Cambrian metazoan fossil record of south China: generic diversity and radiation patterns. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol 254:229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lohrer AM, Thrush SF, Gibbs MM (2004) Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions. Nature 431:1092–1095PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Losos JB (2010) Adaptive radiation, ecological opportunity, and evolutionary determinism. Am Nat 175:623–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Love GD, Grosjean E, Stalvies C, Fike DA, Grotzinger JP, Bradley AS, Kelly AE, Bhatia M, Meredith W, Snape CE, Bowring SA, Condon DJ, Summons RE (2009) Fossil steroids record the appearance of demospongiae during the cryogenian period. Nature 457:718–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maloof AC, Porter SM, Moore JL, Dudas FO, Bowring SA, Higgins JA, Fike DA, Eddy MP (2010a) The earliest Cambrian record of animals and ocean geochemical change. GSA Bull 122:1731–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maloof AC, Rose CV, Beach R, Samuels BM, Calmet CC, Erwin DH, Poirier GR, Yao N, Simons FJ (2010b) Possible animal-body fossils in pre-marinoan limestones from south Australia. Nat Geosci 3:653–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mangano MG, Buatois LA (2007) Trace fossils in evolutionary paleoecology. In: Miller WF III (ed) Trace fossils: concepts, problems, prospects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 391–411Google Scholar
  53. Marshall CR (2006) Explaining the Cambrian “explosion” of animals. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:355–384Google Scholar
  54. Mermillod-Blondin F, Rosenberg R (2006) Ecosystem engineering: the impact of bioturbation on biogeochemical processes in marine and freshwater benthic habitats. Aquatic Sci 68:434–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Narbonne GM (2005) The ediacara biota: neoproterozoic origin of animals and their ecosystems. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:421–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newell RIE (1988) Ecological changes in Chesapeake Bay: are they the result of overharvesting the American oyster, C. virginica?. Chesapeake Bay Consortium, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  57. Newell RIE (2004) Ecosystem influences of natural and cultivated populations of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs: a review. J Shellfish Res 23:51–61Google Scholar
  58. Nogaro G, Mermillod-Blondin F, Valett MH, Francois-Carcaillet F, Gaudet JP, Lafont M, Gibert J (2009) Ecosystem engineering at the sediment–water interface: bioturbation and consumer-substrate interaction. Oecologia 161(1):125–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  60. Ostroumov SA (2005) Some aspects of the water filtering activity of filter feeders. Hydrobiologia 542:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Post DM, Palkovacs EP (2009) Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theater and the evolutionary play. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 364:1629–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reiswig HM (1971) Particle feeding in natural populations of three marine demon sponges. Biol Bull 141:568–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schields-Zhou G, Och L (2011) The case for a neoproterozoic oxygenation event: geochemical evidence and biological consequences. GSA Today 21:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Seilacher A, Pfluger F (1994) From biomats to benthic agriculture: a biohistoric revolution. In: Krumbein W, Paterson DM, Stal LJ (eds) Biostablization of sediments. Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg, Oldenbueg, pp 97–105Google Scholar
  66. Seilacher A, Buatois LA, Mangano MG (2005) Trace fossils in the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: behavioral diversification, ecological turnover and environmental shift. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol 227:323–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sepkoski JJ Jr (1992) A compendium of fossil marine animal families, 2nd edn. Milwaukee Pub Mus Contrib Biol Geol 83:155Google Scholar
  68. Sepkoski JJ Jr (2002) A compendium of fossil marine animal genera. Bull Am Paleo 363:1–560Google Scholar
  69. Sepkoski Jr JJ (1995) The ordovician radiations: diversification and extinction shown by global genus-level taxonomic data. Ordovician symposiumGoogle Scholar
  70. Servais T, Owen AW, Harper DAT, Kroger B, Munnecke A (2010) The great ordovician biodiversification event (GOBE): the palaeoecological dimension. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol 294:99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simpson GG (1953) The major features of evolution. Columbia University Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  72. Sperling EA, Vinther J (2010) A placazoan affinity for dickinsonia and the evolution of late Proterozoic metazoan feeding modes. Evol Dev 12:201–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sperling EA, Pisani D, Peterson KJ (2007) Poriferan paraphyly and its implications for Precambrian palaeobiology. In: Vickers-Richard P, Komarower P (eds) The rise and fall of the ediacaran biota. Geological Society, London, pp 355–368Google Scholar
  74. Sperling EA, Peterson KJ, Laflamme M (2011) Rangeomorphs, thectardis (porifera?) and dissolved organic carbon in the ediacaran oceans. Geobiology 9:24–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ulanowicz RE, Tuttle JH (1992) The trophic consequences of oyster stock rehabilitation in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 15:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vogel S (1977) Current-induced flow through living sponges in nature. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 74:2069–2071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Webby BD (2004) Introduction. In: Webby BD, Paris F, Droser MD, Percival IG (eds) The great ordovician biodiversification event. Columbia University Press, NY, pp 1–37Google Scholar
  78. Webby BD, Paris F, Droser MD, Percival IG (eds) (2004) The great Ordovician biodiversification event. Columbia University Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  79. Wright JP, Jones CG (2006) The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers 10 years on: progress, limitations, and challenges. Bioscience 56:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Xiao SH, Laflamme M (2008) On the eve of animal radiation: phylogeny, ecology and evolution of the ediacara biota. Trends Ecol Evol 24:31–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yoder JB, Clancey E, Des Roches S, Eastman JM, Gentry L, Godsoe W, Hagey TJ, Oswald BP, Robertson J, Sarver BAJ, Schenks JJ, Spear SF, Harmon LJ (2010) Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiation. J Evol Biol 23:1581–1596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhu MY, Babcock LE, Peng SC (2009) Advances in Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontology: integrating correlation techniques, paleobiology, taphonomy and paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Paleoworld 15:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Paleobiology, MRC-121National Museum of Natural HistoryWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Santa Fe InstituteSanta FeUSA
  3. 3.Behavior, Ecology, Evolution and Systematics (BEES)University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations